Observed Environment Response Caused by Construction of Double-Line Parallel Pipe Jacking Crossing over Metro Shield Tunnels

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.290

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the field measured data of a double-line parallel power pipe jacking upper span subway shield tunnel, the environmental impact of a short-distance double-line pipe jacking in sandy silt stratum in the process of crossing over the existing subway tunnel was analyzed in detail, including the transverse surface settlement distribution, the development of settlement with time, and the floating of subway tunnels. The results show that the horizontal surface settlement curve of single pipe jacking presents a “V” shape, while the horizontal surface settlement curve of double line pipe jacking is an asymmetric “W” shape. The settlement of ground surface above the axis of the later pipe jacking is larger than that of the first pipe jacking. During the construction of the later pipe jacking, the settlement above the axis of the first pipe jacking is also obvious. The Peck formula has a good applicability in predicting surface settlement curve caused by pipe-jacking construction. For single-line pipe-jacking, the width parameter of settlement trough is 0.79, and the ground loss ratio is 1.6%. For double-line pipe jacking, the width parameter of settlement trough of the first and later pipe jacking are 0.74 and 0.58 respectively, and the former is 1.28 times of the latter. The soil loss ratio of the first and the second pipe jacking are 2.41% and 3.11% respectively, and the latter is 1.29 times of the former. Pipe jacking causes the vertical displacement distribution curve of the “W” shape in the longitudinal direction of the underlying subway tunnel. There is a lag in the up-floating of the tunnel after the completion of pipe jacking crossing. The longitudinal influence range of the parallel pipe jacking construction on the subway shield tunnel is about 4~6 times the pipe jacking diameter. The instantaneous settlement generated by the later pipe jacking across the monitoring section is greater than that generated by the first pipe jacking. The permeability of the undisturbed soil is reduced when the silty soil above the tunnel is pre-reinforced by the metro jet system (MJS). The ground settlement will continue for a period of time after the pipe jacking crossing. The exponential function can be used to describe the development of the settlement with time after the instantaneous settlement occurs.

Key words: double-line parallel pipe jacking, ground surface settlement, floating of subway tunnel, settlement trough, the Peck formula

CLC Number:

TU433

YING Hongwei, YAO Yan, WANG Kuihua, ZHANG Changju. Observed Environment Response Caused by Construction of Double-Line Parallel Pipe Jacking Crossing over Metro Shield Tunnels[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(12): 1639-1647.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Tab.2

Fig.9

Tab.3

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

References 18

[1]	PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Mexico City, Mexico:[s.n.], 1969: 225-290.
[2]	O’REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-Their magnitude and prediction[C]// Proceedings Tunnelling 82. London, UK: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 1982: 173-181.
[3]	VU M N, BROERE W, BOSCH J W. Volume loss in shallow tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 59(10): 77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.011 URL
[4]	孙玉永, 周顺华, 宫全美. 软土地区盾构掘进引起的深层位移场分布规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(3): 500-506.
	SUN Yuyong, ZHOU Shunhua, GONG Quanmei. Distribution of deep displacement field during shield tunneling in soft-soil areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(3): 500-506.
[5]	韩煊, 李宁, STANDING J R. Peck公式在我国隧道施工地面变形预测中的适用性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(1): 23-28.
	HAN Xuan, LI Ning, STANDING J R. An adaptability study of Peck equation applied to predicting ground settlements induced by tunneling in China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(1): 23-28.
[6]	吴昌胜, 朱志铎. 不同直径盾构隧道地层损失率的对比研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2257-2265.
	WU Changsheng, ZHU Zhiduo. Comparative study on ground loss ratio due to shield tunnel with different diameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2257-2265.
[7]	马可栓. 盾构施工引起地基移动与近邻建筑保护研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2008.
	MA Keshuan. Research on the ground settlement caused by the shield construction and protection[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008.
[8]	丁智, 王凡勇, 魏新江. 软土双线盾构施工地表变形实测分析与预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(1): 61-68.
	DING Zhi, WANG Fanyong, WEI Xinjiang. Prediction and analysis of surface deformation caused by twin shield construction in soft soil[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(1): 61-68.
[9]	朱蕾, 黄宏伟. 盾构近距离上穿运营隧道的实测数据分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2010, 44(10): 1962-1966.
	ZHU Lei, HUANG Hongwei. Monitoring data analysis of disturbing effect caused by shield-driven over operating tunnel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2010, 44(10): 1962-1966.
[10]	黄德中, 马险峰, 王俊淞, 等. 软土地区盾构上穿越既有隧道的离心模拟研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(3): 520-527.
	HUANG Dezhong, MA Xianfeng, WANG Junsong, et al. Centrifuge modelling of effects of shield tunnels on existing tunnels in soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 520-527.
[11]	黄宏伟, 胡昕. 顶管施工力学效应的数值模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(3): 400-406.
	HUANG Hongwei, HU Xin. 3D numerical analysis on construction mechanics effect of pipe-jacking[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 22(3): 400-406.
[12]	魏纲, 吴华君, 陈春来. 顶管施工中土体损失引起的沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(2): 359-363.
	WEI Gang, WU Huajun, CHEN Chunlai. Prediction of settlement induced by ground loss during pipe jacking construction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(2): 359-363.
[13]	周顺华, 廖全燕, 刘建国, 等. 矩形顶管隧道顶进过程的地层损失[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2001, 20(3): 342-345.
	ZHOU Shunhua, LIAO Quanyan, LIU Jianguo, et al. Stratum loss during pipe jacking of rectangle tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 20(3): 342-345.
[14]	魏纲, 魏新江, 屠毓敏. 平行顶管施工引起的地面变形实测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(Sup.1): 3299-3304.
	WEI Gang, WEI Xinjiang, TU Yumin. Analysis of site monitoring of ground deformation induced by parallel pipe jacking construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 25(Sup.1): 3299-3304.
[15]	张晓清, 张孟喜, 吴应明, 等. 多线叠交盾构隧道近接施工模型试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(7): 1040-1045.
	ZHANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Mengxi, WU Yingming, et al. Model test on approaching construction of multi-line overlapped shield tunneling[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015, 49(7): 1040-1045.
[16]	林志, 朱合华, 夏才初. 近间距双线大直径泥水盾构施工相互影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(7): 1181-1186.
	LIN Zhi, ZHU Hehua, XIA Caichu. Study of field monitoring on interaction between twin slurry shield tunnels in close space[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(7): 1181-1186.
[17]	应宏伟, 黄兆江, 葛红斌, 等. 基于分级加载工况的沉降曲线拟合法及工程运用[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 51(2): 300-305.
	YING Hongwei, HUANG Zhaojiang, GE Hongbin, et al. Curve fitting method for settlement based on staged loading condition and its engineering application[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural science edition), 2021, 51(2): 300-305.
[18]	汤怡新, 刘汉龙, 朱伟. 水泥固化土工程特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(5): 549-554.
	TANG Yixin, LIU Hanlong, ZHU Wei. Study on engineering properties of cement-stabilized soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(5): 549-554.

地层编号	地层名称	h/m	w/%	a_1-2/ MPa^-1	E_S1-2/MPa	直剪固快		k_h×10⁴/ (cm·s^-1)	k_v×10⁴/ (cm·s^-1)
地层编号	地层名称	h/m	w/%	a_1-2/ MPa^-1	E_S1-2/MPa	c/kPa	φ/(°)	k_h×10⁴/ (cm·s^-1)	k_v×10⁴/ (cm·s^-1)
②-1	黏质粉土	1.6	28.1	0.21	8.75	9.1	27.8	3.1	2.7
②-2	砂质粉土	3.0	26.5	0.17	10.38	7.5	28.8	5.2	4.9
④-1	砂质粉土	8.2	26.1	0.16	10.88	8.0	29.4	4.4	3.6
④-2	砂质粉土	14.0	26.0	0.17	10.64	8.7	27.7	6.5	5.8
④-3	粉土夹黏性土	18.6	28.6	0.21	9.53	10.9	26.5	2.8	1.8
④-5	粉质黏土夹粉土	24.5	34.5	0.43	4.60	24.6	14.3	—	—
⑤-1	淤泥质黏土	33.8	44.2	0.74	3.24	11.7	9.5	—	—

断面	S_max/mm	i/m	K	η/%
DBC-1	34.78	2.60	0.63	1.65
DBC-2	26.89	3.17	0.77	1.56
DBC-3	29.64	3.40	0.82	1.84
DBC-4	31.53	3.35	0.81	1.93
DBC-5	18.14	3.71	0.90	1.23
DBC-6	—	—	—	—
DBC-7	19.2	3.47	0.84	1.22
平均	26.7	3.28	0.79	1.60

断面	S_max,1/mm	S_max,2/mm	i₁/m	i₂/m	K₁	K₂	η₁/%	η₂/%	η_avg/%
DBC-1	56.31	70.41	2.94	2.41	0.71	0.58	3.02	3.10	3.06
DBC-2	44.6	65.34	3.17	2.28	0.77	0.55	2.58	2.72	2.65
DBC-3	49.96	51.21	2.96	2.57	0.71	0.62	2.70	2.40	2.55
DBC-4	55.07	93.83	3.04	2.19	0.73	0.53	3.06	3.75	3.41
DBC-5	37.31	96.44	2.94	2.39	0.71	0.58	2.00	4.21	3.11
DBC-6	28.9	68.01	2.87	2.37	0.69	0.57	1.52	2.94	2.23
DBC-7	29.29	47.56	3.56	2.71	0.86	0.65	1.90	2.35	2.13
平均	43.06	70.4	3.07	2.42	0.74	0.58	2.41	3.11	2.76