Sensitivity analysis is a method of product platform planning considering the influence of design parameters on performance. However, the current sensitivity analysis method is difficult to apply to products where there is no clear mathematical function between the performance parameters and design parameters. In view of this deficiency, a sensitivity analysis method based on virtual orthogonal test is proposed, and the product platform planning is carried out in combination with improved QFD. Firstly, the virtual test scheme is determined based on the orthogonal experiment design method. Secondly, a virtual test environment is built by built-in software, in which the design parameters is set of different values and the performance parameters’ change is recorded in real-time. And the sensitivity of the design parameters is calculated based on the ratio of the two parameters. Then the sensitivity matrix is constructed and used to replace the traditional correlation matrix in the QFD house to measure the degree of correlation between the design parameters and the performance parameters so as to reduce the subjectivity of the traditional QFD method. Finally, the improved QFD method is used to identify the product platform parameters, and the effectiveness of the method is verified.
YUAN Zhenlong,CHU Xuening,ZHANG Lei
. Product Platform Planning Method Based on Virtual Orthogonal Test and Improved QFD[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018
, 52(8)
: 930
-937
.
DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.08.008
［1］SIMPSON T W, MAIER J R, MISTREE F. Product platform design: Method and application［J］. Research in Engineering Design, 2001, 13(1): 2-22.
［2］NAYAK R U, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. A variation-based method for product family design［J］. Engineering Optimization, 2002, 34(1): 65-81.
［3］镇璐, 蒋祖华, 孟祥慧. 基于进化的产品平台参数规划方法［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2006, 40(5): 818-821.
ZHEN Lu, JIANG Zuhua, MENG Xianghui. A method of evolutionary product platform parameters planning［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2006, 40(5): 818-821.
［4］MESSAC A, MARTINEZ M P, SIMPSON T W. Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002, 124(2): 164-172.
［5］程贤福. 基于设计关联矩阵和差异度分析的可调节变量产品平台设计方法［J］. 机械设计, 2013, 30(4): 1-5.
CHENG Xianfu. Scalable product platform design based on design relation matrix and diversity analysis［J］. Journal of Machine Design, 2013, 30(4): 1-5.
［6］李柏姝, 雒兴刚, 唐加福. 基于灵敏度分析的产品族规划方法［J］. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(15): 117-124.
LI Baishu, LUO Xinggang, TANG Jiafu. Sensitivity analysis-based method for product family design［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(15): 117-124.
［7］程强, 刘广博, 刘志峰, 等. 基于敏感度分析的机床关键性几何误差源识别方法［J］. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(7): 171-179.
CHENG Qiang, LIU Guangbo, LIU Zhifeng, et al. An identification approach for the key geometric error sources of machine tools based on sensitivity analysis［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(7): 171-179.
［8］朱斌, 江平宇, 龙奕良. 产品平台参数的回归规划方法及Web实现［J］. 计算机集成制造系统, 2003, 9(12): 1067-1071.
ZHU Bin, JIANG Pingyu, LONG Yiliang. Product platform variables planning method based on regression analysis and its Web implementation［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 2003, 9(12): 1067-1071.
［9］周晓和, 任杰, 马大为, 等. 适应性底座附加载荷影响因素的敏感度分析［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(5): 657-662.
ZHOU Xiaohe, REN Jie, MA Dawei, et al. Sensitivity analysis of affecting factors for additional load on adaptive base［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015, 49(5): 657-662.
［10］ZUO W, E J, LIU X, et al. Orthogonal experimental design and fuzzy grey relational analysis for emitter efficiency of the micro-cylindrical combustor with a step［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 103: 945-951.
［11］NAHM Y E, ISHIKAWA H, INOUE M. New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 65(9/10/11/12): 1587-1604.
［12］KARSAK E E, DURSUN M. An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(16): 6995-7004.
［13］LI M, JIN L, WANG J. A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user’s perspective in in-tuitionistic fuzzy environment［J］. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 21: 28-37.
［14］XIA S S, WANG L Y. Customer requirements mapping method based on association rule mining for mass customization［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2008, 13(3): 291-296.
［15］IQBAL Z, GRIGG N P, GOVINDARAJU K, et al. A distance-based methodology for increased extraction of information from the roof matrices in QFD studies［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(11): 3277-3293.
［16］GENG X, CHU X, XUE D, et al. A systematic decision-making approach for the optimal product-service system planning［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 11849-11858.
［17］魏红生, 何建农. 基于点锐度法和小波变换的图像融合方法［J］. 计算机工程, 2010, 36(23): 204-206.
WEI Hongsheng, HE Jiannong. Images fusion algorithm based on point sharpness method and wavelet transformation［J］. Computer Engineering, 2010, 36(23): 204-206.
［18］李中凯, 朱真才, 谢蕾, 等. 参数化产品族的通用性与性能权衡评价方法［J］. 中国工程机械学报, 2010, 8(1): 35-40.
LI Zhongkai, ZHU Zhencai, XIE Lei, et al. Genetic performance trading-off evaluation on parametric product family［J］. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2010, 8(1): 35-40.
