Pressure-Based Approach to Estimating the Injection Start and End in Single and Split Common Rail Injection Processes

Expand
  • (Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Online published: 2018-12-26

Abstract

Fuel injection timing is an important control parameter for engine combustion optimization and emissions control. However, the actual fuel injection timing is different from the nominal one commanded by the electronic control unit, due to the system hydraulic lag or the possible communication malfunction. In this study, a simple estimate approach based on the injector inlet pressure is proposed to capture four critical characteristic instants at the start and end of injection. The critical characteristic moments estimated using this pressure-based approach are validated against those determined by the actual injection rate profiles, in the context of different single or split injection processes. The comparison revealed that the characteristic injection moments estimated by the injector inlet pressures and those determined by the actual injection rate profiles have a satisfactory agreement, certifying the broad applicability and reliability of this pressure-based approach in the detection of the real fuel injection start and end time.

Cite this article

ZHAI Jiaqi (翟佳琦), DUAN Yaozong (段耀宗), HAN Dong (韩东) . Pressure-Based Approach to Estimating the Injection Start and End in Single and Split Common Rail Injection Processes[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2018 , 23(Sup. 1) : 28 -33 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-018-2019-5

References

[1] MOHAN B, YANG W M, CHOU S K. Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—A review[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013,28: 664-676. [2] LI T, MORIWAKI R, OGAWA H, et al. Dependence of premixed low-temperature diesel combustion on fuel ignitability and volatility [J]. International Journal of Engine Research, 2012, 13(1): 14-27. [3] HAN D, ICKES A M, BOHAC S V, et al. HC and CO emissions of premixed low-temperature combustion fueled by blends of diesel and gasoline [J]. Fuel, 2012, 99:13-19. [4] JING W, WU Z Y, ROBERTS W L, et al. Spray combustion of biomass-based renewable diesel fuel using multiple injection strategy in a constant volume combustion chamber [J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 718-728. [5] YANAI T, AVERSA C, DEV S, et al. Investigation of fuel injection strategies for direct injection of neat n-butanol in a compression ignition engine [J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, 9(3): 1512-1525. [6] CATANIA A E, FERRARI A, MANNO M. Development and application of a complete common-rail injection system mathematical model for hydrodynamic analysis and diagnostics [C]// ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference.Chicago, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers,2005. [7] PLAMONDON E, SEERS P. Development of a simplified dynamic model for a piezoelectric injector using multiple injection strategies with biodiesel/diesel-fuel blends [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 131: 411-424. [8] PAYRI R, SALVADOR F J, MART′I-ALDARAV′I P,et al. Using one-dimensional modeling to analyse the influence of the use of biodiesels on the dynamic behavior of solenoid-operated injectors in common rail systems: Detailed injection system model [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2012, 54(1): 90-99. [9] D’AMBROSIO S, FERRARI A. Effects of pilot injection parameters on low temperature combustion diesel engines equipped with solenoid injectors featuring conventional and rate-shaped main injection [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2016, 110: 457-468. [10] D’AMBROSIO S, FERRARI A. Effects of exhaust gas recirculation in diesel engines featuring late PCCI type combustion strategies [J]. Energy Conversion & Management,2015, 105(2): 1269-1280. [11] BUSCH S, ZHA K,WAREY A, et al. On the reduction of combustion noise by a close-coupled pilot injection in a small-bore direct-injection diesel engine [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016,138(10): 102804. [12] LI T, SUZUKI M, OGAWA H. Effect of two-stage injection on unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions in smokeless low-temperature diesel combustion with ultra-high exhaust gas recirculation[J]. International Journal of Engine Research,2010, 11(5): 345-354. [13] REHMAN S. Sensors based measurement techniques of fuel injection and ignition characteristics of diesel sprays in DI combustion system [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016, 55(3): 2391-2402. [14] SEQUERA A J, PARTHASARATHY R N, GOLLAHALLIS R. Effect of fuel injection timing in the combustionof biofuels in a diesel engine [C]//InternationalEnergy Conversion Engineering Conference. Denver,USA: AIAA, 2013. [15] MARCHI A, NOURI J, YAN Y, et al. Spray stabilityof outwards opening pintle injectors for stratifieddirect injection spark ignition engine operation [J]. InternationalJournal of Engine Research, 2010, 11(6):413-437. [16] HAN D, DUAN Y Z, WANG C H, et al. Experimentalstudy on injection characteristics of fatty acid esterson a diesel engine common rail system [J]. Fuel, 2014,123: 19-25. [17] HAN D, WANG C H, DUAN Y Z, et al. An experimentalstudy of injection and spray characteristics ofdiesel and gasoline blends on a common rail injectionsystem [J]. Energy, 2014, 75: 513-519. [18] CATANIA A E, FERRARI A, MANNO M, et al.Experimental investigation of dynamics effects onmultiple-injection common rail system performance[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines andPower, 2008, 130(3): 032806. [19] HAN D, DUAN Y Z, WANG C H, et al. Experimentalstudy of the two-stage injection process of fatty acid esterson a common rail injection system [J]. Fuel, 2016,163: 214-222. [20] HAN D, LI K, DUAN Y Z, et al. Numerical study onfuel physical effects on the split injection processes ona common rail injection system [J]. Energy Conversion& Management, 2017, 134: 47-58.
Options
Outlines

/