基于微扰法的快速声速剖面反演

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2013, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (08): 1286-1291.

基于微扰法的快速声速剖面反演

张维，杨士莪，黄益旺，宋扬

（哈尔滨工程大学水声技术重点实验室，哈尔滨 150001）

收稿日期:2012-10-15 出版日期:2013-08-29 发布日期:2013-08-29
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（11104045），国家安全重大基础研究项目（613110010202）

Fast Inversion of Sound Speed Profile Based on Perturbation Method

ZHANG Wei,YANG Shie,HUANG Yiwang,SONG Yang

(Science and Technology on Underwater Acoustic Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

Received:2012-10-15 Online:2013-08-29 Published:2013-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

传统的基于声传播时间的声速剖面反演需要多次搜索不同声速剖面条件下的特征声线，降低了声速剖面反演的速度.通过一个简单的近似，微扰法将实际声传播时间表示为背景声速下的声传播时间与扰动项之和，从而使得声速剖面反演由原来的非线性优化问题转化为线性方程组的求解形式.实验数据处理结果表明，与传统方法相比，虽然微扰法反演的精度下降了近50%，但是计算时间由10 h减少到了3 s，从而实现声速剖面海上实时监测.

关键词: 微扰法, 声速剖面反演, 传播时间, 特征声线

Abstract:

The conventional sound speed profile (SSP) inversion algorithms based on sound transmission time influence the inversion speed because they have to trace the eigen-ray of every SSP. The actual transmission time was expressed as the sum of that for referenced SSP and perturbation terms, and SSP inversion was changed from non-linear optimization to the solution of linear equations by the perturbation method. The experimental inversion results indicate that although the root mean square (RMS) error is doubled in comparison with that obtained by conventional algorithms, the calculating time can be reduced from 10 hours to 3 seconds by the perturbation method and therefore satisfies realtime monitoring of SSP.

Key words: perturbation method, sound speed profile (SSP) inversion, transmission time, eigen-ray

中图分类号:

TB 566

张维，杨士莪，黄益旺，宋扬. 基于微扰法的快速声速剖面反演[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(08): 1286-1291.

ZHANG Wei,YANG Shie,HUANG Yiwang,SONG Yang. Fast Inversion of Sound Speed Profile Based on Perturbation Method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(08): 1286-1291.

参考文献

［1］Li Fenghua, Zhang Renhe. Inversion for sound speed profile by using a bottom mounted horizontal line array in shallow water ［J］. Chin Phys Lett, 2010, 27(8): 843031843034.

［2］Carriere O, Hermand J P, Candy J V. Inversion for timeevolving sound speed field in a shallow ocean by ensemble Kalman filtering ［J］. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2009, 34(4):586602.

［3］Philippe R, Ion I, Barbara N, et al. Traveltime tomography in shallow water: Experimental demonstration at an ultrasonic scale ［J］. J Acoustic Soc Am, 2011, 130 (3):12321241.

［4］Yang T C, Yates T. Matched beam processing: Applications to a horizontal line array in shallow water ［J］. J Acoustic Soc Am, 1998, 104 (2):12161300.

［5］YU Yanxin, LI Zhenglin, HE Li. Matchedfield inversion of sound speed profile in shallow water using a parallel genetic algorithm ［J］. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2010, 28(5): 10801085.

［6］Munk W H，Wunsch C. Ocean acoustic tomography A: Scheme for large scale monitoring ［J］. DeepSea Res, 1979, 26: 123161.

［7］唐俊峰，杨士莪. 由传播时间反演海水中的声速剖面［J］.哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2006, 27(5): 733737.

TANG Junfeng, YANG Shie. Sound speed profile in ocean inverted by using travel time ［J］. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2006, 27(5):733737.

［8］Snieder R，Sambridge M. Ray perturbation theory for travel times and ray paths in 3D heterogeneous media ［J］. Geophys J Int, 1992, 109: 294322.

［9］郭萌,郭文生.深海剖面测量系统设计［J］. 计算机与数字工程,2012, 40(8):6061.

GUO Meng GUO Wensheng. Design of a deepsea profile measurement system ［J］. Computer & Digital Engineering, 2012, 40(8):6061.

［10］黄益旺. 浅海远距离匹配场声源定位研究［D］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学水声工程学院，2005.

［11］初磊,楼晓平,李世令,等.鱼雷声自导作用距离影响因素仿真分析［J］. 弹箭与制导学报, 2010, 30(1):6871.

CHU Lei, LOU Xiaoping, LI Shiling, et al. Analysis of influence parameter to acoustically guided torpedo operating distance ［J］. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010, 30(1):6871.

［12］何利,李整林,彭朝晖,等.南海北部海水声速剖面声学反演［J］. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2011, 41(1):4957.

HE Li, LI Zhenglin, PENG Zhaohui，et al. Inversion for sound speed profiles in the northern of South China Sea ［J］. Scientia Sinica Phys, Mech & Astron, 2011, 41(1):4957.

［13］杨传将，刘清，黄珍. 一种量子粒子群算法的改进方法［J］.计算技术与自动化，2009，28(1): 100103.

YANG Chuanjiang, LIU Qing, HUANG Zhen. One method of improving guantumbehaved particle swarm optimization ［J］. Computing Technology and Automation, 2009, 28(1): 100103.

[1]	余华兵，郑恩明，陈新华. 基于相参累积预处理的空间谱估计方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(11): 1209-1217.
[2]	郑恩明1，黎远松2，陈新华1，余华兵1，孙长瑜1. 改进的最小方差无畸变响应波束形成方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2016, 50(02): 188-193.
[3]	郭拓1,2，王英民1，张立琛1. 采用特征向量夹角联合概率密度函数的信源个数估计方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(4): 469-473.
[4]	陈晓,李亚安,李余兴,蔚婧. 基于距离加权的概率数据关联机动目标跟踪算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(4): 474-479.
[5]	孙挺1,2，耿国华2，郑恩明3，王萍4. 基于子空间方位稳定性的弱目标检测方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(4): 480-487.