不同形式土工格栅加筋砂的强度特性

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2013, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (09): 1377-1381.

不同形式土工格栅加筋砂的强度特性

周小凤1，张孟喜1，邱成春1，朱洪2，王进2

（1.上海大学土木工程系，上海 200072； 2.湖北力特土工材料有限公司，湖北宜昌 443003）

收稿日期:2012-12-01 出版日期:2013-09-28 发布日期:2013-09-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40972192)资助

Strength of Sand Reinforced with Different Forms of Geogrid

ZHOU Xiaofeng1,ZHANG Mengxi1,QIU Chengchun1,ZHU Hong2,WANG Jin2

(1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 2. Hubei Nete Geosynthetics Co. Ltd., Yichang 443003, Hubei, China)

Received:2012-12-01 Online:2013-09-28 Published:2013-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯（PET）焊接土工格栅的基础上，设计了不同形式的土工格栅，通过三轴剪切试验研究了不同形式土工格栅加筋砂的强度及破坏形态，分析了单向土工格栅横肋间距对加筋砂强度的影响，探讨了格栅基本单元内部筋材布置形式对加筋砂强度的影响.结果表明，不同形式的土工格栅具有不同的加筋效果.其中：多向土工格栅的加筋效果最佳，但材料用量最多，为土工格栅基本单元的2.21倍；双向土工格栅的加筋效果优于单向和三向土工格栅；单向土工格栅在低围压下的加筋效果比三向土工格栅的好，而在高围压下的加筋效果比三向土工格栅的差，且其加筋效果随着横肋间距的减小而增强；单向土工格栅的良好加筋效果主要体现于提高加筋砂的黏聚力，而双向、三向和多向土工格栅的良好加筋效果主要体现在于提高加筋砂的内摩擦角.

关键词: 土工格栅, 三轴试验, 强度特性, 加筋

Abstract:

Based on the polyester welded biaxial geogrid (PET25-25), different forms of geogrid were designed, such as uniaxial, biaxial, triaxial and multiaxial ones. By means of triaxial compression tests, the strength property and failure modes of these forms were obtained. Besides, the influence of the space between transverse ribs in uniaxial geogrid on the strength and the configuration of reinforcement inside the basic geogrid element were studied. It can be seen from the test results that different forms of geogrid had different reinforcing effects; the multiaxial geogrid had the best reinforcing effect, consuming the greatest amount of material, 2.21 times of the basic geogrid element; biaxial geogrids performed better in reinforcing than uniaxial and triaxial ones; the comparison of uniaxial geogrids and triaxial ones were different in different confining pressures, that is, in low confining pressure, uniaxial geogrids performed better than triaxial ones, in contrast, in high confining pressure, triaxial ones did better. In addition, the reinforcing effect of uniaxial geogrids increased with the space of transverse rib decreasing; uniaxial geogrids mainly improved the cohesion of reinforced sand, however, other forms of geogrid mainly increased the friction angle.

Key words: geogrid, triaxial compression test, strength property, reinforcement

中图分类号:

TU 46

周小凤1，张孟喜1，邱成春1，朱洪2，王进2. 不同形式土工格栅加筋砂的强度特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(09): 1377-1381.

ZHOU Xiaofeng1,ZHANG Mengxi1,QIU Chengchun1,ZHU Hong2,WANG Jin2. Strength of Sand Reinforced with Different Forms of Geogrid[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(09): 1377-1381.

参考文献

［1］Jewell R A, Milligan G W E, Sarsby R W, et al. Interaction between soil and geogrids ［C］∥Proceedings of Symposium on Polymer Grid Reinforcement. London: Thomas Telford Ltd, 1984: 1829.

［2］Lopes M L, Ladeira M. Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soilgeogrid interaction ［J］. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1996, 14(10): 543554.

［3］杨广庆, 李广信, 张保俭. 土工格栅界面摩擦特性试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(8): 948952.

YANG Guangqing, LI Guangxin, ZHANG Baojian. Experimental studies on interface friction characteristics of geogrids ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(8): 948952.

［4］刘文白, 周健. 土工格栅与土界面作用特性试验研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(4): 965971.

LIU Wenbai, ZHOU Jian. Experimental research on interface friction of geogrids and soil ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(4): 965971.

［5］Abdi M R, Arjomand M A. Pullout tests conducted on clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand ［J］. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29(6): 588595.

［6］Dong Y L, Han J, Bai X H. Behavior of triaxial geogridreinforced bases under static loading geosynthetics for a challenging world ［C］∥Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics. Brazil: Printed in So Paulo, 2010: 15471550.

［7］蔡春, 张孟喜, 赵岗飞, 等. 带加强肋单向土工格栅的拉拔试验［J］. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(1): 5359, 64.

CAI Chun, ZHANG Mengxi, ZHAO Gangfei, et al. Pullout test of uniaxial geogrid with strengthening ribs ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(1): 5359, 64.

［8］邱成春, 张孟喜, 魏伟. 面应变条件下网格状带齿加筋砂的强度分析［J］. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(S2):313318.

QIU Chengchun, ZHANG Mengxi, WEI Wei. Strength analysis of frictional failure of sand reinforced with gridrib reinforcement under plane strain condition ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(S2): 313318.

[1]	俞心晔, 薛鸿祥, 闫书玮. 火灾高温下加筋板极限强度及防护性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 929-936.
[2]	李泽垚, 周洁, 田万君, 裴万胜. 地铁变频荷载循环作用下饱和软黏土累积塑性变形[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 454-463.
[3]	刘世奥, 廖晨聪, 陈锦剑, 叶冠林, 夏小和. 饱和砂土-结构物接触面强度特性的三轴试验方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(11): 1371-1379.
[4]	张孟喜, 马原, 邱成春. 加强节点布置方式对双向土工格栅拉拔特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1307-1315.
[5]	张黎明，李源源，薛鸿祥，唐文勇. 火灾升温条件下船体加筋板极限承载能力分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(12): 1420-1427.
[6]	阮俊杰, 许维军, 陈天一. 长舱段环肋圆柱壳稳定性加强方式研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 244-247.
[7]	陈松坤，王德禹. 基于神经网络的蒙特卡罗可靠性分析方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(6): 687-692.
[8]	刘昆1,2，傅杰2，王自力2，唐文勇1. 面内载荷作用下加筋强桁材结构的损伤变形机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(6): 708-714.
[9]	何仕玖，张晓晶，汪海. 含裂纹胶接金属加筋板的Ⅰ型应力强度因子求解[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2016, 50(02): 251-256.
[10]	邬俊杰, 刘帅君, 陈锦剑, 王建华. 桩土接触面三轴模拟试验设备研究与应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2014, 48(11): 1523-1527,1535.
[11]	庞福振1,3，陈林2，缪旭弘1，姚熊亮3. 无限大正交加筋层合板的隔声性能分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(08): 1090-1096.
[12]	杨坤，梅志远，李华东. 正交加筋复合材料夹层板的自由振动求解[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(06): 863-869.
[13]	李磊，张孟喜. 基于Drucker-Prager系列准则的抗剪强度参数分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(09): 1404-1408.
[14]	王一鸣，张孟喜，邱成春，李林. 交通荷载下H-V加筋路堤加筋效果的数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(09): 1459-1463.
[15]	周淮1, 2, 张孟喜1. 水平-竖向加筋土挡墙作用机理的离散元数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(10): 1548-1552.