隧道锚抗拔作用机理的室内模型试验

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：通过室内模型试验对隧道锚的抗拔作用机理和承载能力进行了研究，设计加工了隧道锚室内模型装置，通过多种配比材料的强度和变形试验确定了用于模拟隧道锚区现场围岩的相似材料，采用多种监测手段进行了隧道锚拉拔荷载作用下地表和围岩内部的变形、应变和应力监测.结果表明：在拉拔荷载的作用下，锚塞体顶部靠近地表的岩体先进入拉破坏，随着锚塞体的传力作用，锚塞体与围岩接触部位侧摩阻力逐渐达到极限，然后荷载逐渐传递到围岩内部，锚塞体附近围岩进入剪切破坏，个别部位为拉破坏，围岩破坏形态为从锚塞体底部向上发散的倒锥型破坏面.隧道锚承载能力由两部分组成:① 锚塞体和围岩接触面的极限摩阻力;② 围岩剪切拉破坏的极限阻力，即夹持效应.50倍设计缆力下围岩处于弹性阶段，这表明目前的隧道锚设计是偏于保守的，存在进一步优化的空间.

关键词: , 隧道锚, 室内模型试验, 抗拔作用机理, 剪切拉破坏, 承载力

Abstract:

Abstract： A laboratory model test of tunnel anchorage was conducted to investigate its pullout mechanism and bearing capacity. First, a laboratory model test device was designed and produced. Second, through the strength and deformation test, the material ratio was determined to simulate tunnel rock. Third, the surface and rock deformation, strain and stress were measured during the entire test process. The results show that, under pulling loads, tensile failure first occurs in top surface rock near the anchorage, then shear failure occurs in the rock around the anchorage. The failure surface is inverted cone from the anchorage bottom. The bearing capacity of the tunnel anchorage consists of two parts. The first part is the ultimate friction resistance in the interface of anchorage and rock while the second part is the rock sheartensile resistancenamely clamping effect. Under 50 times design cable force, the tunnel rock is in elastic stage, suggesting that the current tunnel anchorage design is quite conservative and can be further optimized.

Key words: tunnel anchorage, laboratory model test, pullout mechanism, shear-tensile failure, bearing capacity

中图分类号:

TU 42

汤华，熊晓荣，吴振君，袁从华，邓琴. 隧道锚抗拔作用机理的室内模型试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(07): 935-939.

TANG Hua,XIONG Xiaorong,WU Zhenjun,YUAN Conghua,Deng Qin. Laboratory Model Test Study of Pullout Mechanism of Tunnel Anchorage[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(07): 935-939.

参考文献

［1］夏才初，程鸿鑫，李荣强．广东虎门大桥东锚碇现场结构模型试验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，1997,16（6）：571576.

XIA Caichu, CHENG Hongxin, LI Rongqiang. Testing study on field structure model of the east anchorage of Guangdong Humen bridge［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1997,16(6):571576.

［2］董志宏,张奇华,丁秀丽,等. 矮寨悬索桥隧道锚碇稳定性数值分析［J］. 长江科学院院报,2005,22（6):6064.

DONG Zhihong, ZHANG Qihua, DING Xiuli,et al.Numerical analysis of rockmass stability in tunnel anchoring of aizhai bridge［J］. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2005,22（6):6064.

［3］朱玉,卫军,李昊,等. 大跨径悬索桥隧道锚变位分析［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(19):190195.

ZHU Yu, WEI Jun, LI Hao, et al. Analysis of displacements of tunneltype anchorage for a largespan suspension bridge［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005,24(19):190195.

［4］张利洁,黄正加,丁秀丽. 四渡河特大桥隧道锚碇三维弹塑性数值分析［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(Sup.2):49714974.

ZHANG Lijie, HUANG Zhengjia, DING Xiuli. Numerical analysis with flac 3D of tunnel anchorage of sidu river bridge［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004,23(Sup.2):49714974.

［5］胡波,赵海滨,王思敬,等. 隧道锚围岩拉拔模型试验研究及数值模拟［J］. 岩土力学,2009,30(6):15751582.

HU Bo, ZHAO Haibin,WANG Sijing, et al. Pullout model test for tunnel anchorage and numerical analysis［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009,30(6):15751582.

［6］邬爱清,彭元诚,黄正加,等. 超大跨度悬索桥隧道锚承载特性的岩石力学综合研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(3):433441.

WU Aiqing,PENG Yuancheng,HUANG Zhengjia, et al.Rock mechanics comprehensive study of bearing capacity characteristics of tunnel anchorage for superlarge span suspension bridge［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(3): 433441.

［7］朱杰兵,邬爱清,黄正加,等.四渡河特大悬索桥隧道锚模型拉拔试验研究［J］. 长江科学院院报,2006,23(4):5155.

ZHU Jiebing, WU aiqing, HUANG Zhengjia, et al.Pulling test of anchorage model of siduhe suspension bridge［J］. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2006,23(4):5155.

［8］汪海滨,高波,朱栓来,等. 四渡河特大桥隧道式锚碇数值模拟［J］. 中国公路学报,2006,19(6):7378.

WANG haibin, GAO bo, ZHU shuanlai, et al. A numerical simulation on tunel anchorage of siduhe super long bridge［J］. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(6):7378.

［9］朱玉. 隧道锚设计体系中的关键问题研究与实践［D］.武汉：华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院,2005.

［10］余美万, 张奇华.普立特大桥隧道锚抗拔机理现场模型试验研究报告［R］.武汉：长江科学院,2014.

［11］罗先启,葛修润.滑坡模型试验理论及其应用［M］.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

［12］李晓红,卢义玉,康勇,等.岩力学实验模拟技术［M］.北京:科学出版社,2007.

［13］GBT 502662013,工程岩体试验方法标准［S］.

[1]	孙义舟, 孙宏磊, 蔡袁强. 桩-锚复合基础上拔承载力计算和参数影响研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 701-709.
[2]	王聚团, 戚晓宁, 黄志明. 水下生产管汇测试技术及其改进研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 43-49.
[3]	袁振钦, 邹科, 孙亚峰, 刘刚, 屈衍, 李居跃. 基于时域分析法的动态电缆疲劳分析[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 50-55.
[4]	王娟, 杨明旺, 郑茂尧, 刘凌云, 赵立君. 高强钢在大型半潜式平台组块建造中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(1): 27-31.
[5]	陈欣, 赵晓磊, 王立坤, 肖德明, 张腾月. 深水大型吸力锚建造技术研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(1): 32-36.
[6]	尹彦坤, 易涤非. 半潜式生产平台船体结构关键节点工程临界评估[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(1): 52-57.
[7]	陈培帅, 潘亚洲, 梁发云, 李德杰. 沉井接高过程中砂桩复合地基固结承载特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 707-715.
[8]	ZHANG Shengfa (张胜发), TANG Na (唐纳), SHEN Guofeng (沈国峰), WANG Han (王悍), QIAO Shan (乔杉). Universal Software Architecture of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery System and Experimental Study[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2021, 26(4): 471-481.
[9]	MA Qunsheng (马群圣), CEN Xingxing (岑星星), YUAN Junyi (袁骏毅), HOU Xumin (侯旭敏). Word Embedding Bootstrapped Deep Active Learning Method to Information Extraction on Chinese Electronic Medical Record[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2021, 26(4): 494-502.
[10]	金小凯, 陈锦剑, 廖晨聪. 波浪荷载对单桩承载力影响的水槽模拟试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 365-371.
[11]	李镜培, 徐子涵. 长期受荷桩极限承载力的预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 380-386.
[12]	安庆升, 孙立东, 武秋生. 碳纤维增强复合材料发射筒设计研究[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4(2): 13-.
[13]	KONG Xiangqiang (孔祥强), MENG Xiangxi (孟祥熙), LI Jianbo (李见波), SHANG Yanping (尚燕平), CUI Fulin (崔福林) . Comparative Study on Two-Stage Absorption Refrigeration Systems with Different Working Pairs[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2021, 26(2): 155-162.
[14]	ZHUANG Weimin (庄蔚敏), WANG Pengyue (王鹏跃), AO Wenhong (熬文宏), CHEN Gang (陈刚) . Experiment and Simulation of Impact Response of Woven CFRP Laminates with Different Stacking Angles[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2021, 26(2): 218-230.
[15]	ZHOU Xuhui (周旭辉), ZHANG Wenguang (张文光), XIE Jie (谢颉). Effects of Micro-Milling and Laser Engraving on Processing Quality and Implantation Mechanics of PEG-Dexamethasone Coated Neural Probe[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2021, 26(1): 1-9.