Automation & Computer Technologies

Dynamic Self-Similar kc-Center Network Based on Information Dissemination

  • 王丽1,张旭毅2,姚亚兵3,尉雪龙4
Expand
  • (1. Library, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. Department of Criminal Science and Technology, Henan Police College, Zhengzhou 450046, China; 3. School of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 4. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

Accepted date: 2022-04-03

  Online published: 2024-05-28

Abstract

This study mainly focused on the dynamic self-similar kc-center network as a result of information distribution through social networks. Individual attraction with various preferences was characterized in the model as a result of reciprocal attraction among individuals and human multi-attribute. Additionally, the model incorporated the community network structure and network evolution mechanism, and a dynamic self-similar kc-center network generation model was presented. Compared with the classical scale-free network generation algorithm, the generated network embodied not only the characteristics of the small-world and scale-free, but also the characteristics of dynamic self-similar kc-center network. The experimental results were verified by comparing the real data with the experimental data. The results showed that there are dynamic self-similar kc-center networks and their internal network relationship dynamics in the micro scale, meso scale and global perspective based on information dissemination.

Cite this article

王丽1,张旭毅2,姚亚兵3,尉雪龙4 . Dynamic Self-Similar kc-Center Network Based on Information Dissemination[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2024 , 29(3) : 480 -491 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-022-2559-6

References

[1] GODOY-LORITE A, JONES N S. Inference and influence of large-scale social networks using snapshot population behaviour without network data [DB /OL]. (2020-05-23). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07146.
[2] CENTOLA D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment [J]. Science, 2010, 329(5996): 1194-1197.
[3] SMOLLA M, AKC? AY E. Cultural selection shapes network structure [J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(8): eaaw0609.
[4] MATEO D, HORSEVAD N, HASSANI V, et al. Optimal network topology for responsive collective behavior [J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(4): eaau0999.
[5] PORTER M. Small-world network [J]. Scholarpedia, 2012, 7(2): 1739.
[6] BARAB′ASI A L, BONABEAU E. Scale-free networks [J]. Scientific American, 2003, 288(5): 60-69.
[7] LI W M, ZHU H, LI S H, et al. Evolutionary community discovery in dynamic social networks via resistance distance [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 171: 114536.
[8] CHAI Y, XU L, ZHANG H D. Interchangeable outer synchronization of community networks with two spatiotemporal clusters [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021, 574: 126011.
[9] FORNAHL D, BRENNER T. Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems [M]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
[10] CORCORAN C, CLARK J M. Adaptive network modeling of social distancing interventions [J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2022, 546: 111151.
[11] YU X L, NIAN F Z, YAO Y B, et al. Phase transition in group emotion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 8(5): 1143-1152.
[12] SOOKNANAN J, COMISSIONG D M G. When behaviour turns contagious: The use of deterministic epidemiological models in modeling social contagion phenomena [J]. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2017, 5(4): 1046-1050.
[13] DALEY D J, GANI J. Epidemic modelling: An introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[14] HETHCOTE H W. The mathematics of infectious diseases [J]. SIAM Review, 2000, 42(4): 599-653.
[15] GRASSLY N C, FRASER C. Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2008, 6(6): 477-487.
[16] NIAN F Z, DIAO H Y. A human flesh search model based on multiple effects [J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 1394-1405.
[17] MANSHAEI M H, FREUDIGER J, FELEGYHAZI M, et al. Wireless social community networks: A game-theoretic analysis [C]//2008 IEEE International Zurich Seminar on Communications. Zurich: IEEE, 2008: 22-25.
[18] P′ASZTOR B, MOTTOLA L, MASCOLO C, et al. Selective reprogramming of mobile sensor networks through social community detection [M]//Wireless sensor networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 178-193.
[19] SARUKKAI R R. Link prediction and path analysis using Markov chains [J]. Computer Networks, 2000, 33(1/2/3/4/5/6): 377-386.
[20] HUANG Z, LI X, CHEN H. Link prediction approach to collaborative filtering [C]// 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Denver: ACM, 2005: 141-142.
[21] LI A S, LI J K, PAN Y C, et al. Homophyly/kinship model: Naturally evolving networks [J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 15140.
[22] REN Z M, ZENG A, ZHANG Y C. Bridging nestedness and economic complexity in multilayer world trade networks [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2020, 7: 156.
[23] VAN BAAR J M, KLAASSEN F H, RICCI F, et al. Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 18164.
[24] LAFKY J, WILSON A J. Experimenting with incentives for information transmission: Quantity versus quality [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 169: 314-331.
[25] WU Y E, ZHANG Z P, WANG X Y, et al. Impact of probabilistic incentives on the evolution of cooperation in complex topologies [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 513: 307-314.
[26] LINDSTR ¨OM B, BELLANDER M, SCHULTNER D T, et al. A computational reward learning account of social media engagement [J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 1311.
[27] NIE J T, LUO J, XIONG Z H, et al. A stackelberg game approach toward socially-aware incentive mechanisms for mobile crowdsensing [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2019, 18(1): 724-738.
Outlines

/