Motion responses of the floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) hull and the mooring loads in a 100-
year return environmental condition are predicted with the help of the well known coupled dynamic analysis code
DeepC. A ship-shaped turret-moored FLNG moored by 4×3 chain-polyester-chain lines in 1.5 km depth of water
is studied. Two types of turrets such as internal and external turrets, resulting from different locations of the
turrets, are adopted respectively in the numerical simulations. Motion responses of the FLNG hull and forces of
the mooring lines obtained from the internal turret case and external turret case are compared with each other.
Significant differences are obtained. Statistic analysis is also used to analyze the comparison results, and effects
of the turret location on the FLNG hydrodynamic characteristics are summed up. The conclusion regarding the
hydrodynamic differences between internal and external turret-moored FLNG systems would provide help for
design of the FLNG system.
ZHAO Wen-hua (赵文华), YANG Jian-min* (杨建民), HU Zhi-qiang (胡志强), WEI Yue-feng (魏跃峰)
. Numerical Investigation on the Hydrodynamic Difference Between Internal and External Turret-Moored FLNG[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2013
, 18(5)
: 590
-597
.
DOI: 10.1007/s12204-011-1202-8
[1] Kim J W, Jim O S, Atle S, et al. Global performance and sloshing analysis of a new deep-draft semisubmersible LNG FPSO [C]// Proc 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.Estoril, Portugal: ASME, 2008: 881-889.
[2] Mravak Z, Lauzon J D, Chung Y S, et al. Strength assessment of membrane LNG tank structure based on direct calculation of structural response [C]// Proc 28th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Hawaii, USA: ASME, 2009: 767-774.
[3] Graczyk M, Moan T. Structural response to sloshing excitation in membrane LNG tank [J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2011, 133(2): 103-111.
[4] White J, Longley H. FLNG technology shows promise for stranded gas fields [J]. Offshore, 2009, 69(11): 78-79.
[5] Wichers J EW. A simulation model for a single point moored tanker [D]. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 1988.
[6] Sphaier S H, Fernandes A C, Correa S H. Maneuvering model for the FPSO horizontal plane behavior [C]// Proc 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Seattle, USA: ISOPE, 2000:334-337.
[7] Lee D H, Choi H S. A dynamic analysis of FPSOshuttle tanker system [C]// Proc 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Seattle, USA: ISOPE, 2000: 302-307.
[8] Munipalli J, Pistani F, Thiagarajan K P, et al. Weathervaning instabilities of a FPSO in regular waves and consequence on response amplitude operators [C]// Proc 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego, USA: ASME, 2007: 405-412.
[9] Lee S J. The effects of LNG-sloshing on the global responses of LNG-carriers [D]. Texas, USA: Texax A&M University, 2008.
[10] Salvesen N, Tuck E O, Faltinsen O M. Ship motions and sea loads [J]. Transcations of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1970, 78, 250-287.
[11] Luo Y, Baudic S. Predicting FPSO response using model test and numerical analysis [C]// Proc 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Hawaii, USA: ISOPE, 2003: 167-174.
[12] Moriskita H M, Junior J R D S. Dynamic behavior of a DICAS FPSO and shuttle vessel under the action of wind, current and waves [C]// Proc 12nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Kitakyushu, Japan: ISOPE, 2002: 142-150.
[13] Garrett D L. Dynamic analysis of slender rods [J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1982, 104(4), 302-307.
[14] Riarald O, Elizabeth P. Riflex theory manual [R]. Tronheim, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2005.
[15] Kannah T R, Natarajan R. Effect of turret location on the dynamic behaviour of an internal turret moored FPSO system [J]. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 2006, 3(1): 23-37.
