Evaluation of Warship Based on Relative Entropy Method

Abstract

Abstract: Warship evaluation during the stage of preliminary design presents a complicated decisionmaking problem. A relative entropy method for overall evaluation was proposed, that could present the comprehensive ability of warship. Regarding the opinion integration problem in group decision, the Hadmmard bulge combination was used to concentrate experts’ opinions, and a decision making method with multiple attributes based on entropy theory was introduced for evaluating. So a new decisionmaking method based on entropy theory was formed which supports both group decision and alternatives assessment with large difference. The new method was proved to be practical and efficient by practice.

Key words: warship overall, target system, group decision, relative entropy

CLC Number:

U 662.3

HOU Yuan-Hang, HUANG Sheng, HU Yu-Long, WANG Wen-Quan. Evaluation of Warship Based on Relative Entropy Method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(08): 1218-1222.

References

［1］朱英富. 水面舰船设计新技术［M］. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2004:79.
［2］曾广会, 朱军, 胡忠平. 基于AHP与MAUT的舰船概念设计评估方法研究［J］. 造船技术, 2007, 278(4):812.
ZENG Guanghui, ZHU Jun, HU Zhongping. Study on warship evaluation methods based on AHP and MAUT［J］. Ship Building Technology, 2007, 278(4):812.
［3］刘传云, 马运义, 许建, 等. 舰船总体效能量化评估方法研究［J］. 舰船科学技术, 2009, 31(3):5155.
LIU Chuanyun, MA Yunyi, XU Jian, et al. Study on quantization evaluation methods for overall efficiency of ship［J］. Ship Science and Technology, 2009, 31(3):5155.［4］赵萌, 邱菀华, 刘北上. 基于相对熵的多属性决策排序方法［J］. 控制与决策, 2010, 25(7):10981100.
ZHAO Meng, QIU Wanhua, LIU Beishang. Relative entropy evaluation method for multiple attribute decision making［J］. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(7):10981100.
［5］钱学森. 创建系统学［M］. 太原:山西科学技术出版社, 2001: 112115.
［6］金菊良, 魏一鸣. 复杂系统广义智能评价方法与应用［M］. 北京:科学出版社, 2008: 513.
［7］尤子平. 舰船总体系统工程［M］. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1998: 61136.
［8］李平. 舰船研制指标体系与评估方法研究［D］. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学船舶工程学院, 2003:4382.
［9］吕建伟, 易慧, 刘中华. 舰船设计方案评估指标体系研究［J］. 船舶工程, 2005, 27(4):5357.
L Jianwei, YI Hui, LIU Zhonghua. Research on index system for evaluating warship design［J］. Ship Engineering, 2005, 27(4):5357.
［10］谢砚青, 张江, 国强, 等. 模糊灰色物元空间(FHW)理论与实践—宏观复杂大系统决策方法［J］. 中国工程科学, 2002,4(11):5766.
XIE Yanqing, ZHANG Jiang, GUO Qiang, et al. Fuzzy gray matterelement space theory and practical application and development——The policy decision supporting system in macro complex system ［J］. Engineering Science, 2002,4(11):5766.
［11］杨善林, 刘心报. GDSS中判断矩阵的两种集结方法［J］. 计算机学报, 2003, 24(1):106111.
YANG Shanlin, LIU Xinbao. Two method of judge matrix concentration in GDSS［J］. Journal of Computer, 2003, 24(1):106111.
［12］Hwang C L, Yoon K S. Multiple attribute decision making［M］. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1981:2956.
［13］Cover T M, Thomas Joy A. Elements of information theory［M］. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2006:4366.

[1]	HUANG Sheng1，GUO Haipeng1，HOU Yuanhang2，WANG Chao1. Group Decision-Making Method for Warship Based on Improved TOPSIS [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(1): 92-97.
[2]	GUO Haipeng，HUANG Sheng，WANG Chao. Group Decision-Making Method of Warship Overall Scheme Based on Improved Delphi [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(04): 515-519.
[3]	WANG Wenquan，HUANG Sheng，WANG Chao，HU Yulong，HOU Yuanhang. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision-making for Ship Passage Arrangement [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(06): 894-899.
[4]	WANG Wenquan,WANG Chao,HUANG Sheng，HOU Yuanhang,HU Yulong. Scheme Generation and Optimal Selection of Principal Dimensions for Large Naval Ships [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(06): 916-922.
[5]	HOU Yuan-Hang, HU Yu-Long, WANG Wen-Quan, GUO Chun-Yu, WANG Chao. Ship Type Selection Based on Group Decision-Making with Multi-objects [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(03): 385-389.