基于改进模态推覆法的导管架平台弹塑性抗震性能

展开
  • 1.哈尔滨工程大学 船舶工程学院,哈尔滨  150001
    2.中国石油大学(华东) 海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心,山东  青岛  266580
刘红兵(1988-),男,湖北省黄冈市人,讲师,主要研究方向为海洋石油装备强度与可靠性.

收稿日期: 2019-07-15

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-02

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51579246);黑龙江省自然科学基金(QC2018056);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(HEUCFJ180102)

Elastic-Plastic Seismic Performance for Jacket Platform Based on Improved Modal Pushover Method

Expand
  • 1.College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
    2.Centre for Offshore Equipment and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

Received date: 2019-07-15

  Online published: 2021-04-02

摘要

针对强震下海洋导管架平台的弹塑性失效问题,提出一种基于性能设计的海洋导管架平台改进模态推覆抗震分析法,获得强震下平台结构的弹塑性抗震性能及其失效模式,解决强震下海洋导管架平台的弹塑性抗震性能评估难题.通过对比分析设防和罕遇烈度8度地震下平台结构弹塑性地震响应的差异性,探讨平台结构的参振振型、振型形状向量以及地震动不确定性对平台结构弹塑性抗震性能的影响.研究结果表明:高阶振型和振型形状向量对导管架平台弹塑性抗震性能的影响较大,需考虑前9阶或9阶以上的模态振型及振型形状向量变化的影响;设防和罕遇烈度8度地震下,平台结构弹塑性抗震薄弱环节均位于导管架顶部,需重点关注;具有相同峰值加速度的不同地震时程下的平台结构地震响应表现出明显的离散性和差异性,建议采用改进模态推覆法评估强震下平台结构弹塑性抗震性能.

本文引用格式

刘红兵, 孙丽萍, 艾尚茂, 闫发锁, 陈国明 . 基于改进模态推覆法的导管架平台弹塑性抗震性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021 , 55(3) : 265 -275 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.204

Abstract

In connection with the elastic-plastic failure problem of offshore jacket platform subjected to a powerful earthquake, an improved modal pushover method based on performance design is proposed. The elastic-plastic seismic performance and failure modes of the jacket platform are obtained to solve the problem of elastic-plastic performance evaluation of the offshore jacket platform in strong earthquakes. The elastic-plastic seismic responses of the platform in 8-degree seismic fortification and rare intensity are calculated by using different methods, and the differences between these responses are compared. Besides, the influences of combined modes, mode shape vectors, and uncertainties of seismic are discussed. The results show that the high-order vibration modes and mode shape vectors have a great influence on the elastic-plastic seismic performance of the platform. The first 9 or higher order modes and mode shape vectors should be adopted. The seismic-resistant weak links are located at the top of the platform in 8-degree seismic fortification and rare intensity, which should be paid more attention to. The seismic responses of the platform show significant differences and discreteness in different seismic activities, which have the same peak seismic acceleration. The improved modal pushover method is suggested to be used to evaluate the elastic-plastic seismic performance of jacket platform.

参考文献

[1] 刘红兵,陈国明,朱本瑞,等. 基于能力谱法导管架平台抗震性能评估[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5): 124-129.
[1] LIU Hongbing, CHEN Guoming, ZHU Benrui, et al. Seismic performance evaluation for jacket platform based on capacity spectrum method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(5): 124-129.
[2] LI C, LI H N, HAO H, et al. Seismic fragility analyses of sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges subjected to multi-support ground motions on offshore sites[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 165: 441-456.
[3] API. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Working stress design: RP 2A-WSD[S]. 21st ed. Washington D. C., USA: American Petroleum Institute, 2007.
[4] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011-2016[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[4] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for seismic design of buildings: GB 50011-2016[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd., 2016.
[5] ZOU Y, LIU H B, JING L P, et al. A pseudo-static method for seismic responses of underground frame structures subjected to increasing excitations[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 65: 106-120.
[6] ZHOU B, HAN X S, TAN S K. A simplified computational method for random seismic responses of a jacket platform[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 82: 85-90.
[7] ZHOU X Y, GU M, LI G. Grouping response method for equivalent static wind loads based on a modified LRC method[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 11(1): 107-119.
[8] ZHOU J, JIANG Y, WANG L X, et al. A long-period elastic response spectrum based on the site-classification of Chinese seismic code[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 115: 622-633.
[9] 陈之毅,谈忠傲,楼梦麟. 地下结构抗震设计方法整体强制反应位移法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(8): 1145-1152.
[9] CHEN Zhiyi, TAN Zhong’ao, LOU Menglin. Integral forced displacement method for seismic design of underground structures[J].Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(8): 1145-1152.
[10] KONSTANDAKOPOULOU F D, EVANGELINOS K I, NIKOLAOU I E, et al. Seismic analysis of offshore platforms subjected to pulse-type ground motions compatible with European Standards[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 129: 105713.
[11] Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings: Volume 1[R]. Redwood City, CA, USA: Applied Technology Council, 1996.
[12] Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHPR commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: FEMA Publication 274[S]. Washington D. C., USA: Buliding Seismic Safety Council, 1997.
[13] ZOLFAGHARI M R, AJAMY A, ASGARIAN B. A simplified method in comparison with comprehensive interaction incremental dynamic analysis to assess seismic performance of jacket-type offshore platforms[J]. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 2015, 7(4): 353-364.
[14] CHOPRA A K, GOEL R K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 561-582.
[15] LIU Y, KUANG J S, HUANG Q X. Extended spectrum-based pushover analysis for predicting earthquake-induced forces in tall buildings[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 351-362.
[16] ZHONG J, ZHANG J P, ZHI X D, et al. Identification of dominant modes of single-layer reticulated shells under seismic excitations[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 127: 676-687.
[17] 曲哲,叶列平,潘鹏. 建筑结构弹塑性时程分析中地震动记录选取方法的比较研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2011, 44(7): 10-21.
[17] QU Zhe, YE Lieping, PAN Peng. Comparative study on methods of selecting earthquake ground motions for nonlinear time history analyses of building structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(7): 10-21.
文章导航

/