上海交通大学学报(自然版) ›› 2013, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (09): 1372-1376.
收稿日期:2012-12-05
出版日期:2013-09-28
发布日期:2013-09-28
基金资助:国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2013CB036405),交通运输部建设科技项目(2011318775680),中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZDEW05)资助
Received:2012-12-05
Online:2013-09-28
Published:2013-09-28
摘要:
中图分类号:
詹永祥1,姚海林1,董启朋1,王家强2,贺东平3. 松散体滑坡抗滑桩加固的土拱效应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(09): 1372-1376.
ZHAN Yongxiang1,YAO Hailin1,DONG Qipeng1,WANG Jiaqiang2,HE Dongping3. Soil Arching Effect Analysis of Anti-slide Piles in Loose Media Landslide[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(09): 1372-1376.
| [1]Terzaghi K. Theoretical soil mechanics [M]. New York: John Wiley and Son, 1943: 6676.
[2]Ladanyi B, Hoyaux B. A study of the trap door problem in agranular mass [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1969, 6(1):1140.
[3]王成华, 陈永波, 林立相. 抗滑桩间土拱特性及最大桩间距分析[J]. 山地学报, 2001, 19 (6): 556559.
WANG Chenghua, CHEN Yongbo, LIN Lixiang. Soil arch mechanical character and suitable space between one another antisliding pile [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2001, 19 (6): 556559.
[4]贾海莉, 王成华, 李江洪. 关于土拱效应的几个问题[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2003, 38 (4): 398402.
JIA Haili, WANG Chenghua, LI Jianghong. Discussion on some issues in theory of soil arch [J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 38 (4): 398402.
[5]陶志平, 周德培. 用抗滑桩整治滑坡地段隧道变形的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23 (3): 457460.
TAO Zhiping, ZHOU Depei. Model testing research on controlling tunnel deformation in landslide field with antislide piles [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23 (3): 457460.
[6]张建华, 谢强, 张照秀. 抗滑桩结构的土拱效应及其数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23 (4): 699703.
ZHANG Jianhua, XIE Qiang, ZHANG Zhaoxiu. Arching effect of antislide pile structure and its numerical simulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23 (4): 699703.
[7]杨明, 姚令侃, 王广军. 抗滑桩宽度与桩间距对桩间土拱效应的影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29 (10): 14771482.
YANG Ming, YAO Lingkan, WANG Guangjun. Study on effect of width and space of antislide piles on soil arching between piles [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29 (10): 14771482.
[8]杨明, 姚令侃, 王广军. 桩间土拱效应离心模型试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29 (3): 817822.
YANG Ming, YAO Lingkan, WANG Guangjun. Study of centrifuge model tests and numerical simulation on soil arching in space of piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29 (3): 817822.
[9]吕庆, 孙红月, 尚岳全. 抗滑桩桩后土拱形状及影响因素[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2010, 42 (4): 629633.
L Qing, SUN Hongyue, SHANG Yuequan. Shape of soil arch behind antislide piles and its major influence factors [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010, 42 (4): 629633.
[10]刘钦, 李地元, 刘志祥, 等. 水平推力作用下抗滑桩间土拱效应影响因素的数值分析[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 42 (7): 20712077.
LIU Qin, LI Diyuan, LIU Zhixiang, et al. Numerical analysis of influence factors on soil arching effect between antisliding piles under horizontal pushing loads [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42 (7): 20712077.
[11]向先超, 张华, 蒋国盛, 等. 基于颗粒流的抗滑桩土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33 (3): 386391.
XIANG Xianchao, ZHANG Hua, JIANG Guosheng, et al. Soil arching effect of antislide piles based on particle flow method [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33 (3): 386391.
[12]张刚, 周健, 姚志雄. 堤坝管涌的室内试验与颗粒流细观模拟研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2007 (6): 8386.
ZHANG Gang, ZHOU Jian, YAO Zhixiong. Study on mesomechanical simulation of piping with model tests and PFC2D[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2007 (6): 8386.
|
| [1] | 罗丽娟, 任翔, 李晟, 唐涌, 贺鹏远. 基于土拱效应和黄土改进应变楔模型的抗滑桩水平承载力计算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2026, 60(1): 163-174. |
| [2] | 张康健, 胡哲钏, 张志强. 岩层复合式隧道掘进机中心滚刀和边缘滚刀的荷载特征及优化布置[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 857-875. |
| [3] | 杨其润, 李明广, 陈锦剑, 吴航. 同步实施的相邻基坑相互作用机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 722-729. |
| [4] | 董启朋1,卢正1,詹永祥1,王家强2. 土石混合体原位试验的颗粒流数值模拟分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(09): 1382-1389. |
| [5] | 周淮1, 2, 张孟喜1. 水平-竖向加筋土挡墙作用机理的离散元数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2012, 46(10): 1548-1552. |
| [6] | 雷晗, 陈锦剑, 王建华, 朱熊. 大直径砼顶管的管道受力特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2011, 45(10): 1493-1497. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||