动压浮离抛光盘结构化流道的液流特性

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：针对动压浮离抛光盘流场特性优化问题，提出了楔形、L型、抛物线型3种典型的结构化流道.建立了流场约束数学模型，利用Matlab对比分析了不同结构参数下结构化流道环境产生液体动压的能力，得到了浮力与膜厚关系曲线、压力分布曲线以及浮力与各结构参数的关系曲线.同时，运用Fluent对3种结构化流道环境的流场压强与速度分布进行了仿真.理论计算与仿真结果表明：抛物线形结构化流道产生浮力的能力最强，楔形结构化流道次之，L形结构化流道远落后于前两种；工件安装区域形成的流场速度稳定，有利于非接触式抛光加工.

关键词: 动压浮离抛光盘, 结构化流道, 流场压强, 流场速度

Abstract:

Abstract： Three types of structural flow passages were designed, and flow field characteristics of hydrodynamic polishing base plates in different structure flow passages were studied. A mathematical model of flow field with constraint condition were built based on the liquid dynamic theory, and Matlab was used to compare and analyze the distributions of liquid dynamic pressure at different structural parameters. Relationships between buoyancy and film thickness, pressure distribution, structural parameters were obtained. Fluent software was used to calculate the pressure and speed distribution of flow fields. Theoretical and numerical results show that the largest buoyancy is produced by the parabolic structure flow passage，followed by the wedge structure flow passage, while the L structure flow passage is produces the smallest buoyancy. The flow velocity is relatively stable in the area where the workpiece is adhered, providing good condition for noncontact polishing process.

Key words: hydrodynamic polishing base plate, structural flow passage, flow field pressure, flow field speed

中图分类号:

O 786

李刚，张利，文东辉. 动压浮离抛光盘结构化流道的液流特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(11): 1606-1612.

LI Gang,ZHANG Li,WEN Donghui. Flow Field Characteristics of Hydrodynamic Polishing Base Plate with Different Structural Flow Passages[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(11): 1606-1612.

参考文献

［1］袁巨龙, 王志伟, 文东辉，等. 超精密加工现状综述［J］. 机械工程学报, 2007, 43(1): 3548.

YUAN Julong, WANG Zhiwei, WEN Donghui, et al. Review of the current situation of ultraprecision machining［J］. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2007, 43(1): 3548.

［2］Mimura H, Morita S, Kimura T, et al. Focusing mirror for xray freeelectron lasers［J］. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2008, 79(8): 083104.

［3］Joshi M, Morea S, Singh R K, et al. Experimental characterization of hydrodynamic nanopolishing of flat steel plates［J］. Precision Engineering, 2012, 36(3): 424434.

［4］Mittal R, Singh R, Joshi S. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication modeling of hydrodynamic nanopolishing process［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2012, 134(4): 111.

［5］Watanabe J, Suzuki J, Kobayashi A. High precision polishing of semiconductor materials using hydrodynamic principle［J］. CIRP AnnalsManufacturing Technology, 1981, 30(1): 9195.

［6］Hung T C, Chang S H, Ding C H, et al. Improvement of residual error in hydrodynamic polishing by recursive error compensation strategy［J］. Microelectronic Engineering, 2012, 93: 2734.

［7］Hung T C, Ding C H. Smallwavelength form error compensation during hydrodynamic polishing［J］. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2011,51(12):880888.

［8］Zhao J, Cao Z Q, Zhan J M, et al. Research on hydrodynamic suspension nanoscale polishing for K9 optical glass［J］. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 2007, 29(24): 257261.

［9］Huang Z G, Guo Z N, Chen X, et al. Microscopic machining mechanism of polishing based on vibrations of liquid［J］. Nanotechnology, 2007, 18: 111.

［10］计时鸣, 於加峰, 洪滔, 等. 槽形抛光工具形状对液流悬浮抛光加工效果的影响［J］. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28（增刊1）：8791.

JI Shiming, YU Jiafeng, HONG Tao, et al. Review of the current situation of ultraprecision machining［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(Suppl 1): 8791.

［11］Hadfield M, Brebbia C A. Tribology and design II［M］. Southampton: WIT Press, 2012.

[1]	赵子任1, 杜世昌1, 黄德林1, 任斐2, 梁鑫光2. 多工序制造系统暂态阶段产品质量#br# 马尔科夫建模与瓶颈分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(10): 1166-1173.
[2]	周鹏辉, 马红占, 陈东萍, 陈梦月, 褚学宁. 基于模糊随机故障模式与影响分析的#br# 产品再设计模块识别[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(10): 1189-1195.
[3]	李昌玺1, 2, 周焰1, 林菡3, 李灵芝1, 郭戈1. 基于MIMOFNN模型的弹道导弹目标#br# 时空序贯融合识别方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1138-.
[4]	冯明月, 何明浩, 韩俊, 郁春来. 基于协方差拟合旋转不变子空间信号参数#br# 估计算法的高分辨到达角估计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1145-.
[5]	杨平1，盛杰1，王禹程2，李柱永1，金之俭1，洪智勇1. YBa2Cu3O7δ超导带材非均匀性对失超传播特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(9): 1090-1096.
[6]	王星, 周一鹏, 田元荣, 陈游, 周东青, 贺继渊. 基于改进遗传算法和SinChirplet原子的调频#br# 雷达信号稀疏分解[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1124-1130.
[7]	张良俊1, 2, 李晓慈1, 吴静怡1, 蔡爱峰1. 大型空间展开机构微重力环境模拟#br# 悬吊装置热结构耦合分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(8): 954-961.
[8]	夏海亮1, 2, 刘亚坤1, 2, 刘全桢3, 刘宝全3, 傅正财1, 2. 长持续时间雷电流分量作用下电极形状#br# 对金属烧蚀特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(8): 903-908.
[9]	林达, 朱益佳, 魏小栋, 王志宇, 张武高. 喷油参数对聚甲氧基二甲醚/柴油发动机燃烧及其#br# 颗粒物排放的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(7): 787-795.
[10]	谷家扬, 谢玉林, 陶延武, 黄祥宏, 吴介. 新型浮式钻井生产储油平台#br# 涡激运动数值模拟及试验研究 [J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(7): 878-885.
[11]	孟庆阳1, 阎威武1, 胡勇1, 程建林1, 陈世和2, 张曦2. 基于子空间方法的超超临界机组#br# 过热蒸汽系统模型辨识[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(6): 672-678.
[12]	蒋华军a, 蔡艳a, b, 李超豪a, 李芳a, b, 华学明a, b. 基于改进Sobel算法的焊缝X射线图像#br# 气孔识别方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(6): 665-671.
[13]	董冠华,殷勤,殷国富,向召伟. 机床结合部耦合动刚度的辨识与建模[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1263-1434.
[14]	谢启江，余海东. 硬岩掘进机刀盘载荷与撑靴接触界面刚度的耦合关系[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1269-1275.
[15]	仲健林1，马大为1，任杰1，李士军2，王旭3. 基于平面应变假设的橡胶圆筒静态受压分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1276-1280.