切削前角对刀齿线性切削岩石的影响

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.11.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究切削前角对刀齿切削岩石的影响，利用自主研发的刀齿线性切削岩石试验装置对砂岩进行切削前角处于-40°~50° 区间的切削试验.实时采集试验中刀/岩的相互作用力，记录所形成的切削槽形状，收集切削形成的岩石碎块并得到其粒径分布，进而分析岩石碎块的分形特征；同时，利用碎块的分形维数定量描述碎块的粒径分布.结果表明：随着切削前角从 -40° 逐渐增加到50°，切削槽的宽度不断增大，尤其是在切削槽初始形成端；随着切削前角的增加，岩石碎块的分形维数、刀/岩的平均切向力和平均法向力均逐渐减小，且其均可采用切削前角的指数函数表示，平均切削力与平均法向力的比值处于0.56~1.84之间，且无规律性变化.

关键词: 岩石, 切削, 切削前角, 切削力, 分形维数, 碎块分布

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of rake angle on rock cutting, a linear rock cutting device was invented and used to conduct rock cutting experiments with chisel picks on sandstone with rake angle ranging from -40° to 50°. The interaction forces between picks and rocks were real-time recorded. The grooves created in the experiments were captured. The pieces of debris were collected and the size distribution was obtained. The fractal features of the debris pieces were analyzed. And the debris pieces’ size distribution was quantitatively described by their fractal dimension. The results show that with the increasing of rake angle from -40° to 50°, the width of the groove increases, especially in the initial part of the groove. The fractal dimension of the debris and the cutting force on the picks decrease gradually with the increasing of the rake angle. They can be expressed by the exponential function of the rake angle. However, the ratio of mean cutting force to mean normal force remains between 0.56 and 1.84, and seems not be affected by the rake angle.

Key words: rocks, cutting, rake angle, cutting force, fractal dimension, size distribution

中图分类号:

TU 45

欧阳义平a,b,c，杨启a,b,c,d，马健a,b,c，邱一平c. 切削前角对刀齿线性切削岩石的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(11): 1422-1428.

OUYANG Yiping，YANG Qi,MA Jian,QIU Yiping. Effects of Rake Angle on Linear Rock Cutting with Chisel Picks[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(11): 1422-1428.

参考文献

［1］王成勇, 刘培德, 胡荣生. 花岗岩切削破碎过程研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1991, 10(2): 185-196. WANG Chengyong, LIU Peide, HU Rongsheng. Study of granite cutting process［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 10(2): 185-196. ［2］LIU S Y, DU C L, CUI X X. Research on the cutting force of a pick［J］. Mining Science and Technology, 2009, 19(4): 514-517. ［3］LIU S Y, DU C L, CUI X X, et al. Characteristics of different rocks cut by helical cutting mechanism［J］. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(5): 1518-1524. ［4］ACHANTI V B, KHAIR A W, SOC M. Bit geometry effects on failure characteristics of rock［J］. Mining Engineering, 2000, 52(6): 101-107. ［5］COPUR H, BILGIN N, TUNCDEMIR H, et al. A set of indices based on indentation tests for assessment of rock cutting performance and rock properties［J］. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2003, 103(9): 589-599. ［6］KIM E, ROSTAMI J, SWOPE C, et al. Full scale linear cutting experiment to examine conical bit rotation［J］. Journal of Mining Science, 2012, 48(5): 882-895. ［7］BILGIN N, DEMIRCIN M A, COPUR H, et al. Dominant rock properties affecting the performance of conical picks and the comparison of some experimental and theoretical results［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2006, 43(1): 139-156. ［8］BALCI C, Bilgin N, PERGAMON E S. Correlative study of linear small and full-scale rock cutting tests to select mechanized excavation machines［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(3): 468-476. ［9］COPUR H, PERGAMON E S. Linear stone cutting tests with chisel tools for identification of cutting principles and predicting performance of chain saw machines［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(1): 104-120. ［10］EVANS I. A thoery on the basic mechanics of coal ploughing［C］//Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University. London: University of Missouri, 1962: 761-798. ［11］NISHIMATSU Y. The mechanics of rock cutting［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1972, 9(2): 261-270. ［12］欧阳义平, 杨启. SPH法数值仿真三维切削破岩和切削力估算［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(1): 84-90. OUYANG Yiping, YANG Qi. Numerical simulation of rock cutting in 3D with SPH method and estimation of cutting force［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(1): 84-90. ［13］欧阳义平, 杨启, 马健, 等. 刀齿线性切削岩石试验装置: CN103499505A ［P］. 2014-01-08［2017-03-17］. OUYANG Yiping, YANG Qi, MA Jian, et al. Experimental device for linear rock cutting with picks: CN103499505A ［P］. 2014-01-08［2017-03-17］. ［14］JIANG H X, DU C L, LIU S Y, et al. Fractal characteristic of rock cutting load time series［J］. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2014, 2014(1): 1-8.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	40

	来源	其他网站

	次数	40
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	49

	来源	其他网站

	次数	49
	比例	100%

[1]	石慧荣, 王海星, 李宗刚. 考虑非线性刚度的正交切削系统稳定性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(2): 191-200.
[2]	金龙, 易仕和, 霍俊杰, 刘小林, 牛海波. 圆柱型粗糙元诱导的超声速边界层转捩实验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 942-948.
[3]	李丽民1,2 ,张国祥2,蒋建清3. 一种基于分形理论的骨架密实型抗车辙级配检验方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(9): 1125-.
[4]	陈瑜1，2,滕克难1,唐金国1,王丽英1. 二维海面红外图像分形维数最优估计[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(8): 1003-.
[5]	王广，沈昕，竺晓程，杜朝辉. 基于多重分形的湍流风场脉动特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(11): 1417-1421.
[6]	李琳a,余海东a,b,陶建峰a,刘成良a. 变刚度条件下隧道掘进机撑靴液压缸的动态特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(9): 1058-1064.
[7]	程耀楠，韩禹，关睿，徐明，卢真真. 高强钢高效加工层切面铣刀优化设计及仿真分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(8): 1006-1012.
[8]	董辉跃1，谢浚尧1，章明1，孟涛2，苏文龙3，樊新田3. 动态人工热电偶法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(4): 490-.
[9]	李贵龙，杜世昌. 发动机缸体多工序加工变形误差传递的建模与分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(4): 385-.
[10]	付传红, 崔金锋, 王金乐, 张代明, 刘凯泉, 董志滟. 渤海深部岩石全岩和粘土定量分析的实验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2016, 3(3): 175-179.
[11]	欧阳义平，杨启. SPH法数值仿真三维切削破岩和切削力估算[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2016, 50(01): 84-90.
[12]	欧阳义平, 杨启. 圆锥齿切削破岩的切削力估算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(01): 35-40.
[13]	郝培，余海东，赵勇. 虑隧道表面特性的硬岩全断面掘进装备撑靴接触界面刚度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(06): 827-832.
[14]	喻春平1a，郭强1b，廖正彪2，梁志伟3. 岩石表面图像的特征提取和处理方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(09): 1482-1486.
[15]	潘鹏志1, 冯夏庭1, 吴红晓2, 孙峰1, 周辉1. 水压致裂过程的弹塑性细胞自动机模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2011, 45(05): 722-727.