Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS

doi:10.1007/s12204-014-1505-7

上海交通大学学报（英文版） ›› 2014, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 313-324.doi: 10.1007/s12204-014-1505-7

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS

SU Xian-li1,2 (苏先礼), ZHAN Xing-qun1* (战兴群), NIU Man-cang1 (牛满仓), ZHANG Yan-hua1 (张炎华)

(1. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. The Staff Institute of Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, Sichuan, China)

出版日期:2014-06-30 发布日期:2014-07-15
通讯作者: ZHAN Xing-qun(战兴群) E-mail:xqzhan@sjtu.edu.cn

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS

SU Xian-li1,2 (苏先礼), ZHAN Xing-qun1* (战兴群), NIU Man-cang1 (牛满仓), ZHANG Yan-hua1 (张炎华)

(1. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. The Staff Institute of Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, Sichuan, China)

Online:2014-06-30 Published:2014-07-15
Contact: ZHAN Xing-qun(战兴群) E-mail:xqzhan@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： This paper used the statistical methods of quality control to assess receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) availability and fault detection (FD) capability of BeiDou14 (Phase II with 14 satellites), BeiDou (Phase III with 35 satellites) and GPS (with 31 satellites) for the first time. The three constellations are simulated and their RAIM performances are quantified by the global, Asia-Pacific region and temporal variations respectively. RAIM availability must be determined before RAIM detection. It is proposed that RAIM availability performances from satellites and constellation geometry configuration are evaluated by the number of visible satellites (NVS, NVS > 5) and geometric dilution of precision (GDOP, GDOP < 6) together. The minimal detectable bias (MDB) and minimal detectable effect (MDE) are considered as a measure of the minimum FD capability of RAIM in the measurement level and navigation position level respectively. The analyses of simulation results testify that the average global RAIM performances for BeiDou are better than that for GPS except global RAIM holes proportion. Moreover, the Asia-Pacific RAIM performances for BeiDou are much better than that for GPS in all indexes. RAIM availability from constellation geometry configuration and RAIM minimum FD capability for BeiDou14 are better than that for GPS in Asia-Pacific region in all cases, but the BeiDou14 RAIM availability from satellites are worse than GPS’s. The methods and conclusions can be used for RAIM prediction and real-time assessment of all kinds of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) constellation.

关键词: Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), GPS, receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), availability, fault detection (FD), quality control

Abstract: This paper used the statistical methods of quality control to assess receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) availability and fault detection (FD) capability of BeiDou14 (Phase II with 14 satellites), BeiDou (Phase III with 35 satellites) and GPS (with 31 satellites) for the first time. The three constellations are simulated and their RAIM performances are quantified by the global, Asia-Pacific region and temporal variations respectively. RAIM availability must be determined before RAIM detection. It is proposed that RAIM availability performances from satellites and constellation geometry configuration are evaluated by the number of visible satellites (NVS, NVS > 5) and geometric dilution of precision (GDOP, GDOP < 6) together. The minimal detectable bias (MDB) and minimal detectable effect (MDE) are considered as a measure of the minimum FD capability of RAIM in the measurement level and navigation position level respectively. The analyses of simulation results testify that the average global RAIM performances for BeiDou are better than that for GPS except global RAIM holes proportion. Moreover, the Asia-Pacific RAIM performances for BeiDou are much better than that for GPS in all indexes. RAIM availability from constellation geometry configuration and RAIM minimum FD capability for BeiDou14 are better than that for GPS in Asia-Pacific region in all cases, but the BeiDou14 RAIM availability from satellites are worse than GPS’s. The methods and conclusions can be used for RAIM prediction and real-time assessment of all kinds of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) constellation.

Key words: Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), GPS, receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), availability, fault detection (FD), quality control

中图分类号:

V 24

SU Xian-li1,2 (苏先礼), ZHAN Xing-qun1* (战兴群), NIU Man-cang1 (牛满仓), ZHANG Yan-hua1 . Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS[J]. 上海交通大学学报（英文版）, 2014, 19(3): 313-324.

SU Xian-li1,2 (苏先礼), ZHAN Xing-qun1* (战兴群), NIU Man-cang1 (牛满仓), ZHANG Yan-hua1 (张炎华). Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2014, 19(3): 313-324.

参考文献

[1] BDS-SIS-ICD-B1I-1.0, BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document-open service signal b1I (version 1.0) [S].
[2] Teunissen P J G. Quality control and GPS [M]//Teunissen P J G, Kleusberg A. GPS for geodesy. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1998.
[3] Teunissen P J G. Minimal detectable biases of GPS data [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1998, 72(4): 236-244.
[4] Ochieng W Y, Sheridan K F, Sauer K, et al. An assessment of the RAIM performance of a combined Galileo/GPS navigation system using the marginally detectable errors (MDE) algorithm [J]. GPS Solutions,2002, 5(3): 42-51.
[5] Verhagen S. Performance analysis of GPS, Galileo and integrated GPS-Galileo [C]//ION GPS 2002.Portland, OR, USA: The Institute of Navigation, 2002:2208-2215.
[6] Wu F, Kubo N, Yasuda A. Performance evaluation of GPS augmentation using Japanese Quasi-Zenith satellite system [J]. Earth Planets Space, 2004, 40(4):1249-1260.
[7] Hewitson S, Wang J. GNSS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) performance analysis [J].GPS Solutions, 2006, 10(3): 155-170.
[8] 692-5720, Air force space command capstone requirements document for global position, velocity, and time determination capability (draft) [S].
[9] Walter T, Enge P, Blanch J, et al. Worldwide vertical guidance of aircraft based on modernized GPS and new integrity augmentations [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2008, 96(12): 1918-1935.
[10] Gratton L, Joerger M, Pervan B. Carrier phase relative RAIM algorithms and protection level derivation [C]//Proceedings of the 2009 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. Anaheim,CA, USA: The Institute of Navigation, 2010: 256-264.
[11] GNSS Evolutionary Architecture Study. GNSS evolutionary architecture study, phase II — panel report[R]. Washington D C, USA: Federal Aviation Administration,2010.
[12] Xu H, Wang J, Zhan X. GNSS satellite autonomous integrity monitoring (SAIM) using inter-satellite measurements[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011,47(7): 1116-1126.
[13] Parkinson B W, Spilker J J, Axelrad P, et al.Global positioning system: Theory and applications(volume II) [M]. Washington D C: AIAA, 1996.
[14] Tiberius C, Joosten P. Quality control and integrity [EB/OL]. (2006-11-01) [2013-05-03].http://www.citg.tudelft.nl/over-faculteit/afdelingen/geoscience-and-remote-sensing/research-themes/gps/quality-control-and-integrity/.
[15] Hewitson S. Quality control for integrated GNSS and inertial navigation systems [D]. Kensington, NSW,Australia: School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, the University of New South Wales,2006.
[16] Verhagen S. Studying the performance of global navigation satellite systems: A new software tool [J]. GPS World, 2002, 13(6): 60-65.
[17] Ober P B. RAIM performance: How algorithms differ [C]//The Proceedings of the 11th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS-98). Nashville, Tennessee: The Institute of Navigation, 1998.
[18] GPS-SPS-PS, Global positioning system standard positioning service performance standard (4th edition)[S].
[19] Teunissen P J G. Quality control in integrated navigation systems [J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 1990, 5(7): 35-41.

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	YE Yingwei (叶颖微), SUN Jian* (孙健), LUO Jing (罗京) . Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Distribution Pattern and Correlation for Taxi and Metro Ridership in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2019, 24(2): 137-147.
[2]	ZHOU Jingmei *(周经美), ZHAO Xiangmo (赵祥模), CHENG Xin (程鑫), XU Zhigang (徐志刚), ZHAO. Vehicle Ego-Localization Based on Streetscape Image Database Under Blind Area of Global Positioning System[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2019, 24(1): 122-129.
[3]	JIANG Cailin1 (江才林), LU Zhiqiang1* (陆志强), CUI Weiwei2 (崔维伟). Heuristics for the Identical Machine Scheduling Problem with Preventive Maintenances[J]. 上海交通大学学报（英文版）, 2016, 21(1): 112-120.
[4]	WANG Wen-guang (王文光), DU Shi-jia* (杜时佳), CUI Li-rong (崔利荣). Multi-Point and Multi-Interval Availabilities for Markov Repairable Systems with History-Dependent Up and Down States[J]. 上海交通大学学报（英文版）, 2015, 20(3): 349-352.
[5]	HONG Jiang-tao1,2* (洪江涛), CHEN Jun-fang2 (陈俊芳). Game Theory Analysis of Quality Control in Two-Echelon Supply Chain[J]. 上海交通大学学报（英文版）, 2013, 18(4): 508-512.