基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

隧道上方基坑开挖卸载不可避免引发隧道上浮变形,门式抗浮框架作为一种抗浮措施,其抗浮机理尚不明确.以某隧道长距离共线基坑工程为依托,对门式抗浮框架施作过程以及基坑大面积开挖对下卧盾构隧道的影响进行数值模拟研究,探究门式抗浮框架与地层相互作用机制及抗浮效果,最终提出抗浮框架结构优化设计建议.结果表明:门式抗浮框架施作过程竖井开挖可引发隧道上浮变形,通过竖井跳挖及回填可有效控制其引起的隧道变形;基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖使隧道上浮量从无抗浮框架的19.5 mm减小至15 mm;抗浮板和抗拔桩连接处在基坑开挖阶段存在应力集中,属于结构薄弱部位,应做局部加强处理.

关键词: 门式抗浮框架, 桩土相互作用, 施工扰动, 抗浮机理, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The excavation of foundation pit above the existing metro tunnel inevitably leads to the uplift of the tunnel. As an anti-uplift measure, the anti-uplift portal frame is still lack of research. Based on a foundation pit excavation project colinear with tunnel for long-distance, the excavation influence on the underlying shield tunnel during the construction process of anti-uplift portal frame and the foundation pit excavation was studied via numerical simulation. The interaction mechanism between the anti-uplift portal frame and ground as well as the anti-uplift effect were analyzed. Finally, a structural optimization design was proposed based on the simulation. The results show that the tunnel may be uplifted due to the shaft excavation during the construction of the anti-uplift portal frame and the uplift can be effectively restricted by backfilling and sectional excavation. Compared to the excavation without the anti-uplift portal frame, the uplift value of the tunnel decreases from 19.5 mm to 15 mm because of the restriction of the anti-uplift portal frame. The connection between the slabs and piles are weak positions of the structure due to the stress concentration and it is necessary to do a local reinforcement treatment in the connection.

Key words: anti-uplift portal frame, pile-soil interaction mechanism, construction disturbance, anti-uplift mechanism, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU753
U456.3

吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.

WU Huaina, FENG Donglin, LIU Yuan, LAN Ganzhou, CHEN Renpeng. Anti-Uplift Portal Frame in Control of Underlying Tunnel Deformation Induced by Foundation Pit Excavation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.

图/表 22

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

图6

表4

表5

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

参考文献 11

[1]	CHEN R P, TANG L J, LING D S, et al. Face stability analysis of shallow shield tunnels in dry sandy ground using the discrete element method[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(2): 187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.11.003 URL
[2]	CHEN W C, SONG Z P, TIAN W, et al. Shield tunnel uplift and deformation characterization: A case study from Zhengzhou Metro[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79(9): 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.05.002 URL
[3]	陈拴, 吴怀娜, 陈仁朋, 等. 上方长距离基坑开挖引起的共线隧道变形研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 698-706.
	CHEN Shuan, WU Huaina, CHEN Renpeng, et al. Deformation of a collinear tunnel induced by overlying long-distance excavation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(6): 698-706.
[4]	吴怀娜, 许烨霜, 沈水龙, 等. 软土地区基坑降水对下方越江隧道的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2012, 46(1): 53-57.
	WU Huaina, XU Yeshuang, SHEN Shuilong, et al. Effect of dewatering on the existing river-crossing tunnel in soft ground[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2012, 46(1): 53-57.
[5]	刘建航, 刘国彬, 范益群. 软土基坑工程中时空效应理论与实践(上)[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 1999(3): 7-12.
	LIU Jianhang, LIU Guobin, FAN Yiqun. The theory and its practice by using the rule of time-space effect in soft soil excavation[J]. Underground Engineering and Tunnels, 1999(3): 7-12.
[6]	LI M G, ZHANG Z J, CHEN J J, et al. Zoned and staged construction of an underground complex in Shanghai soft clay[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 67: 187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.04.016 URL
[7]	WU H N, ZHANG P, CHEN R, et al. Ground response to horizontal spoil discharge jet grouting with impacts on the existing tunnels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(7): 05020006.
[8]	孟凡衍. 软粘土地层施工扰动对盾构隧道和地基工后沉降影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
	MENG Fanyan. Effects of construction-induced disturbance on post-construction settlements of shield tunnel and ground in soft clayey strata[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019.
[9]	LIU B, ZHANG D W, YANG C, et al. Long-term performance of metro tunnels induced by adjacent large deep excavation and protective measures in Nanjing silty clay[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103147.
[10]	胡志敏. 小竖井工法在地铁隧道上方基坑开挖中的应用研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2018.
	HU Zhimin. Application of small shaft construction method in foundation pit excavation above metro tunnel[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2018.
[11]	唐文冲. 正上方基坑开挖对运营地铁隧道上浮影响与防控研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	TANG Wenchong. Impact and prevention of excavating foundation pit directly above operating subway[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.

土层	γ/(kN·m^-3)	e₀	E_s/MPa	w/%	k_v/(m·d^-1)	c/kPa	φ/(°)
素填土①₁	17.5	1.89	1.88	67.5	0.2	10	16
填砂①₂	19	-	-	13.1	10	0	25
粗砂⑤₂	20	-	2.66	13.5	10	0	30
砾质黏性土⑧	17.7	1	9	33.3	0.08	23	23.5
全风化花岗岩⑨₁	19.5	0.87	13	27.6	0.1	30	27.5

土层	γ/ (kN·m^-3)	E/ MPa	c/ kPa	φ/(°)	μ	本构模型
素填土	17.5	18.8	10	16	0.3	莫尔-库伦
砾质黏性土	17.7	90	23	23.5	0.28	莫尔-库伦
全风化花岗岩	19.5	130	30	27.5	0.28	莫尔-库伦

结构	单元类型	γ/(kN·m^-3)	E/GPa	μ	本构模型
隧道衬砌	实体单元	25	24.15	0.2	线弹性
井壁支护	实体单元	24	24	0.2	线弹性
抗拔桩	实体单元	24	30	0.2	线弹性
抗浮板	实体单元	24	30	0.2	线弹性
竖井支撑	梁单元	78.5	206	0.3	线弹性

施工步	工况
1	地应力平衡
2	激活抗拔桩和竖井井壁
3	第1层土体开挖(2.5 m) 施作第1道支撑
4	第2层土体开挖(2.5 m) 施作第2道支撑
5	第3、4层土体开挖(2.5 m+2.5 m) 施作第3道支撑
6	第5、6层土体开挖(2.5 m+2.5 m) 施作第4道支撑,激活抗浮板
7	加面荷载模拟回填(竖井内土重264.48 kN/m²)

施工步	工况
1	地应力平衡
2	步长1区域的土体逐层开挖(每层2.5 m,共6层)
3	步长1区域施加面荷载模拟底板(底板自重28.8 kN/m²)
4	步长2区域的土体逐层开挖;同时施加步长1范围内侧墙等结构面荷载
5	步长2区域施加面荷载模拟底板
6	步长3区域的土体逐层开挖;同时施加步长2范围内侧墙等结构面荷载
…	…