过冷水滴碰撞过程的实验研究

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2017.08.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前结冰环境的粒径演化研究仍基于常温水滴碰撞结果与实际过冷情况差别大的问题，设计实验研究了常温与过冷水滴碰撞行为的差别：通过水滴发生器产生两水滴链并以一定角度碰撞，其过程通过高速相机记录.实验中水滴的碰撞韦伯数范围为0～100，温度范围为25～－5℃.结果发现，随着温度的降低，水滴碰撞结果发生明显的改变：① 合并区域向分离区域扩展；② 反射分离区域向高韦伯数方向移动；③ 拉伸分离区域向高碰撞参数方向移动.分析显示水滴的表面张力和黏性变化是导致该结果的主要原因.这说明过冷水雾碰撞演化将导致粒径明显大于以常温水滴碰撞模型预测的结果.

关键词: 温度；水滴碰撞；碰撞参数；黏性；表面张力

Abstract: The prediction of droplet size distribution is always based on water droplet collision outcome at room temperature, which has a great difference with that in freezing environment. Because of this, the outcome of binary water droplet collisions was investigated experimentally within a certain temperature range. Two monodisperse droplet chains were produced by means of piezoelectric droplet generators and two high speedcameras were used to observe the collision process. Values of the Weber number based on the small droplet sizes are from 0 to 100. Droplet temperature varies from 25℃ to －5℃. Compared with the outcome at room temperature, the result of the supercooled water droplet collision has obviously changed. ① The coalescence region extends to the separation region. ② The reflexive separation region move towards the region with high Weber number value. ③ The stretching separation region is slightly shifted downward. From the perspective of the supercooled water properties, the influence of temperature on collision results was discussed. The droplet size distribution of supercooled spray has a great difference with the result based on water droplet collision at room temperature.

Key words: temperature; binary water droplet collision; impact parameters; viscosity; surface tension

中图分类号:

V 21

尹金鸽1，孔维梁1，王福新1，刘洪1，杨坤2. 过冷水滴碰撞过程的实验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(8): 939-945.

YIN Jinge1，KONG Weiliang1，WANG Fuxin1， LIU Hong1，YANG Kun2. Experimental Investigation of Binary Supercooled
Water Droplet Collision [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017, 51(8): 939-945.

参考文献

［1］VAN ZANTE J F, IDE R F, STEEN L E, et al. NASA Glenn icing research tunnel: 2012 cloud calibration procedure and results［C］∥4th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. New Orleans: AIAA, 2012: 2933.
［2］THOMPSON G, POLITOVICH M. A numerical weather model’s ability to predict aircraft and ground icing environments［C］∥6th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Atlanta: AIAA, 2014: 2066.
［3］KOLLR L E, FARZANEH M, KAREV A R. The role of droplet collision, evaporation and gravitational settling in the modeling of twophase flows under icing conditions［C］∥Proceeding of 11th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures. Montréal: IWAIS XI, 2005.
［4］BORD S R, HAGEMEIER T, THVENIN D. Experimental investigation of dropletdroplet interactions［C］∥23rd European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Berlin: Freie Universitt, 2010: 198.1198.6.
［5］Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Federal register: Part III［R］. Washington: Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
［6］BRAZIERSMITH P R, JENNINGS S G, LATHAM J. The interaction of falling water drops: Coalescence［C］∥Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. London: The Royal Society, 1972: 393408.
［7］GOTAAS C, HAVELKA P, JAKOBSEN H A, et al. Effect of viscosity on dropletdroplet collision outcome: Experimental study and numerical comparison［J］. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 19(10): 102106.
［8］ASHGRIZ N, POO J Y. Coalescence and separation in binary collisions of liquid drops［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 221: 183204.
［9］ESTRADE J P, CARENTZ H, LAVERGNE G, et al. Experimental investigation of dynamic binary collision of ethanol droplets—A model for droplet coalescence and bouncing［J］. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 1999, 20(5): 486491.
［10］BRENN G, VALKOVSKA D, DANOV K D. The formation of satellite droplets by unstable binary drop collisions［J］. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13(9): 24632477.
［11］O’ROURKE P J, BRACCO F V. Modeling of drop interactions in thick sprays and a comparison with experiments［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1980, 9: 101106.
［12］KO G H, RYOU H S. Droplet collision processes in an interspray impingement system［J］. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2005, 36(11): 13001321.
［13］BUTTERSACK T, BAUERECKER S. Critical radius of supercooled water droplets: On the transition toward dendritic freezing［J］. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2016, 120(3): 504512.
［14］JIANG Y J, UMEMURA A, LAW C K. An experimental investigation on the collision behaviour of hydrocarbon droplets［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 234: 171190.
［15］YI N, HUANG B, DONG L, et al. Temperatureinduced coalescence of colliding binary droplets on superhydrophobic surface［J］. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 4303.
［16］QIAN J, LAW C K. Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 331: 5980.
［17］RABE C, MALET J, FEUILLEBOIS F. Experimental investigation of water droplet binary collisions and description of outcomes with a symmetric Weber number［J］. Physics of Fluids, 2010, 22(4): 047101.
［18］KUSCHEL M, SOMMERFELD M. Investigation of droplet collisions for solutions with different solids content［J］. Experiments in Fluids, 2013, 54(2): 117.
［19］HALLETT J. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of supercooled water［J］. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 1963, 82(6): 1046.
［20］VARGAFTIK N B, VOLKOV B N, VOLJAK L D. International tables of the surface tension of water［J］. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1983, 12(3): 817820.
［21］PLANCHETTE C, LORENCEAU E, BRENN G. The onset of fragmentation in binary liquid drop collisions［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 702: 525.

[1]	赵子任1, 杜世昌1, 黄德林1, 任斐2, 梁鑫光2. 多工序制造系统暂态阶段产品质量#br# 马尔科夫建模与瓶颈分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(10): 1166-1173.
[2]	周鹏辉, 马红占, 陈东萍, 陈梦月, 褚学宁. 基于模糊随机故障模式与影响分析的#br# 产品再设计模块识别[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(10): 1189-1195.
[3]	李昌玺1, 2, 周焰1, 林菡3, 李灵芝1, 郭戈1. 基于MIMOFNN模型的弹道导弹目标#br# 时空序贯融合识别方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1138-.
[4]	冯明月, 何明浩, 韩俊, 郁春来. 基于协方差拟合旋转不变子空间信号参数#br# 估计算法的高分辨到达角估计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1145-.
[5]	杨平1，盛杰1，王禹程2，李柱永1，金之俭1，洪智勇1. YBa2Cu3O7δ超导带材非均匀性对失超传播特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(9): 1090-1096.
[6]	王星, 周一鹏, 田元荣, 陈游, 周东青, 贺继渊. 基于改进遗传算法和SinChirplet原子的调频#br# 雷达信号稀疏分解[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1124-1130.
[7]	张良俊1, 2, 李晓慈1, 吴静怡1, 蔡爱峰1. 大型空间展开机构微重力环境模拟#br# 悬吊装置热结构耦合分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(8): 954-961.
[8]	夏海亮1, 2, 刘亚坤1, 2, 刘全桢3, 刘宝全3, 傅正财1, 2. 长持续时间雷电流分量作用下电极形状#br# 对金属烧蚀特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(8): 903-908.
[9]	谷家扬, 谢玉林, 陶延武, 黄祥宏, 吴介. 新型浮式钻井生产储油平台#br# 涡激运动数值模拟及试验研究 [J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(7): 878-885.
[10]	林达, 朱益佳, 魏小栋, 王志宇, 张武高. 喷油参数对聚甲氧基二甲醚/柴油发动机燃烧及其#br# 颗粒物排放的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(7): 787-795.
[11]	孟庆阳1, 阎威武1, 胡勇1, 程建林1, 陈世和2, 张曦2. 基于子空间方法的超超临界机组#br# 过热蒸汽系统模型辨识[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(6): 672-678.
[12]	蒋华军a, 蔡艳a, b, 李超豪a, 李芳a, b, 华学明a, b. 基于改进Sobel算法的焊缝X射线图像#br# 气孔识别方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(6): 665-671.
[13]	董冠华,殷勤,殷国富,向召伟. 机床结合部耦合动刚度的辨识与建模[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1263-1434.
[14]	谢启江，余海东. 硬岩掘进机刀盘载荷与撑靴接触界面刚度的耦合关系[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1269-1275.
[15]	仲健林1，马大为1，任杰1，李士军2，王旭3. 基于平面应变假设的橡胶圆筒静态受压分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1276-1280.