Automation & Computer Technologies

Dynamic Self-Similar kc-Center Network Based on Information Dissemination

Expand
  • (1. Library, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. Department of Criminal Science and Technology, Henan Police College, Zhengzhou 450046, China; 3. School of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 4. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

Accepted date: 2022-04-03

  Online published: 2024-05-28

Abstract

This study mainly focused on the dynamic self-similar kc-center network as a result of information distribution through social networks. Individual attraction with various preferences was characterized in the model as a result of reciprocal attraction among individuals and human multi-attribute. Additionally, the model incorporated the community network structure and network evolution mechanism, and a dynamic self-similar kc-center network generation model was presented. Compared with the classical scale-free network generation algorithm, the generated network embodied not only the characteristics of the small-world and scale-free, but also the characteristics of dynamic self-similar kc-center network. The experimental results were verified by comparing the real data with the experimental data. The results showed that there are dynamic self-similar kc-center networks and their internal network relationship dynamics in the micro scale, meso scale and global perspective based on information dissemination.

Cite this article

WANG Li1 (李树勋), ZHANG Xuyi2 (沈珩云), YAO Yabing3 (刘斌才),HU Yinggang4*(胡迎港) . Dynamic Self-Similar kc-Center Network Based on Information Dissemination[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2024 , 29(3) : 480 -491 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-022-2559-6

References

[1] GODOY-LORITE A, JONES N S. Inference and influence of large-scale social networks using snapshot population behaviour without network data [DB /OL]. (2020-05-23). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07146.
[2] CENTOLA D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment [J]. Science, 2010, 329(5996): 1194-1197.
[3] SMOLLA M, AKC? AY E. Cultural selection shapes network structure [J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(8): eaaw0609.
[4] MATEO D, HORSEVAD N, HASSANI V, et al. Optimal network topology for responsive collective behavior [J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(4): eaau0999.
[5] PORTER M. Small-world network [J]. Scholarpedia, 2012, 7(2): 1739.
[6] BARAB′ASI A L, BONABEAU E. Scale-free networks [J]. Scientific American, 2003, 288(5): 60-69.
[7] LI W M, ZHU H, LI S H, et al. Evolutionary community discovery in dynamic social networks via resistance distance [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 171: 114536.
[8] CHAI Y, XU L, ZHANG H D. Interchangeable outer synchronization of community networks with two spatiotemporal clusters [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021, 574: 126011.
[9] FORNAHL D, BRENNER T. Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems [M]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
[10] CORCORAN C, CLARK J M. Adaptive network modeling of social distancing interventions [J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2022, 546: 111151.
[11] YU X L, NIAN F Z, YAO Y B, et al. Phase transition in group emotion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 8(5): 1143-1152.
[12] SOOKNANAN J, COMISSIONG D M G. When behaviour turns contagious: The use of deterministic epidemiological models in modeling social contagion phenomena [J]. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2017, 5(4): 1046-1050.
[13] DALEY D J, GANI J. Epidemic modelling: An introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[14] HETHCOTE H W. The mathematics of infectious diseases [J]. SIAM Review, 2000, 42(4): 599-653.
[15] GRASSLY N C, FRASER C. Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2008, 6(6): 477-487.
[16] NIAN F Z, DIAO H Y. A human flesh search model based on multiple effects [J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 1394-1405.
[17] MANSHAEI M H, FREUDIGER J, FELEGYHAZI M, et al. Wireless social community networks: A game-theoretic analysis [C]//2008 IEEE International Zurich Seminar on Communications. Zurich: IEEE, 2008: 22-25.
[18] P′ASZTOR B, MOTTOLA L, MASCOLO C, et al. Selective reprogramming of mobile sensor networks through social community detection [M]//Wireless sensor networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 178-193.
[19] SARUKKAI R R. Link prediction and path analysis using Markov chains [J]. Computer Networks, 2000, 33(1/2/3/4/5/6): 377-386.
[20] HUANG Z, LI X, CHEN H. Link prediction approach to collaborative filtering [C]// 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Denver: ACM, 2005: 141-142.
[21] LI A S, LI J K, PAN Y C, et al. Homophyly/kinship model: Naturally evolving networks [J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 15140.
[22] REN Z M, ZENG A, ZHANG Y C. Bridging nestedness and economic complexity in multilayer world trade networks [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2020, 7: 156.
[23] VAN BAAR J M, KLAASSEN F H, RICCI F, et al. Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 18164.
[24] LAFKY J, WILSON A J. Experimenting with incentives for information transmission: Quantity versus quality [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 169: 314-331.
[25] WU Y E, ZHANG Z P, WANG X Y, et al. Impact of probabilistic incentives on the evolution of cooperation in complex topologies [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 513: 307-314.
[26] LINDSTR ¨OM B, BELLANDER M, SCHULTNER D T, et al. A computational reward learning account of social media engagement [J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 1311.
[27] NIE J T, LUO J, XIONG Z H, et al. A stackelberg game approach toward socially-aware incentive mechanisms for mobile crowdsensing [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2019, 18(1): 724-738.
Outlines

/