A Hemodynamic Study of the Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Enhancing Popliteal Venous Flow

Expand
  • (1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China; 2. Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; 3. Shanghai American School, Shanghai 201107, China; 4. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China)

Online published: 2014-12-08

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has been studied to be a method of prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis by activating the calf muscle pump. However, there is little evidence of the effects of different stimulating parameters on hemodynamics and comfort levels. The objective of this paper is to compare the effects of different stimulating parameters (current amplitude, pulse-width) on hemodynamic alterations of the popliteal vein and the comfort levels in a group of fourteen healthy subjects. Doppler ultrasound detection of peak venous velocity and blood volume were taken from baseline, twelve sequential electrical stimulations and foot dorsiflexion for each subject. A visual analogue scale was used to assess the subjects’ pain perception of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The results showed that peak venous velocity and blood volume augmented as current amplitude and pulse-width increased while pain level also increased. A compromise was reached that parameters consisting of an amplitude of 10mA and a pulse-width of 500 μs would obtain a high-peak venous velocity and blood flow volume with a relatively comfortable perception. In addition, parameters consisting of an amplitude of 20mA and a pulse-width of 300 μs were also shown to be a promising choice. However, further studies need to be done to validate and enrich these findings.

Cite this article

YANG Shun-gang1 (杨顺刚), Gong Xia2 (龚霞), WEI Sheng-kai1 (魏盛凯), GU Xin-feng1 (顾鑫锋), SHI Jeremy3 (施力玮), JIANG Chuan4 (江川), WAN Da-qian4 (万大千), WANG Jin-wu4* (王金武), DAI Ke-rong4* (戴尅戎), YAN Meng-ning4 (严孟宁 . A Hemodynamic Study of the Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Enhancing Popliteal Venous Flow[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2014 , 19(6) : 706 -711 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-014-1570-y

References

[1] Gogalniceanu P, Johnston C J, Khalid U, et al.Indications for thrombolysis in deep venous thrombosis [J]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgury, 2009, 38(2): 192-198.
[2] Geerts W H, Bergqrist D, Pineo G F, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines [J]. Chest Journal, 2008, 133(6 sup):381S-453S.
[3] Kahn S R. The post thrombotic syndrome [J]. Thrombosis Research, 2011, 127(3 sup): S89-S92.
[4] Froimson M I, Murray T G, Fazekas A F. Venous thromboembolic disease reduction with a portable pneumatic compression device [J]. Journal of Arthroplasty,2009, 24(2): 310-316.
[5] Maclellan D G, Fletcher J P. Mechanical compression in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism [J]. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2007, 77(6): 418-423.
[6] Broderick B J, O’Briain D E, Kearns S R, et al. A hemodynamic study of popliteal vein blood flow:The effect of bed rest and electrically elicited calf muscle contractions [C]//31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Minneapolis. Minnesota,USA: IEEE, 2009.
[7] Broderick B J, O’Briain D E, Breen P P, et al. A pilot evaluation of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) based methodology for the prevention of venous stasis during bed rest [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2010, 32(4): 349-355.
[8] Griffin M, Nicolaides A N, Bond D, et al. The efficacy of a new stimulation technology to increase venous flow and prevent venous stasis [J]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010,40(6): 766-771.
[9] Izumi M, Ikeuchi M, Mitani T, et al. Prevention of venous stasis in the lower limb by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [J]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010, 39(5): 642-645.
[10] Broderick B J, Kennedy C, Breen P P, et al. Patient tolerance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the presence of orthopaedic implants [J].Medical Engineering & Physics, 2011, 33(1): 56-61.
[11] Lyons G M, Leane G E, Grace P A. The effect of electrical stimulation of the calf muscle and compression stocking on venous blood flow velocity [J]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery,2002, 23(6): 564-566.
[12] Corley G J, Breen P P, Brlea S I, et al. Hemodynamic effects of habituation to a week-long program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2012, 34(4): 459-465.
Options
Outlines

/