Time-Domain Nonlinear Damage Detection Based on GARCH Effect and Improved Penalty Index

Expand
  • School of Civil Engineering; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Online published: 2019-12-11

Abstract

In service period, some structures may exist damages like cracks, and the opening and closing of cracks make the damage display a time-domain nonlinear characteristic. In addition,time-domain model methods mainly provide the characteristic change of degree of freedom of adjacent nodes caused by stiffness damage, but it is difficult to directly show the inter-storey stiffness information. To solve these problems, a damage detection method based on GARCH model and improved penalty index was presented. Firstly, basic theory of GARCH model was described, and the order estimation and the parameter estimation of GARCH model were proposed. Then, the bilinear stiffness characteristic of time-domain nonlinearity was analyzed, and the nonlinear damage identification principle and basic GARCH index of stiffness identification were presented. Finally, an improved GARCH penalty index method was established to enhance the identification reliability for the inter-storey stiffness damage. Simulation and experiment results indicate that the improved GARCH penalty index can well identify the structural nonlinear damage, and the identification effect of the proposed index is obviously better than those of the basic GARCH index and those combined with autoregressive model and the cepstral metric index.

Cite this article

GUO Huiyong,HUANG Qi . Time-Domain Nonlinear Damage Detection Based on GARCH Effect and Improved Penalty Index[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019 , 53(11) : 1326 -1334 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.99.003

References

[1]LI P J, XU D W, ZHANG J. Probability-based structural health monitoring through Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2016, 16(7): 1550039. [2]BAO C X, HAO H, LI Z X. Integrated ARMA model method for damage detection of subsea pipeline system[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 48: 176-192. [3]李万润, 杜永峰, 倪一清, 等. 基于伪传递函数的高耸结构损伤识别[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2015, 35(1): 63-69. LI Wanrun, DU Yongfeng, NI Yiqing, et al. High-rise structure damage identification based on pseudo-transfer function [J]. Journal of Vibration,Measurement & Diagnosis, 2015, 35(1): 63-69. [4]FASSOIS S D, SAKELLARIOU J S. Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2007, 365(1851): 411-448. [5]ZHENG H T, MITA A. Damage indicator defined as the distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring[J]. Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 2008, 15(7): 992-1005. [6]DA SILVA S, DIAS M, LOPES V. Damage detection in a benchmark structure using AR-ARX models and statistical pattern recognition[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2007, 29(2): 174-184. [7]NAIR K K, KIREMIDJIAN A S, LAW K H. Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 291(1/2): 349-368. [8]SAAED T E,NIKOLAKOPOULOS G. Identification of building damage using ARMAX model: A parametric study[J]. Diagnostyka, 2016, 17(3): 3-14. [9]罗德河, 郑东健, 甘声玄, 等. 基于ARMAX模型的混凝土坝损伤诊断[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018, 51(4): 294-298. LUO Dehe, ZHENG Dongjian, GAN Shengxuan, et al. Damage diagnosis of concrete dams based on ARMAX model[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2018, 51(4): 294-298. [10]BOLLERSLEV T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31(3): 307-327. [11]KIM Y, HWANG E. A dynamic Markov regime-switching GARCH model and its cumulative impulse response function[J]. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2018, 139: 20-30. [12]ZHANG Y J, ZHANG Y X, DENG Z M, et al. Sea surface target detection based on complex ARMA-GARCH processes[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2017, 70: 1-13. [13]CHEN L J, YU L. Structural nonlinear damage identification algorithm based on time series ARMA/GARCH model[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2013, 16(9): 1597-1609. [14]JIANG W, RUAN Q S, LI J F, et al. Modeling returns volatility: Realized GARCH incorporating realized risk measure[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 500: 249-258. [15]XING Z H, MITA A. Locating the damaged storey of a building using distance measures of low-order AR models[J]. Smart Structures and Systems, 2010, 6(9): 991-1005. [16]赵仕通, 肖黎, 屈文忠. 框架结构非线性损伤的主成分分析识别方法研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2018, 37(1): 8-12. ZHAO Shitong, XIAO Li, QU Wenzhong. Study on nonlinear damage identification of frame structure with a principal component analysis method[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 37(1): 8-12.
Outlines

/