Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University >

2018 , Vol. 52 >Issue 8: 976 - 981

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.08.014

The Cognitive Mechanism of Brain Cortex on Aircraft Flyover Noise

Expand
  • 1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2017-06-05

Fold

Abstract

In order to study the cognitive mechanism of human cerebral cortex on aircraft flyover noise, 25 healthy subjects were studied and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique was carried out. The data were processed statistically and the brain functional regions were located. The results have shown that 25 subjects significantly activated the visual combined cortex, prefrontal cortex, primary motor cortex, and brain regions associated with cognitive memory, which means the cerebral cortex is not only involved in the auditory treatment, may also involved in negative emotions, cognitive, attention, memory and other reactions.

Key words： aircraft flyover noise; cerebral cortex; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techno-logy; cognitive mechanism

Cite this article

LIAN Yidan,CAI Jun,ZHANG Zhongwei,LIU Jiahang,WANG Tao . The Cognitive Mechanism of Brain Cortex on Aircraft Flyover Noise[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018 , 52(8) : 976 -981 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.08.014

References

［1］CHEN T J, CHEN S S, HSIEH P Y, et al. Auditory effects of aircraft noise on people living near an airport［J］. Archives of Environment Health, 1997, 52(1): 45-50. ［2］柳小毅, 施祥, 卢向明, 等. 机场噪声与公众主观烦恼关系［J］. 噪声与振动控制, 2009, 4(2): 203-206. LIU Xiaoyi, SHI Xiang, LU Xiangming, et al. The relationship between airport noise and public subjective annoyance［J］. Noise and Vibration Control, 2009, 4(2): 203-206. ［3］EVANS G W, HYGGE S, BULLINGER M. Chronic noise and psychological stress［J］. Psychological Science, 1995, 6(6): 333-338. ［4］HAINES M M, STANSFELD S A, JOB R F, et al. A follow-up study of effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child stress responses and cognition［J］. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001, 30(4): 839-845. ［5］JONES F N, TAUSCHER J. Residence under an airport landing pattern as a factor in teratism［J］. Archives of Environment Health, 1978, 33(1): 10-12. ［6］MUZET A. Environmental noise, sleep and health［J］. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2007, 11(2): 135-142. ［7］ELMENHORST E M, ELMENHORST D, WENZEL J, et al. Effects of nocturnal aircraft noise on cognitive performance in the following morning: Dose-response relationships in laboratory and field［J］. International Archives of Occupational and Environment Health, 2010, 83(7): 743-751. ［8］JARUP L, BABISCH W, HOUTHUIJS D, et al. Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: The HYENA study［J］. Environment Health Perspectives, 2008, 116(3): 329-333. ［9］SCHULTZ T J. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 64(2): 377-405. ［10］ZWICHER E, FASTL H. Psychoacoustics—Facts and models［M］, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2006: 328-330. ［11］BABISCH W, HOUTHUIJS D, PERSHAGEN G, et al. Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years—Results of the HYENA study［J］. Environment International, 2009, 35(8): 1169-1176. ［12］LASZLO H E, MCROBIE E S, STANSFELD S A, et al. Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure—A review［J］. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 435(7): 551-562. ［13］HUNTER M D, EICKHOFF S B, PHEASANT R J, et al. The state of tranquility: Subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity［J］. Neuroimage, 2010, 53(2): 611-618. ［14］LANGERS D R, VAN DIJK P, SCHOENMAKER E S, et al. fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness［J］. Neuroimage, 2007, 35(2): 709-718. ［15］OGAWA S, LEE T M, KAY A R, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation［J］. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science USA, 1990, 87(24): 9868-9872. ［16］PEELLE J E. Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging［J］. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2014, 8(8): 1-10. ［17］WANG Y C, LIU S N, DONG Y W, et al. Effects of acoustic characteristics on annoyance of aircraft flyover noise［J］. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 2015, 63 (3): 279-286. ［18］BUXTON R B. Introduction to functional magnetic resonance imaging: Principles and techniques［M］. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 368-399. ［19］耿左军, 张云亭, 张权, 等. 感音神经性聋人和正常人纯音刺激脑功能区BOLD-fMRI研究［J］. 中华耳科学杂志, 2005, 3(3): 165-169. GENG Zuojun, ZHANG Yunting, ZHANG Quan, et al. BOLD-fMRI study on functional areas of pure tone stimulation in sensorineural deaf and normal people［J］. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 2005, 3(3): 165-169. ［20］夏爽, 祁吉, 尹建忠, 等. 单侧感音神经性耳聋病人听觉中枢的fMRI研究［J］. 中国医学影像技术, 2005, 21(9): 1312-1316. XIA Shuang, QI Ji, YIN Jianzhong, et al. Functional MRI study of auditory cortex in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss［J］. Chinese Medical Imaging Technology, 2005, 21(9): 1312-1316. ［21］杨明, 刘斌, 滕皋军, 等. 听觉功能MRI研究的实验设计［J］. 中枢神经影像学, 2008, 24(3): 358-362. YANG Ming, LIU Bin, TENG Gaojun, et al. Experimental design of auditory function MRI study［J］. Central Neuroimaging, 2008, 24(3): 358-362. ［22］BUSSEY T J, SAKSIDA L M. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes［J］. Hippocampus, 2007, 17(9): 898-908. ［23］LPEZ-ARANDA M F, LPEZ-TLLEZ J F, NAVARRO-LOBATO I, et al. Role of layer 6 of V2 visual cortex in object recognition memory［J］. Science, 2009, 325: 87-89. ［24］WOLPERT D M, GOODBODY S J, HUSAIN M. Maintaining internal representations: The role of the human superior parietal lobe［J］. Nature Neuroscience, 1998, 1(6): 529-533. ［25］KOENIGS M, BARBEY A K, POSTLE B R, et al. Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory［J］. Journal of Neuroscience, 2009, 29(47): 14980-14986. ［26］REIMAN E M, LANE R D, AHEM G L, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of externally and internally generated human emotion［J］. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1997, 154: 918-925. ［27］KERESTES R, LADOUCEUR C D, MEDA S, et al. Abnormal prefrontal activity subserving attentional control of emotion in remitted depressed patients during a working memory task with emotional distracters［J］. Psychological Medicine, 2012, 42(1): 29-40. ［28］LANE R D, REIMAN E M, AHERN G L, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex participates in the conscious experience of emotion［J］. Neuroimage, 1996, 3(3): 58-73. ［29］TARD C, DEMAILLY F, DELVAL A. Hypometabolism in posterior and temporal areas of the brain is associated with cognitive decline in parkinson’s disease［J］. Journal of Parkinsons Disease, 2015, 5(3): 569-574. ［30］ARDILAr A, BERNAL B, ROSSELLI M. Language and visual perception associations: Meta-analytic connectivity modeling of Brodmann area 37［J］. Behavioural Neurology, 2015, 2015: 1-14. ［31］CONE N E, BURMAN D D, BITAN T, et al. Developmental changes in brain regions involved in phonological and orthographic processing during spoken language processing［J］. Neuroimage, 2008, 41(2): 623-635. ［32］GEORGIEWA P, RZANNY R, HOPF J M, et al. fMRI during word processing in dyslexic and normal reading children［J］. Neuroreport, 1999, 10(16): 3459-3465. ［33］NEWMAN S D, JUST M A, KELLER T A, et al. Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca’s area［J］. Cognitive Brain Research, 2003, 16(2): 297-307. ［34］MECHELLI A, CRINION J T, LONG S, et al. Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neuronal interactions［J］. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2005, 17(11): 1753-1765. ［35］SANES J N, DONOGHUE J P. Plasticity and primary motor cortex［J］. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2000, 23(1): 393-415.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉