短峰波作用下饱和海床中的单桩响应分析

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2016.11.013

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (11): 1737-1741.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2016.11.013

所属专题：王建华教授学报发文专辑

• • 上一篇

短峰波作用下饱和海床中的单桩响应分析

胡翔¹(), 陈锦剑¹^,²(), 王建华¹^,²

^1.上海交通大学土木工程系
^2.上海交通大学海洋工程国家重点实验室，上海　200240

收稿日期:2015-12-14 出版日期:2016-11-01 发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:胡翔（1990-)，男，湖北宜昌市人，硕士生，研究方向为岩土工程，E-mail:hxbksjtu@sjtu.edu.cn.|陈锦剑(联系人），男，博士，副教授，E-mail:chenjj@sjtu.edu.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41372282);上海市浦江人才计划项目(13PJD017)

Analysis of a Single Pile Response in a Saturated Seabed Under Short-Crested Wave

HU Xiang¹(), CHEN Jingjian¹^,²(), WANG Jianhua¹^,²

^1.Department of Civil Engineering
^2.State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2015-12-14 Online:2016-11-01 Published:2021-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用准静态三维数值分析方法直接模拟短峰波作用于海床表面与桩身的三维波压力分布，在考虑了海床土体的流固耦合和桩土界面的接触特征的基础上，研究了短峰波荷载作用下饱和砂质海床中的单桩响应问题．根据数值分析结果，研究了波浪荷载作用下土体的孔压变化规律、桩柱的位移和弯矩分布情况，探讨了桩土接触面不同处理方式的影响，并与自由海床和完全埋置单桩的模型结果进行比较．结果表明：泥线附近与桩端处土体的响应局部现象明显；采用桩土耦合模型时，孔压与弯矩响应相比于接触面模型有放大效应，而位移响应则正好相反．完全埋置桩在波浪作用下的响应主要受海床影响，在桩柱伸出海面的模型中，波浪荷载在桩柱上的影响起主导作用．

关键词: 短峰波, 饱和砂质海床, 单桩, 接触面, 相互作用, 桩土耦合

Abstract:

A 3D FEM model of a single pile in saturated sandy seabed was proposed to study the reponse of pile. Meanwhile, the quasi-static method and fluid-soil coupling and contact behavior on interface was considered. Based on numerical results, responses of the pore water pressure and stress of seabed soil under wave was studied, and the deformation and internal force of the single pile were discussed. Besides, two different methods to model the pile-soil interface were discussed with a comparison of the free field seabed model and seabed model with a totally embeded pile. The results show that the pore water pressure increases significantly near the mudline and bottom of pile. Responses of pore pressure and bending moment are evidently larger in the coupling model, but the displacement response is smaller. Moreover, the totally embeded pile model is mainly affected by seabed, as the wave dominatedly acts on the model with a pile out of the seabed.

Key words: short-crested wave, saturated sandy seabed, single pile, interface, interaction, pile and soil couple

中图分类号:

TU473

胡翔, 陈锦剑, 王建华. 短峰波作用下饱和海床中的单桩响应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(11): 1737-1741.

HU Xiang, CHEN Jingjian, WANG Jianhua. Analysis of a Single Pile Response in a Saturated Seabed Under Short-Crested Wave[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(11): 1737-1741.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 13

[1]	BEA R G, WRIGHT S G. Wave-induced slides in south pass block 70, Mississippi Delta[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 109(4): 619-644.
[2]	赵刚. 胜利作业三号平台“9·7”倾斜事故分析[J]. 现代职业安全, 2011(7): 100-102.
	ZHAO Gang. Case study about“9·7”inclination of the Shengli No. 3work platform[J]. Mordern occupation safety, 2011(7): 100-102.
[3]	YAMAMOTO T, KONING H L, SELLMEIJER H, et al. On the response of a pore-elastic bed to water waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 87(1): 193-206.
[4]	JENG D S, HSU J R C. Wave-induced soil response in a nearly saturated seabed of finite thickness[J]. Geotechnique, 1996, 46(3): 427-440.
[5]	TSAI C P, Wave-induced liquefaction potential in a porous seabed in front of a breakwater[J]. Ocean Eng, 1997, 24(10): 887-917.
[6]	BHATTACHARYA S. Experimental validation of soil-structure interaction of offshore wind turbines[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 805-816.
[7]	LI X J, GAO F P, YANG B. Wave-induced pore pressure and soil liquefaction around pile foundation[J]. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2011, 21(3): 233-239.
[8]	JIANG L, WANG K H. Hydrodynamic interactions of cnoidal waves with a vertical cylinder[J]. Appl Ocean Res, 1996, 17(5): 277-289.
[9]	MORISON J R, O’BRIEN M P, Johnson J W, et al. The forces exerted by surface waves on piles[J]. Petroleum Technol Petroleum Trans AIME, 1950, 2(5): 149-154.
[10]	胡翔, 陈锦剑. 波浪荷载下海底单桩与土共同作用的数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(Z2): 217-221.
	HU Xiang, CHEN Jingjian. Numerical analysis of interactive behavior between pile and seabed soil under wave load[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(Z2): 217-221.
[11]	JENG D S, CHA D H. Effects of dynamic soil behavior and save non-linearity on the wave-induced pore pressure and effective stresses in porous seabed[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(16): 2065-2089.
[12]	HSU J R C. Third-order approximation to short-crested waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1979, 90(90): 179-196.
[13]	中华人民共和国交通运输部. 海港水文规范: JTJ213-98[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1998.

[1]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[2]	宋深科, 夏立, 邹早建, 邹璐. 大型邮轮与集装箱船水动力相互作用数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 919-928.
[3]	李宛玲, 张琪, 周香莲. 风浪荷载共同作用下的海洋桩基动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1116-1125.
[4]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[5]	黎蔚杰, 张琪, 廖晨聪, 周香莲, 刘晨晨. 孤立波和海流作用下单桩基础局部冲刷及保护的数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 631-637.
[6]	刘晨晨, 张琪, 李明广, 周香莲, 黎蔚杰. 波浪与地震荷载共同作用下桩的动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 638-644.
[7]	姚顺, 马宁, 丁俊杰, 顾解忡. 不规则波与顺流相互作用的数值模拟与不确定度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(3): 337-346.
[8]	刘世奥, 廖晨聪, 陈锦剑, 叶冠林, 夏小和. 饱和砂土-结构物接触面强度特性的三轴试验方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(11): 1371-1379.
[9]	胡安峰, 南博文, 陈缘, 付鹏. 基于砂土刚度衰减模型的修正p-y曲线法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1316-1323.
[10]	胡安峰，肖志荣，江进华，付鹏，南博文. 双向循环荷载下的单桩基础累积侧向位移[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 85-91.
[11]	张忆州a, 廖晨聪a, b, 陈锦剑a, b. 椭圆余弦波作用下考虑桩身振动的桩-土相互作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(1): 85-92.
[12]	孔丹雅, 马哲, 王胤, 翟钢军. 二维重力式采样器触地姿态及采样率分析[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 172-176.
[13]	柏君励，马宁，顾解忡. 波流对不同淹没深度水平圆柱的载荷分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(8): 938-945.
[14]	曹雪智，张伟楠，俞勇. 大规模网络关联研究综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(10): 1348-1356.
[15]	刘承江1，王永生1，古成中2. 船-泵相互作用对喷水推进器推进性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2016, 50(01): 91-97.

短峰波作用下饱和海床中的单桩响应分析

Analysis of a Single Pile Response in a Saturated Seabed Under Short-Crested Wave

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价