基于离散元的盾构开挖面合理支护压力

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用离散元法(DEM)对无水砂土地层（摩擦角37°）3种埋深条件下盾构隧道开挖面的颗粒流动及渐进性破坏过程进行了模拟，分析研究了开挖面极限支护压力及周围地层扰动分布的变化规律，得到：① 不同埋深条件下，开挖面极限支护压力均出现在开挖面位移为0.06D（D为隧道直径)时，对应支护压力比为10%~20%，砂土强度软化现象导致最终极限支护压力增大.② 支护压力比降至40%~50%为剧烈地层扰动及显著地表变形的触发点.当开挖面支护压力比降低至40%~50%时，地层扰动范围和程度对隧道埋深非常敏感，如埋深由2D降低至0.5D时，扰动范围扩大了3倍，最大扰动程度提高了1倍；地表产生明显大幅沉降.③ 基于极限破坏的支护压力比为10%~20%, 而基于变形控制的支护压力比为40%~50%，虽明显大于前者，但支护压力仅为静止土压力的40%~50%.综合考虑盾构刀盘磨损及地层支护效果，在无水砂土地层中采用支护压力比为40%~50%是一种合理选择.

关键词: 盾构开挖面, 支护压力比, 砂土地层, 离散元, 变形触发点

Abstract:

Using the discrete element method (DEM), the particle flow of dry sand with friction angle of 37 degree and progressive failure in a tunnel workface under three cover depths were simulated to examine the limit support pressure of workface and ground turbulence in sandy ground. These simulations resulted in three main findings. First, under different cover depths, the support pressures evolve to limit values when workface displacement reaches 6%D (D is the diameter of the tunnel), and the corresponding limit support ratio is 10% to 20%; the softening effect of sand after peak strength enlarges the final limit support pressure. Second, severe ground disturbance is triggered when the support ratio is reduced to 40% to 50%, and the disturbance degree and range are sensitive to cover depth: the disturbance range and degree triples and doubles, respectively, when cover drops to 0.5D from 2D. Significant ground settlements occur when the support ratio drops to 40% to 50%. Third, based on deformation control, the support ratio is 40% to 50%, which is much smaller than that basedon limit failure; by taking into consideration both tunneling efficiency and cutters’ wear, it is rational to drop the support ratio to 40% to 50%.

Key words：

Key words: shield workface, support pressure ratio, sandy ground, discrete element method(DEM), deformation trigger pressure

中图分类号:

U 455.43

廖少明a, b，时振昊a，武军a. 基于离散元的盾构开挖面合理支护压力[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(06): 838-844.

LIAO Shaominga,b,SHI Zhenhaoa，WU Juna. Reasonable Support Pressure for Shield Tunneling by Discrete Element Method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(06): 838-844.

参考文献

1］Liao S M, Liu J H, Wang R L. Shield tunneling and environment protection in shanghai soft ground［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 454465.

［2］廖少明，刘建航. 上海轨道交通盾构隧道施工风险监控指导意见(STBDQ010002)［R］. 上海: 上海申通地铁集团有限公司, 2008.

［3］廖少明. 盾构超近距离穿越运营地铁的施工控制研究［R］. 上海: 同济大学. 2005.

［4］廖少明，余炎，程致高. 盾尾密封对盾构周边超孔隙水压及正面稳定性的影响分析［J］. 同济大学学报：自然科学版, 2008, 36(2): 172177.

LIAO Shaoming, YU Yan, CHENG Zhigao. Effect of shield sealing on stability of workface and seepage field around shield［J］. Journal of Tongji University：Natural Science, 2008, 36(2): 172177.

［5］钱七虎, 戎晓力. 中国地下工程安全风险管理的现状、问题及相关建议［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008，27(4): 649655.

QIAN Qihu, RONG Xiaoli. State, issues and relevant recommendations for security risk management of china’s underground engineering［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008，27(4): 649655.

［6］李希元, 闫静雅, 孙艳萍. 盾构隧道施工工程事故的原因与对策［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005，1(6): 968971.

LI Xiyuan, YAN Jingya, SUN Yanping. Reasons and countermeasures of accidents happened during the shield tunnel construction［J］. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005，1(6): 968971.

［7］杨晨, 张佐汉. 深圳地铁二期工程建设期安全事故分析［J］. 铁道建筑, 2013(1): 4548.

YANG Chen, ZHANG Zuohan. Safety accident analysis for second phase projects of Shenzhen metro［J］. Railway Engineering, 2013(1): 4548.

［8］Anagnostou G, Kovári K. Face stability conditions with earthpressurebalanced shields［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 165173.

［9］Leca E, Dormieux L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow tunnels in frictional material［J］. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 581606.

［10］Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra A H. Face stability analysis of circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(1): 215229.

［11］Vermeer P, Ruse N, Marcher T. Tunnel heading stability in drained ground［J］. Felsbau, 2002, 20(6): 818.

［12］黄正荣,朱伟,梁精华,等浅埋砂土中盾构法隧道开挖面极限支护压力及稳定研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 74(11): 20052009.

HUANG Zhengrong, ZHU Wei, LIANG Jinghua, et al. Study on limit supporting pressure and stabilization of excavation face for shallow shield tunnels in sand［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 74(11): 20052009.

［13］Maynar M J, Rodríguez L E. Discrete numerical model for analysis of earth pressure balance tunnel excavation［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(10): 12341242.

［14］秦建设. 盾构施工开挖面变形与破坏机理研究［D］. 南京: 河海大学土木与交通学院, 2005.

［15］Zhang Z X, Hu X Y, Scoff K D. A discrete numerical approach for modeling face stability in slurry shield tunnelling in soft soils［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(1): 94104

［16］Chambon P, Corté J F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: Stability of tunnel face［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(7): 11481165.

［17］Chen R P, Li J, Kong L G, et al. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 1221.

［18］Thorpe J P. Ground movements during tunneling in sand［D］. Canada: Queen’s University, 2007.

［19］陈仁朋, 李君, 陈云敏，等. 干砂盾构开挖面稳定性模型试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(1): 117122.

CHEN Renpeng, LI Jun, CHEN Yunmin, et al. Largescale tests on face stability of shield tunnelling in dry cohesionless soil［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1): 117122.

［20］Idinger G, Aklik P, Wu W, et al. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel［J］. Acta Geotechnica, 2011(6): 105117.

［21］Cundall P A, Strack O A. Discrete numerical model for granular assemblies［J］. Géotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 4765.

［22］史旦达. 单调与循环加荷条件下砂土力学性质细观模拟［D］. 上海: 同济大学土木工程学院, 2007.

［23］Itasca Consulting Group. PFC2D version 3.1.User’s manual ［M］. Minneapolis, USA: Itasca Consulting Group, 2004.

［24］Jiang M J, Konrad J M, Leroueil S. An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(7): 579597.

[1]	应宏伟1，沈华伟1，张金红2，朱成伟1. 水位波动条件下盾构极限支护压力半解析研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(8): 982-990.
[2]	张孟喜1，张梓升1，王维2,吕岩2，韩佳尧2，金琦2. 正交下穿盾构开挖面失稳的离散元分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1594-1602.
[3]	俞韶秋1,汤华2. 有限元/离散元耦合分析方法及其工程应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(10): 1611-1615.
[4]	周淮1, 2, 张孟喜1. 水平-竖向加筋土挡墙作用机理的离散元数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(10): 1548-1552.
[5]	杜欣, 曾亚武, 高睿, 颜敬. 基于CT扫描的不规则外形颗粒三维离散元建模[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2011, 45(05): 711-715.