Please wait a minute...
IMAGE/TABLE DETAILS
Inversion of Displacement Field of Marine Slender Pipelines Under Three-Dimensional Background Ocean Currents
GUO Li, YUAN Yuchao, TANG Wenyong
Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University    2025, 59 (12): 1815-1823.   DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2024.007
Abstract   (1708 HTML9 PDF(pc) (2176KB)(367)  

Marine pipelines are widely used in offshore engineering and are highly vulnerable to accidental damage caused by underwater structures such as ship anchors and deep-sea submersibles, especially in the dark and unpredictable marine environment. Research on configuration monitoring of marine pipelines is essential to ensure their operational safety. This paper develops a displacement field inversion model for marine pipelines under the influence of three-dimensional background ocean currents, based on the inverse finite element method. The model consists of an input parameter module, a coordinate conversion module, and a displacement reconstruction function module. It takes into account key characteristics such as large curvature, three-dimensional coupling with large displacements, and local flipping behavior. The proposed approach addresses the technical challenges associated with low-order deformation modes and irregular displacement patterns. The impact of the number and layout of monitoring points on the accuracy of displacement field inversion is studied. The results show that the layout with a monitoring point spacing of 100 m and an angle of 30° can meet the engineering accuracy requirements. The findings of this paper can provide valuable insights and methods for the design of marine pipeline health monitoring systems.


Fig.12 Average relative error of displacement field reconstruction
Extracts from the Article
为更直观地展示测点布置对位移场重构的影响规律,图12展示3种来流下重构位移场的平均相对误差.对于90° 布置方式,反演误差最大,个别工况的反演误差甚至超过100%.随着测点位置布置的更加精确,重构位移场的误差越来越小.对于30° 布置方式,除45° 来流下Y方向的预报平均相对误差较大,其他工况和位置的平均相对误差均在12%以内.对于全局布置方式,45° 来流下Y方向的预报平均相对误差降至13.5%,其他工况和位置的平均相对误差均在10%以内.部分工况全局布置下的X方向和Z方向平均相对误差大于30° 布置的工况,但从图11中可以看出全局布置的重构位形更接近目标位形,平均相对误差更大的原因是全局布置对XZ方向位移较小的区域重构效果较差,更小的基数导致更大的相对误差.
Other Images/Table from this Article