Celebrating 30 Years

Novel Robotic System with Semi-Automatic Planning and Collision Detection for Long Bone Fracture Reduction

Expand
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 2025-10-29

  Revised date: 2025-11-24

  Accepted date: 2025-12-12

  Online published: 2026-04-22

Abstract

A novel robotic system for long bone fracture reduction is developed to address the drawbacks of reduction surgery in clinical practice such as infection, non-union, and malunion. Compared to existing robotic systems, the proposed robotic system integrates a novel semi-automatic surgical planning method and can perform the reduction automatically under supervision, thereby assisting surgeons throughout the whole clinical process. Besides, the proposed robotic system utilizes both optical tracking data and robot kinematics to calculate the position of fragments during the execution of fracture reduction, thereby increasing tolerance to line-of-sight interruption. Radiation exposure to surgeons is minimized since C-arm devices are not required. Trajectory planning experiments using clinical data from tibial, femoral, and fibular fractures are conducted to validate the surgical planning method, in which the generated path length is shorter than that achieved by existing methods. Phantom experiments are performed to evaluate the system’s accuracy, where the mean translational error is reduced to 0.96 mm and the rotational error about the z-axis is 0.26◦, both meeting clinical requirements, indicating that the proposed system has the potential to assist surgeons with more precise operations, thereby achieving higher reduction accuracy and minimizing the reduction path length for patients.

Cite this article

Wang Zhelong, Li Haitao, Shi Haochen, Chen Xiaojun . Novel Robotic System with Semi-Automatic Planning and Collision Detection for Long Bone Fracture Reduction[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2026 , 31(3) : 721 -733 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-026-2913-1

References

[1] Bekos A, Sioutis S, Kostroglou A, et al. The history of intramedullary nailing [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45(5): 1355-1361.
[2] Rosa N, Marta M, Vaz M, et al. Intramedullary nailing biomechanics: Evolution and challenges [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2019, 233(3): 295-308.
[3] Huang X A, Chen Y F, Chen B, et al. Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures among adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 2022, 27(4): 850-858.
[4] Yap W, Ng J W, Lee M, et al. Lower limb malrotation following minimally invasive plating in distal tibia fractures [J]. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 2024, 18(1): 140-149.
[5] Liu J X, Xu K, Zhao C P, et al. Experimental and finite element analysis studies of a reduction-force reducing traction method for pelvic fracture surgeries [J]. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 2022, 13: 100101.
[6] Patel I, Young J, Washington A, et al. Malunion of the tibia: A systematic review [J]. Medicina, 2022, 58(3): 389.
[7] Hwang K, Ma S H. Osteotomy and iliac bone graft for the treatment of malunion caused by failed mandibular fracture reduction [J]. Archives of Craniofacial Surgery, 2020, 21(6): 384-386.
[8] Rollo G, Pichierri P, Grubor P, et al. The challenge of nonunion and malunion in distal femur surgical revision [J]. Medicinski Glasnik, 2019, 16(2): 1-10. 
[9] Montgomery B K, Cidambi E O, Birch C M, et al. Minimizing surgeon radiation exposure during operative treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures [J]. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2023, 43(7): 414-417.
[10] İğrek S, Şahbat Y, Akgülle A H, et al. Does radiation exposure during pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture surgery change according to the C-arm position? A comparison of two different techniques [J]. Injury, 2023, 54(10): 110962.
[11] Daryoush J R, Lancaster A J, Frandsen J J, et al. Occupational hazards to the joint replacement surgeon: Radiation exposure [J]. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(8): 1464-1469.
[12] Zhao J X, Li C S, Ren H L, et al. Evolution and current applications of robot-assisted fracture reduction: A comprehensive review [J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 48(1): 203-224.
[13] Zhou X Z, Chen Y M, Miao G Y, et al. Computer-aided robotics for applications in fracture reduction surgery: Advances, challenges, and opportunities [J]. iScience, 2024, 28(1): 111509.
[14] Ghosal A. Manipulator kinematics [M]//Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. London: Springer, 2015: 1777-1808. 
[15] Wu X B, Wang Y, Zhu G, et al. Research study of robotic-assisted pelvic fracture reduction [M]//Navigation assisted robotics in spine and trauma surgery. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 159-168.
[16] Huang Y C, Jiao J, Wang J W, et al. Utilization of cannulated screw fixation of Jail and TiRobot-assisted percutaneous indirect reduction technique for AO/OTA type 41B2 tibial plateau fracture treatment [J]. The Knee, 2024, 47: 43-52.
[17] Abedin-Nasab M H, Saeedi-Hosseiny M S. Robossis: Orthopedic surgical robot [M]//Handbook of robotic and image-guided surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 515-528.
[18] Fu Z X, Sun H, Dong X Y, et al. Indirect visual guided fracture reduction robot based on external markers [J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2021, 17(1): e2162.
[19] Lee S, Joung S, Ha H G, et al. 3D image-guided robotic system for bone fracture reduction [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(2): 4353-4360.
[20] Bang H, Lee H J, Lee S J, et al. Clinical usability and efficacy of a robotic bone fracture reduction system: A pilot animal study [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2024, 133: 104242.
[21] Dagnino G, Georgilas I, Köhler P, et al. Navigation system for robot-assisted intra-articular lower-limb fracture surgery [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11(10): 1831-1843.
[22] Dagnino G, Georgilas I, Tarassoli P, et al. Design and real-time control of a robotic system for fracture manipulation [C]//2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Milan: IEEE, 2015: 4865-4868.
[23] Mehbodniya A H, Moghavvemi M, Narayanan V, et al. Frequency and causes of line of sight issues during neurosurgical procedures using optical image-guided systems [J]. World Neurosurgery, 2019, 122: e449-e454.
[24] Zhu Q, Liang B, Wang X S, et al. Force–torque intraoperative measurements for femoral shaft fracture reduction [J]. Computer Assisted Surgery, 2016, 21(sup1): 37-44.
[25] Yang D M, Shi H C, Zeng B L, et al. 2D/3D registration based on biplanar X-ray and CT images for surgical navigation [J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2024, 257: 108444.
[26] Lepetit V, Moreno-Noguer F, Fua P. EPnP: An accurate O(n) solution to the PnP problem [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2009, 81(2): 155-166.
[27] Lorensen W E, Cline H E. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm [M]//Seminal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field. New York: ACM, 1998: 347-353. 
[28] Xu H F, Lei J T, Hu L, et al. Constraint of musculoskeletal tissue and path planning of robot-assisted fracture reduction with collision avoidance [J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2022, 18(2): e2361.
[29] Buschbaum J, Fremd R, Pohlemann T, et al. Introduction of a computer-based method for automated planning of reduction paths under consideration of simulated muscular forces [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2017, 12(8): 1369-1381.
[30] McKibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones [J]. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, 1978, 60-B(2): 150-162.
[31] Li C S, Wang T M, Hu L, et al. A novel master–slave teleoperation robot system for diaphyseal fracture reduction: A preliminary study [J]. Computer Assisted Surgery, 2016, 21(sup1): 162-167.

Outlines

/