Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering

A Numerical Model for Analysing Response of Membrane Surface Under Ponding Load

Expand
  • School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 2021-05-08

  Online published: 2022-07-04

Abstract

A numerical model to analyze the response of the membrane surface under ponding load is propesed which combines the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method and the non-linear constitutive model of the membrane material. According to the stress-strain response surface of the membrane material based on the biaxial tensile test with different stress ratios, a nonlinear constitutive model is established. SPH particles are used to simulate water, and a numerical model of the fluid-solid coupling between the membrane surface and ponding load is established. The mesh size adopted in this paper is determined by verifying the mesh convergence, and the influence of the loading time on the calculation results is analyzed. At the same time, the distribution law of stress and strain of the membrane surface are analyzed. The results show that the loading process becomes increasingly stable with the increase of the loading time, and 100 s can meet the analysis requirements.The numerical simulation results are compared with those of the flat membrane ponding test. It is found that the maximum vertical deformation of the membrane surface is in good agreement, which verifies the reliability of the method proposed in this paper.

Cite this article

WANG Shasha, ZHANG Xiangyu, QIU Guozhi, GONG Jinghai . A Numerical Model for Analysing Response of Membrane Surface Under Ponding Load[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022 , 56(6) : 730 -738 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.152

References

[1] 董石麟, 邢栋, 赵阳. 现代大跨空间结构在中国的应用与发展[J]. 空间结构, 2012, 18(1): 3-16.
[1] DONG Shilin, XING Dong, ZHAO Yang. Application and development of modern long-span space structures in China[J]. Spatial Structures, 2012, 18(1): 3-16.
[2] 吴明儿, 王暄. ETFE薄膜结构积水试验与数值分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2012, 14(4): 18-21.
[2] WU Minger, WANG Xuan. Experimental and numerical studies on the ponding of ETFE foil structures[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2012, 14(4): 18-21.
[3] 罗永赤. 膜结构积水的事故与控制[J]. 建筑结构, 2008, 38(2): 101-102.
[3] LUO Yongchi. Water-collection analysis of membrane structure[J]. Building Structure, 2008, 38(2): 101-102.
[4] 宋小兵, 李中立, 龚景海. 大跨度充气膜结构的研究与应用[C]∥第十九届全国现代结构工程学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 工业建筑, 2019: 140-147.
[4] SONG Xiaobing, LI Zhongli, GONG Jinghai. Research and application of large-span inflatable membrane structure[C]∥The 19th National Symposium on Modern Structural Engineering. Beijing: Industrial Construction, 2019: 140-147.
[5] American Society of Civil Engineers. Tensile membrane structures: ASCE/SEI 55-10[S]. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
[6] 中国工程建设标准化协会. 膜结构技术规程: CECS 158—2015[S]. 北京: 中国工程建设标准化协会, 2015.
[6] China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. Technical specification for membrane structures: CECS 158—2015[S]. Beijing: China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization, 2015.
[7] Membrane Structures Association of Japan. Testing method for elastic constants of membrane materials: MSAJ/M-02-1995[S]. Tokyo: Membrane Structures Association of Japan, 1995.
[8] GAO C J, CHEN W J, SHI T B, et al. Response surface characterization for biaxial tensile properties of envelope fabrics under multiple stress ratios[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 230: 111482.
[9] SHI T B, HU J H, CHEN W J, et al. A refined numerical model for determining inflation-burst behavior of composite membrane structures[J]. Polymer Testing, 2020, 81: 106123.
[10] 李意, 陈务军, 高成军, 等. 考虑裁切效应飞艇囊体模型充气数值模拟与试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 277-284.
[10] LI Yi, CHEN Wujun, GAO Chengjun, et al. Numerical simulation and tests on inflation of an airship envelope model with cutting pattern effects[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020, 54(3): 277-284.
[11] 张影, 袁行飞, 徐晓红. 强降雨作用下具有初始凹陷的充气膜结构袋状效应研究[J]. 空间结构, 2018, 24(4): 49-55.
[11] ZHANG Ying, YUAN Xingfei, XU Xiaohong. Analysis of bagging effect in air-supported membrane structures with initial imperfections under intensive rainfall[J]. Spatial Structures, 2018, 24(4): 49-55.
[12] NARAYANAN N K, WÜCHNER R, DEGROOTE J. Monolithic and partitioned approaches to determine static deformation of membrane structures due to ponding[J]. Computers & Structures, 2021, 244: 106419.
[13] SIMULIA D. Abaqus 6.11 analysis user’s manual[DB/OL]. (2011-02-15)[2021-05-08] https:∥www.researchgate.net/publication/310842372_Abaqus_611_analysis_user’s_manual.
[14] 孟翔, 高路恒, 吴浩, 等. 基于SPH无网格法的纺锤形桩靴连续贯入过程模拟[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2020(4): 111-118.
[14] MENG Xiang, GAO Luheng, WU Hao, et al. Numerical simulation of continuous penetration of spudcan based on SPH mesh-free method[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2020(4): 111-118.
[15] 李文盛, 赵友清, 贾善坡, 等. 储液容器内液体晃荡的非线性动力学分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(1): 87-92.
[15] LI Wensheng, ZHAO Youqing, JIA Shanpo, et al. Numerical analysis on liquid sloshing in storage container by nonlinear dynamics method[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 87-92.
[16] 周杰, 徐胜利. 弹丸入水特性的SPH计算模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(3): 326-332.
[16] ZHOU Jie, XU Shengli. SPH simulation on the behaviors of projectile water entry[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 326-332.
Outlines

/