多因素约束的低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差模型

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.S1.24

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (S1): 30-36.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.S1.24

多因素约束的低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差模型

邱康()

中石化海洋石油工程有限公司,上海 200120

收稿日期:2023-07-07 修回日期:2023-07-25 接受日期:2023-08-22 出版日期:2023-10-28 发布日期:2023-11-10
作者简介:邱康(1983-),高级工程师,现主要从事石油与天然气工程相关研究.电话(Tel.):021-20896646;E-mail:qiuk.shhy@sinopec.com.

Drawdown Pressure Model of Low Porosity and Permeability Matrix Sandstone Gas Reservoir Test with Multi-Factor Restrictions

QIU Kang()

Sinopec Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China

Received:2023-07-07 Revised:2023-07-25 Accepted:2023-08-22 Online:2023-10-28 Published:2023-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选择合理的地层测试生产压差时,一般需要考虑井下安全、管柱安全、施工效率等多方面因素.对于低孔渗基质砂岩而言,还需要考虑尽可能地解除近井地带污染、减少应力敏感性和储层伤害等,以获得更高、更准确的产能数据.针对上述要求,在研究基质砂岩储层敏感性的基础上,分析了考虑应力敏感性后井周渗流场和应力场的变化,并从井壁稳定、侵入物返排、产能约束3个方面建立了多因素约束的低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差模型.现场应用结果表明,该模型能够较好地指导低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差的选择,可为测试压差的设计提供理论基础.

关键词: 低孔渗, 基质砂岩, 测试生产压差, 应力敏感性, 井壁稳定, 产能约束

Abstract:

When selecting the drawdown pressure during drill stem test (DST), it is generally necessary to consider various factors such as downhole safety, pipe string safety, construction efficiency, etc. For low porosity and permeability matrix sandstone formation, it is also necessary to consider removing near-well pollution as much as possible, reducing stress sensitivity and reservoir damage, etc. in order to obtain more accurate productivity data. Considering the requirements above, and based on the study of the sensitivity of matrix sandstone reservoir, in this paper, changes of the permeability field and stress field are analyzed around the well after considering the stress sensitivity, and a multi-factor drawdown pressure model of low porosity and permeability matrix sandstone gas reservoir test is established from three aspects, including wellbore stability, invasion backflow, and productivity restriction. The field application results show that this model can guide the selection of drawdown pressure of low porosity and permeability matrix sandstone gas reservoir, and provide a theoretical basis for the design of DST drawdown pressure.

Key words: low porosity and permeability, matrix sandstone, drill stem test (DST), drawdown pressure, stress sensitivity, well stability, productivity restriction

中图分类号:

TE273

邱康. 多因素约束的低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(S1): 30-36.

QIU Kang. Drawdown Pressure Model of Low Porosity and Permeability Matrix Sandstone Gas Reservoir Test with Multi-Factor Restrictions[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(S1): 30-36.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 16

[1]	李相方. 高温高压气井测试技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007: 13-20.
	LI Xiangfang. Testing technology of high temperature and high pressure gas well[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2007: 13-20.
[2]	李相方, 隋秀香, 谢林峰, 等. 论天然气藏测试生产压差确定原则[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2002, 30(5): 1-3.
	LI Xiangfang, SUI Xiuxiang, XIE Linfeng, et al. Discussion on the principals of test pressure difference determination of natural gas reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2002, 30(5): 1-3.
[3]	张海山, 邱康, 李三喜, 等. 基于侵入固相返排的低孔低渗气藏测试压差模型[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(5): 657-660.
	ZHANG Haishan, QIU Kang, LI Sanxi, et al. Differential pressure model for testing low-porosity and low-permeability gas reservoir based on discharged invading solids[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(5): 657-660.
[4]	李传亮, 朱苏阳. 关于应力敏感测试方法的认识误区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 1-4.
	LI Chuanliang, ZHU Suyang. Misunderstanding of measuring methods of stress sensibility[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(6): 1-4.
[5]	李传亮. 低渗透储层不存在强应力敏感[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2005, 27(4): 61-63.
	LI Chuanliang. Low permeability rocks are less sensitive to stress[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2005, 27(4): 61-63.
[6]	罗瑞兰. 对“低渗透储层不存在强应力敏感”观点的质疑[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2006, 28(2): 78-80.
	LUO Ruilan. Queries to the viewpoint low permeability reservoirs have not the characteristics of strong stress sensitivity[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2006, 28(2): 78-80.
[7]	李松泉, 程林松, 李秀生, 等. 特低渗透油藏非线性渗流模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5): 606-612.
	LI Songquan, CHENG Linsong, LI Xiusheng, et al. Non-linear seepage flow models of ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(5): 606-612. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(09)60092-6 URL
[8]	薛永超, 程林松. 不同级别渗透率岩心应力敏感实验对比研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(3): 38-41.
	XUE Yongchao, CHENG Linsong. Experimental comparison study on stress sensitivity of different permeability cores[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(3): 38-41.
[9]	窦宏恩, 白喜俊. 低渗透和高渗透储层都存在应力敏感性[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2009, 31(2): 121-124.
	DOU Hongen, BAI Xijun. Stress sensitivity consists in low permeability and middle-high permeability reservoirs[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2009, 31(2): 121-124.
[10]	罗瑞兰. 关于低渗致密储层岩石的应力敏感问题: 与李传亮教授探讨[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2010, 32(2): 126-130.
	LUO Ruilan. Discussion of stress sensitivity of low permeability and tight reservoir rocks[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2010, 32(2): 126-130.
[11]	HOU B, CUI Z, DING J H, et al. Perforation optimization of layer-penetration fracturing for commingling gas production in coal measure strata[J]. Petroleum Science, 2022, 19(4): 1718-1734. doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.03.014 URL
[12]	陈金辉, 康毅力, 游利军, 等. 低渗透储层应力敏感性研究进展及展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(1): 182-189.
	CHEN Jinhui, KANG Yili, YOU Lijun, et al. Review and prospect about study on stress-sensitivity of low-permeability reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(1): 182-189.
[13]	陈勉, 金衍, 张广清. 石油工程岩石力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
	CHEN Mian, JIN Yan, ZHANG Guangqing. Rock mechanics of petroleum engineering[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
[14]	李允, 陈军, 张烈辉. 一个新的低渗气藏开发数值模拟模型[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(8): 65-68.
	LI Yun, CHEN Jun, ZHANG Liehui. New model of numeral simulation for development of gas reservoirs with low permeability[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(8): 65-68.
[15]	张建国, 杜殿发, 侯健. 油气层渗流力学[M]. 2版. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2009.
	ZHANG Jianguo, DU Dianfa, HOU Jian. Seepage mechanics of oil and gas reservoir[M]. 2nd ed. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2009.
[16]	张公社, 周克厚, 陈恩强, 等. 低渗透地层射孔测试联作的最小测试压差[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 1999, 21(3): 36-38.
	ZHANG Gongshe, ZHOU Kehou, CHEN Enqiang, et al. Minimum underbalance for perforating well testing operation in lower permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 1999, 21(3): 36-38.

样品号	井深/m	原始渗透率/ mD	应力敏感系数	校正决定系数
A-1	3537.84	0.2449	0.04923	0.90632
A-2	3537.91	0.4717	0.05838	0.89795
A-3	4615.00	0.0516	0.02933	0.94241
A-4	4615.03	0.0642	0.04547	0.91553
A-5	4614.88	0.0272	0.04932	0.95618
A-6	4614.90	0.0368	0.03583	0.96683
A-7	3868.76	0.0104	0.07596	0.37192
A-8	3868.79	0.0106	0.02141	0.48270
A-9	4107.19	3.0650	0.04318	0.77655
A-10	4107.29	2.3200	0.07203	0.83605
A-11	4200.02	2.9940	0.04542	0.95029
A-12	4200.12	2.4420	0.05697	0.96357
A-13	4344.84	3.7600	0.07758	0.89382
A-14	4344.94	2.6720	0.08737	0.93239
A-15	3959.66	0.1496	0.09248	0.92553
A-16	4651.48	0.2033	0.07007	0.94654
A-17	4017.46	0.0994	0.14121	0.86962
A-18	4017.58	0.0353	0.10467	0.86083
A-19	4017.59	0.0388	0.05833	0.95138
A-20	4017.66	0.0408	0.03940	0.90013

多因素约束的低孔渗基质砂岩气藏测试生产压差模型

Drawdown Pressure Model of Low Porosity and Permeability Matrix Sandstone Gas Reservoir Test with Multi-Factor Restrictions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 16

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价