Transportation Engineering

Structural Damage Detection and Localization Using Response Difference Transmissibility

  • 王增伟,丁雷
Expand
  • (Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics; Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection and Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China)

Received date: 2021-03-08

  Accepted date: 2021-10-12

  Online published: 2024-11-28

Abstract

In this paper, a novel method is proposed for structural damage detection and localization. The key of the proposed method is the use of the response difference transmissibility (RDT) for damage localization. The RDT is defined to relate response differences of the system to be evaluated and those of the original system. The invariance properties of RDT are also investigated. Based on this, a damage indicator is proposed, and the benefits are verified by a numerical example. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated and validated by finite element simulations and experimental case studies.

Cite this article

王增伟,丁雷 . Structural Damage Detection and Localization Using Response Difference Transmissibility[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2024 , 29(6) : 1126 -1138 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-022-2528-0

References

[1] MAIA N M M, ALMEIDA R A B, URGUEIRA A P V, et al. Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(7): 2475-2483.
[2] CHESNE S, DERAEMAEKER A. Damage localiza-tion using transmissibility functions: A critical review [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013,38(2): 569-584.
[3] BARTHORPE R J, MANSON G, WORDEN K. On multi-site damage identification using single-site training data [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017,409: 43-64.
[4] CHENG L L, CIGADA A. An analytical perspective about structural damage identification based on transmissibility function [J]. Structural Health Monitoring,2020, 19(1): 142-155.
[5] JOHNSON T J, ADAMS D E. Transmissibility as a differential indicator of structural damage [J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2002, 124(4): 634-641.
[6] GAJDATSY P, JANSSENS K, DESMET W, et al. Application of the transmissibility concept in transfer path analysis [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24(7): 1963-1976.
[7] CHEN Q, CHAN Y W, WORDEN K, et al. Structural fault detection using neural networks trained on transmissibility functions [C]//International Conference on Vibration Engineering. Beijing: Tomlinson, 1994: 446-456.
[8] URGUEIRA A P V, ALMEIDA R A B, MAIA N M M.On the use of the transmissibility concept for the evaluation of frequency response functions [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(3): 940-951.
[9] MANSON G, WORDEN K, ALLMAN D. Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part iii. Damage location on an aircraft wing [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003,259(2): 365-385.
[10] CACCESE V, MEWER R, VEL S S. Detection of bolt load loss in hybrid composite/metal bolted connections [J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(7): 895-906.
[11] CHEN Q, CHAN Y W, WORDEN K. Structural fault diagnosis and isolation using neural networks based on response-only data [J]. Computers & Structures, 2003, 81(22/23): 2165-2172.
[12] WORDEN K, MANSON G, FIELLER N R J. Damage detection using outlier analysis [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 229(3): 647-667.
[13] WORDEN K. Structural fault detection using a novelty measure [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997,201(1): 85-101.
[14] RIBEIRO A M R, SILVA J M M, MAIA N M M.On the generalisation of the transmissibility concept [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2000,14(1): 29-35.
[15] MAIA N M M, SILVA J M M, RIBEIRO A M R. The transmissibility concept in multi-degree-offreedom systems [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2001, 15(1): 129-137.
[16] SAMPAIO R P C, MAIA N M M. Strategies for an efficient indicator of structural damage [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2009, 23(6): 1855-1869.
[17] ZHOU Y L, MAIA N M M, SAMPAIO R P C, et al. Structural damage detection using transmissibility together with hierarchical clustering analysis and similarity measure [J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2017,16(6): 711-731.
[18] ZHOU Y L, MAIA N M, ABDEL WAHAB M. Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2018,24(10): 2001-2019.
[19] MAIA N M M, URGUEIRA A P V, ALMEIDA R A B.An overview of the transmissibility concept and its application to structural damage detection [M]//Topics in modal analysis I, Volume 5. New York: Springer,2012: 137-151.
[20] KONG X, CAI C, HU J X. The state-of-the-art on framework of vibration-based structural damage identification for decision making [J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7: 497.
[21] YAN W J, ZHAO M Y, SUN Q, et al. Transmissibilitybased system identification for structural health Monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019,117: 453-482.
[22] LANG Z Q, PARK G, FARRAR C R, et al. Transmissibility of non-linear output frequency response functions with application in detection and location of damage in MDOF structural systems [J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2011, 46(6): 841-853.
[23] YANG W X, LANG Z Q, TIAN W Y. Condition monitoring and damage location of wind turbine blades by frequency response transmissibility analysis [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(10):6558-6564.
[24] ZHAO X Y, LANG Z Q, PARK G, et al. A new transmissibility analysis method for detection and location of damage vianonlinear features in MDOF structural systems [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(4): 1933-1947.
[25] LI X Z, DONG X J, PENG Z K, et al. Local variation detection in MDOF system using wavelet based transmissibility and its application in cracked beam [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2017, 23(14):2307-2327.
[26] LAW S S, LI J, DING Y. Structural response reconstruction with transmissibility concept in frequency domain [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(3): 952-968.
[27] DEVRIENDT C, DE SITTER G, GUILLAUME P. An operational modal analysis approach based on parametrically identified multivariable transmissibilities [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010,24(5): 1250-1259.
[28] FONTUL M, RIBEIRO A M R, SILVA J M M, et al. Transmissibility in structural coupling [C]//International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2004: 2707-2716.
[29] WANG Z W, ZHU P. Response prediction for modified mechanical systems based on in situ frequency response functions: Theoretical and numerical studies [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 400: 417-441.
[30] MAIA N M M. An introduction to the singular value decomposition technique (SVD) [C]//7th International Modal Analysis Conference. Las Vegas: Union College Press, 1989: 338-339.
[31] ALMEIDA R A B, URGUEIRA A P V, MAIA N M M. Identification of rigid body properties from vibration measurements [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2007,299(4/5): 884-899.
[32] PAPATHEOU E, MANSON G, BARTHORPE R J,et al. The use of pseudo-faults for novelty detection in SHM [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2010,329(12): 2349-2366.
Outlines

/