Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University >

2022 , Vol. 56 >Issue 5: 635 - 647

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.329

Mechanical Engineering

Large Eddy Simulation on Blow-Off Limit of Methane and Hydrogen-Mixed Gas

Expand
  • 1. Institute for Energy Research, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China
    2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013,Jiangsu, China
    3. Centro Combustione Ambiente, Bali 70023, Italy

Received date: 2020-10-15

  Online published: 2022-06-07

Fold

Abstract

The blow-off limits of methane and hydrogen-mixed gas on the Sydney inhomogeneous inflow jet burner were calculated and studied by large eddy simulation. The GRI 3.0 detailed reaction mechanism, 28-step and 19-step methane simplified reaction mechanisms were used to calculate the laminar premixed flames under the condition of different hydrogen-mixed fuel gases, which demonstrates the good performance of the 19-step simplified mechanism. A dynamic thickening flame combustion model was combined with the 19-step reaction mechanism to compute the Sydney partially premixed jet flame burner with a hydrogen-mixed gas (the volume ratio of V(H2):V(CH4):V(CO):V(CO2) = 0.2:0.2:0.27:0.33). The blow-off limits in FA and FJ layouts of hydrogen-mixed gas are 90 m/s and 109 m/s, while for pure methane flames are 74 m/s and 128 m/s, respectively. The difference of blow-off limits between the two fuels is related to the inhomogeneity of fuel and air mixing in different layouts. This study shows that the combustion stability can be improved by optimizing the inlet layout and mixing process of fuel gas and air.

Key words： partially premixed flame; blow-off limit; hydrogen-mixed gas; thickened flame model; large eddy simulation

Cite this article

ZHOU Xirui, WANG Ping, ZENG Haixiang, ZHANG Yang, PRASHANT Shrotriya, ANTONIO Ferrante, QI Haotian . Large Eddy Simulation on Blow-Off Limit of Methane and Hydrogen-Mixed Gas[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022 , 56(5) : 635 -647 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.329

References

[1] GICQUEL L Y M, STAFFELBACH G, POINSOT T. Large Eddy Simulations of gaseous flames in gas turbine combustion chambers[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38(6): 782-817.
[2] SYRED N, BEÉR J M. Combustion in swirling flows: A review[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1974, 23(2): 143-201.
[3] MEARES S, MASRI A R. A modified piloted burner for stabilizing turbulent flames of inhomogeneous mixtures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(2): 484-495.
[4] BARLOW R S, MEARES S, MAGNOTTI G, et al. Local extinction and near-field structure in piloted turbulent CH4/air jet flames with inhomogeneous inlets[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(10): 3516-3540.
[5] GUIBERTI T F, CUTCHER H, ROBERTS W L, et al. Influence of pilot flame parameters on the stability of turbulent jet flames[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(3): 2128-2137.
[6] GUIBERTI T F, JUDDOO M, LACOSTE D A, et al. Fuel effects on the stability of turbulent flames with compositionally inhomogeneous inlets[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 1777-1784.
[7] CUTCHER H C, BARLOW R S, MAGNOTTI G, et al. Turbulent flames with compositionally inhomogeneous inlets: Resolved measurements of scalar dissipation rates[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 1737-1745.
[8] PERRY B A, MUELLER M E, MASRI A R. A two mixture fraction flamelet model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 1767-1775.
[9] GALINDO S, SALEHI F, CLEARY M J, et al. MMC-LES simulations of turbulent piloted flames with varying levels of inlet inhomogeneity[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 1759-1766.
[10] KLEINHEINZ K, KUBIS T, TRISJONO P, et al. Computational study of flame characteristics of a turbulent piloted jet burner with inhomogeneous inlets[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 1747-1757.
[11] KIM N, KIM Y. Multi-environment probability density function approach for turbulent partially-premixed methane/air flame with inhomogeneous inlets[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 182: 190-205.
[12] FRANZELLI B, RIBER E, GICQUEL L Y M, et al. Large Eddy Simulation of combustion instabilities in a lean partially premixed swirled flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(2): 621-637.
[13] 曾海翔. 基于DTF模型的部分预混火焰大涡模拟研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2020.
[13] ZENG Haixiang. Large eddy simulation of partially premixed flame based on DTF model[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2020.
[14] HALTER F, CHAUVEAU C, GÖKALP I. Characterization of the effects of hydrogen addition in premixed methane/air flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2585-2592.
[15] ZHAO K, CUI D W, XU T M, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on methane combustion[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(11): 1142-1147.
[16] TOSHIMITSU K, MATSUO A, KAMEL M R, et al. Numerical simulations and planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging results of hypersonic reactive flows[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(1): 16-21.
[17] LYTRAS I, KOUTMOS P, DOGKAS E. Reduced kinetic models for methane flame simulations[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2019, 55(2): 132-147.
[18] 王平, 侯天增, 余倩. 火焰增厚燃烧模型计算旋转预混火焰的参数敏感性分析[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(2): 358-365.
[18] WANG Ping, HOU Tianzeng, YU Qian. Large eddy simulation of premixed swirling flames with thickened-flame model: A sensitivity study[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(2): 358-365.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉