An aerodynamic optimization design method for high bypass ratio fan blades based on the Kriging surrogate model was constructed, which integrated parametric modeling, TurboGrid meshing, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combined optimization technology. The optimization method was implemented for airfoils at several spans of a fan blade and redesign of airfoils from blade setting angle rotating and maximum-thickness position moving. The mass flow at stall points was chosen as target function to evaluate and optimize the stable operating range of fan blade. Compared with prototype design, the stable operating range of the blade optimized was expanded by 10.1%, among which the aerodynamic performance was also enhanced, with a maximum increment of 2.63% for efficiency and 9.27% for pressure coefficient. The results show that the optimization design system has broadened the stable operating range of fan blade effectively, and has also substantially improved efficiency and total pressure rise.
ZHANG Ke, WU Yadong
. Blade Optimization Design for Expanding Stable Operating Range of
High Bypass Ratio Fan[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020
, 54(10)
: 1024
-1034
.
DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.130
[1]SONG Peng, SUN Jinju. Blade shape optimization for transonic axial flow fan[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29(3): 931-938.
[2]ABADI S M, AHMADPOUR A, MEYER J P, et al. CFD-based shape optimization of steam turbine blade cascade in transonic two phase flows[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 112(2): 1575-1589.
[3]ADEEB E, MAQSOOD A, MUSTHAQ A, et al. Comparison of airfoil precomputational analysis methods for optimization of wind turbine blades[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(3): 1081-1088.
[4]CHAN C M, BAI H L, HE D Q. Blade shape optimization of the Savonius wind turbine using a genetic algorithm[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 213(3): 148-157.
[5]SANGER N L. The use of optimization techniques to design controlled diffusion compressor blading[J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1983, 105: 256-265.
[6]ADEEB E, MAQSOOD A, MUSTHAQ A, et al. Parametric study and optimization of ceiling fan blades for improved aerodynamic performance[J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 9(6): 2905-2916.
[7]OYAMA A, LIOU M S, OBAYASHI S. Multi-point design optimization of a high bypass ratio fan blade[C]. 30th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. Daejeon, Korea: ICAS, 2016: 25-30.
[8]TREPANIER J Y, LUPIEN A, TRIBES C, et al. A 3d parameterization for transonic fan blade multidisciplinary design[J]. Aeronautics and Aerospace Open Access Journal, 2017, 1(1): 31-39.
[9]脱伟, 熊劲松, 侯安平, 等. 遗传算法在多级压气机气动优化设计中的应用[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(2): 305-309.
TUO Wei, XIONG Jinsong, HOU Anping, et al. Application of genetic algorithm to multi-stage compressor aerodynamic optimization design[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(2): 305-309.
[10]孙俊峰, 刘刚, 江雄, 等. 基于Kriging模型的旋翼翼型优化设计研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2013, 31(4): 437-441.
SUN Junfeng, LIU Gang, JIANG Xiong, et al. Research of rotor airfoil design optimization based on the Kriging model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(4): 437-441.
[11]张金环, 周正贵, 周旭. 大涵道比风扇叶片气动优化设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(1): 239-247.
ZHANG Jinhuan, ZHOU Zhenggui, ZHOU Xu. Aerodynamic optimization design of high bypass ratio fan blades[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(1): 239-247.
[12]高星, 刘宝杰. 高比转速斜流叶轮根尖加功量分配的影响分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2008, 9(4): 1475-1478.
GAO Xing, LIU Baojie. Effects of circulation spanwise distribution on high specific speed mixed-flow impellers[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2008, 9(4): 1475-1478.
[13]韩忠华. Kriging模型及代理优化算法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225.
HAN Zhonghua. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: A review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225.
[14]王元, 方开泰. 关于均匀分布与试验设计(数论方法)[J]. 科学通报, 1981, 26(2): 65-70.
WANG Yuan, FANGKaitai. About uniform distribution and experimental design (number theory method)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1981, 26(2): 65-70.