自然通气状态下半浸桨水动力特性数值分析

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.06.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究自然通气状态下半浸桨的水动力特性，以雷诺时均(RANS)方程求解流场，同时结合流体体积(VOF)方法和滑移网格技术对标准半浸桨模型841B非定常气液两相混合流场进行数值模拟. 数值分析结果表明，推力系数KT和转矩系数10KQ的计算结果与试验值吻合良好，尤其在设计点附近，两者误差均在5%以内. 在尾流场中，空气腔呈螺旋状向下游发展，螺旋的直径先增大再减小，最后螺旋状的空气腔逐渐消失. 由于浸深较小，半浸桨在水平方向、垂直方向上均受到很大的力和力矩. 半浸桨的尾流场以自由液面为界，速度发生突变. 桨盘面之前，半浸桨通过抽吸作用影响流场；桨盘面之后，滑流作用主导流场.

关键词: 半浸桨, 数值分析, 水动力特性, 自然通气状态

Abstract: To study the hydrodynamic characteristics of surface piercing propeller under natural ventilation condition, the numerical simulation on the unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow field of the standard model 841B was performed by solving RANS equation and combining it with the VOF method and using sliding mesh technique. The results show that the calculated values of thrust coefficient KT and torque coefficient 10KQ are in good agreement with the experimental data; especially near the design point, the errors of both are within 5%. The air cavity develops downstream in spirals in the wake field; the diameter of the spiral first increases and then decreases; finally, the spiral cavity gradually disappears. The forces/moments acting on the surface piercing propeller under small immersion condition are very large in horizontal and vertical directions. The wake flow field of surface piercing propeller is bounded by the free surface. The velocity in the wake field mutates in the free surface. In front of the disk, surface piercing propeller affects the flow field by suction effect; whereas the slipstream effect dominates the flow field behind the disk.

Key words: surface piercing propeller, numerical analysis, hydrodynamic characteristics, naturally ventilated condition

中图分类号:

U 661.31

任振1，王超2，万德成1，袁煜明2. 自然通气状态下半浸桨水动力特性数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(6): 636-642.

REN Zhen,WANG Chao,WAN Decheng,YUAN Yuming. Numerical Analysis of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Surface Piercing Propeller Under Naturally Ventilated Condition[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(6): 636-642.

参考文献

［1］丁恩宝, 唐登海, 周伟新. 半浸式螺旋桨研究综述［J］. 船舶力学, 2002, 6(2): 75-84. DING Enbao, TANG Denghai, ZHOU Weixing. Research review on the semi-submerged propellers［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2002, 6(2): 75-84. ［2］MISRA S C, GOKARN R P, SHA O P, et al. Development of a four-bladed surface piercing propeller series［J］. Naval Engineers Journal, 2012, 124: 111-141. ［3］PANARELLO A, SCAMARDELLA A, VIVIANDO M, et al. Model tests and full scale operation with surface piercing propellers ［J］. Journal of Marine Design and Operations, 2003 (B3): 21-31. ［4］FURUYA O. A performance-prediction theory for partially submerged ventilated propellers［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1985, 151: 311-335. ［5］YOUNG Y L, KINNAS S A. Performance prediction of surface piercing propeller［J］. Journal of Ship Research, 2004, 48(4): 288-304. ［6］YOUNG Y L. Numerical modeling of supercavitating and surface piercing propellers［D］. Austin: University of Texas, 2002. ［7］YOUNG Y L, SAVANDER B R. Numerical analysis of large-scale surface piercing propellers［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(13): 1368-1381. ［8］YARI E, GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic analysis of the surface-piercing propeller in unsteady open water condition using boundary element method［J］. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2016, 8(1): 22-37. ［9］GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the surface-piercing propellers for the planing craft［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2009, 8(4): 267-274. ［10］SHADEMANI R, GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the surface piercing propeller for the paining craft［C］∥Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Hawaii: ASME, 2009: 1-7. ［11］ALIMIRZAZADEH S, ROSHAN S Z, SEIF M S. Unsteady RANS simulation of a surface piercing propeller in oblique flow ［J］. Applied Ocean Research, 2016, 56: 79-91. ［12］YARI E, GHASSEMI H. Numerical analysis of surface piercing propeller in unsteady condition and cupped effect on ventilation pattern of blade cross section［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2016, 21(3): 1-16. ［13］施宇翔. 半浸式螺旋桨水动力性能的数值模拟研究［D］.杭州: 浙江大学, 2014. SHI Yuxiang. Numerical study of the hydrodynamic performance of surface piercing propeller［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014. ［14］OLOFSSON N. Force and flow characteristics of a partially submerged propeller［D］. Goteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University, 1993.

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	孙义舟, 孙宏磊, 蔡袁强. 桩-锚复合基础上拔承载力计算和参数影响研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 701-709.
[3]	王树齐1，周念福2，张亮3，徐刚1. 变偏角垂直轴潮流能水轮机纵荡运动水动力分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(3): 373-378.
[4]	付宏勋，赵又群，杜现斌，王强，肖振. 机械弹性车轮侧向刚度的影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(7): 864-869.
[5]	刘荣坤, 李家军, 田从永, 王毅, 冷亚林, 杨建昌. LNG钢结构模块沉降分析及修正研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(4): 240-244.
[6]	邱介尧a, 李国强a, b. 开圆孔波纹腹板钢梁弹性抗剪屈曲[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(03): 357-363.
[7]	赵香山, 陈锦剑, 黄忠辉, 王建华. 基坑变形数值分析中土体力学参数的确定方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(01): 1-7.
[8]	郑轶刊1，张世联1，仓鑫2. 桩腿耦合缓冲器试验模型的数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(11): 1633-1638.
[9]	施瑶，潘光，王鹏，杜晓旭. 泵喷推进器空化特性数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(08): 1059-1064.
[10]	朱信尧1, 宋保维1, 单志雄2, 王鹏1. 海底定点停驻无人水下航行器流体动力特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(04): 573-578.
[11]	金国龙, 王勇, 顾开云. 人工挖孔桩施工对紧邻基坑围护结构的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(01): 84-88.
[12]	丁勇春, 周顺新, 王建华. 深基坑开挖与土钉支护三维数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2011, 45(04): 547-552.
[13]	裴轶群, 李英辉. 二级深拖系统的瞬态仿真及升沉补偿[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2011, 45(04): 581-584.
[14]	沈琦，李永兵，李锐华，陈关龙. 永磁体作用下电阻点焊熔核中的电磁场分布规律 [J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2011, 45(01): 25-0029.
[15]	李成巍, 陈锦剑, 吴琼, 夏小和, 王建华. 灌注螺纹桩承载机理与计算方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2010, 44(06): 726-730.