Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University >

2022 , Vol. 56 >Issue 4: 506 - 515

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.327

Transportation Engineering

Numerical Simulation Strategy Optimization Analysis of Submarine Resistance and Flow Field

Expand
  • College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received date: 2020-10-11

  Online published: 2022-05-07

Fold

Abstract

In order to explore the influence of different turbulence models on the resistance and flow field of an advancing submarine, based on the STAR-CCM+platform, and taking Sub-off as the geometric model, this paper adopts the finite volume method, combing 10 turbulence models to conduct numerical research on hydrodynamic and flow field characteristics of Sub-off. First, the LES-Smagorinsky turbulence model is used for the convergence of grids and time steps. Then, the appropriate grid and time step are selected to calculate 10 kinds of turbulence models in specific cases. Finally, the selected turbulence model is used to analyze the hydrodynamic characteristics and flow fields of Sub-off. The results show that there are great differences among the 10 turbulence models in the prediction of submarine hydrodynamic performance and flow field characteristics. LES-Smagorinsky can not only predict the hydrodynamic performance and the average flow field of submarine, but also accurately predict secondary variables of flow fields.

Key words： turbulence model; submarine; hydrodynamic performance; flow field characteristics

Cite this article

LI Peng, WANG Chao, SUN Huawei, GUO Chunyu . Numerical Simulation Strategy Optimization Analysis of Submarine Resistance and Flow Field[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022 , 56(4) : 506 -515 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.327

References

[1] 毕毅, 高霄鹏, 王波, 等. 潜艇水动力噪声的自航模试验技术研究[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2007, 19(5): 40-43.
[1] BI Yi, GAO Xiaopeng, WANG Bo, et al. Acoustic test technique for submarine using remote submersible model[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2007, 19(5): 40-43.
[2] PAN Y C, ZHANG H X, ZHOU Q D. Numerical simulation of unsteady propeller force for a submarine in straight ahead sailing and steady diving maneuver[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2019, 11(2): 899-913.
[3] POSA A, BALARAS E. A numerical investigation of the wake of an axisymmetric body with appendages[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 792: 470-498.
[4] YAO H L, ZHANG H X, LIU H T, et al. Numerical study of flow-excited noise of a submarine with full appendages considering fluid structure interaction using the boundary element method[J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2017, 77: 1-9.
[5] 王超, 郑小龙, 李亮, 等. Y +值对潜艇流场大涡模拟计算精度的影响[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(4): 79-83.
[5] WANG Chao, ZHENG Xiaolong, LI Liang, et al. Influence of Y + on the calculation of submarine flow field characteristics of LES calculation accuracy [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(4): 79-83.
[6] FU S, XIAO Z X, CHEN H X, et al. Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(6): 1379-1390.
[7] 李士强, 肖昌润, 曹植珺. 基于STAR-CCM+的潜艇尾流场及水动力数值分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2018, 13(Sup.1): 29-35.
[7] LI Shiqiang, XIAO Changrun, CAO Zhijun. Numerical analysis of wake flow and hydrodynamics for a submarine based on STAR-CCM+[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2018, 13(Sup.1): 29-35.
[8] 李士强, 肖昌润. 基于STAR-CCM+的潜艇舵翼水动力性能研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2019, 41(11): 37-42.
[8] LI Shiqiang, XIAO Changrun. Research on hydrodynamic performance of submarine rudder wing based on STAR-CCM+[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2019, 41(11): 37-42.
[9] GROVES N, HUANG T, CHANG M. Geometric characteristics of DARAPA Sub-off models[R]. Maryland, USA: David Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center, 1989.
[10] LI H, THOMAS T. Summary of DARPA Sub-off experimental program data [R]. Maryland, USA: David Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center, 1998.
[11] HUANG T, LIU H, GROVES N, et al. Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages in a wind tunnel: The DARPA Sub-off experimental program[J]. [C]//Proceedings of 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Seoul, Korea: National Academic Press, 1992.
[12] KUMAR P, MAHSH K. Large eddy simulation of propeller wake instabilities[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 814: 361-396.
[13] 胡健, 耿冲, 冯峰. 基于大涡模拟的螺旋桨梢涡数值分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(11): 68-73.
[13] HU Jian, GENG Chong, FENG Feng. Numerical analysis of propeller tip vortex based on large eddy simulation[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 45(11): 68-73.
[14] SHARIATI S K, MOUSAVIZADEGAN S H. The effect of appendages on the hydrodynamic characteristics of an underwater vehicle near the free surface[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 67: 31-43.
[15] STERN F, WILSON R V, COLEMAN H W, et al. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 1: Methodology and procedures[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(4): 793-802.
[16] JONES D A, CLARKE D B. Simulation of a wing-body junction experiment using the fluent code[R]. Victoria, Australia: DSTO Platforms Sciences Laboratory, 2005.
[17] ÖLÇMEN S M, SIMPSON R L. Some features of a turbulent wing-body junction vortical flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2006, 27(6): 980-993.
[18] ROACHE P J. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 29(1): 123-160.
[19] HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows [C]//Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 1988. New York, USA: Standford University Center for Turbulence Research, 1988.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉