Improvement of Immunoassay Detection Sensitivity by Using Well-Defined Raspberry-Like Magnetic Microbeads as Carriers

Expand
  • (School of Biomedical Engineering; Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Online published: 2014-11-12

Abstract

Well-defined raspberry-like magnetic microbeads (RMMBs) as immunoassay solid carriers were prepared by chemical covalent binding between Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres and SiO2 nanoparticles. These RMMBs were not as agglomerative as nano-sized magnetie particles (< 200 nm), which was an advangtage for high efficient magnetic separation. When compared to Fe3O4@SiO2 core-shell magnetic microbeads (CMMBs) with smooth surface, RMMBs exhibited stronger capacity to bind biomolecules. Limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) of HBsAg detection using RMMBs as carriers via chemiluminiscence immunoassay (CLIA) were 0.472 and 1.022 μg/L, respectively, showing a notable improvement compared with CMMBs whose LoB and LoD were 1.017 and 1.988 μg/L, respectively. All these indicated a great potential of RMMBs in immunoassay application.

Cite this article

WANG Ye-fei (王叶菲), ZHANG Xin (张欣), XU Ping (徐平), GU Hong-chen (古宏晨), XU Hong* (徐宏) . Improvement of Immunoassay Detection Sensitivity by Using Well-Defined Raspberry-Like Magnetic Microbeads as Carriers[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2014 , 19(5) : 538 -543 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-014-1537-z

References

[1] Colombo M, Carregal-Romero S, Casula M F,et al. Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2012, 41(11): 4306-4334.
[2] Aguilar-Arteaga K, Rodriguez J A, Barrado E.Magnetic solids in analytical chemistry: A review [J].Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 674(2): 157-165.
[3] Reddy L H, Arias J L, Nicolas J, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: Design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112(11):5818-5878.
[4] Lee Y F, Lien K Y, Lei H Y, et al. An integrated microfluidic system for rapid diagnosis of dengue virus infection[J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2009, 25(4):745-752.
[5] Teste B, Vial J, Descroix S, et al. A chemometric approach for optimizing protein covalent immobilization on magnetic core-shell nanoparticles in view of an alternative immunoassay [J]. Talanta, 2010, 81(4-5):1703-1710.
[6] Pankhurst Q A, Connolly J, Jones S K, et al.Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2003, 36(13): R167-R181.
[7] Matsunaga T, Maeda Y, Yoshino T, et al. Fully automated immunoassay for detection of prostatespecific antigen using nano-magnetic beads and micropolystyrene bead composites, ‘beads on beads’ [J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2007, 597(2): 331-339.
[8] Dai X, Xu H, Zhang X, et al. Determination of the affinity constant of streptavidin-coupled magnetic particles and a biotinylated antibody for high performance of magnetic solid carrier in immunoassays [J]. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2014, 34: 422-428.
[9] Kim E Y, Stanton J, Korber B T M, etal. Detection of HIV-1 p24 gag in plasma by a nanoparticle-based bio-barcode-amplification method[J]. Nanomedicine, 2008, 3(3): 293-303.
[10] Borchers K, Weber A, Brunner H, et al. Microstructured layers of spherical biofunctional coreshell nanoparticles provide enlarged reactive surfaces for protein microarrays [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2005, 383(5): 738-746.
[11] Lu W, Qian C, Bi L, et al. Biomolecule-based formaldehyde resin microspheres loaded with Au nanoparticles: A novel immunoassay for detection of tumor markers in human serum [J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2014, 53: 346-354.
[12] Zhang B, Tang D, Liu B, et al. Nanogoldfunctionalized magnetic beads with redox activity for sensitive electrochemical immunoassay of thyroidstimulating hormone [J]. Analytica Chimica Acta,2012, 711: 17-23.
[13] Zhao B, Collinson M M. Well-defined hierarchical templates for multimodal porous material fabrication[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2010, 22(14): 4312-4319.
[14] Xu H, Cui L, Tong N, et al. Development of high magnetization Fe3O4/polystyrene/silica nanospheres via combined miniemulsion/emulsion polymerization[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2006,128(49): 15582-15583.
[15] Xu Y, Xu H, Gu H. Controllable preparation of epoxy-functionalized magnetic polymer latexes with different morphologies by modified miniemulsion polymerization[J]. Journal of Polymer Science Part A:Polymer Chemistry, 2010, 48: 2284-2293.
[16] St¨oer W, Fink A, Bohn E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range [J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1968, 26(1):62-69.
[17] Qu Z, Xu H, Ning P, et al. A facile, one-step method for the determination of accessible surface primary amino groups on solid carriers [J]. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2012, 44(10): 1309-1313.
[18] Wu Q, Wang Z, Kong X, et al. A facile strategy for controlling the self-assembly of nanocomposite particles based on colloidal steric stabilization theory [J].Langmuir, 2008, 24(15): 7778-7784.
[19] Vertegel A A, Siegel R W, Dordick J S. Silica nanoparticle size influences the structure and enzymatic activity of adsorbed lysozyme [J]. Langmuir,2004, 20(16): 6800-6807.
[20] Seehuber A, Dahint R. Conformation and activity of glucose oxidase on homogeneously coated and nanostructured surfaces [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(23): 6980-6989.
Options
Outlines

/