Articles

Evaluation on Contribution of Steel Products to Environmental Improvement from Life Cycle Assessment Perspectives

Expand
  • (1. College of Urban Construction and Safety Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China; 2. Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201900, China)

Online published: 2012-11-15

Abstract

High functionality given to steel products results in incremental environment loads at the steelmaking stage. However, at the stage of utilization, high-functional steel products prove more environment friendly than their conventional counterparts in many cases. Therefore, evaluation on contribution of steel products to environmental improvement requires an integrated approach that considers the product over its entire life cycle — life cycle assessment (LCA). This paper discusses the relationship between the improvement of steel products performance and environmental impact from the entire life cycle perspectives. The LCA method to calculate and assess contribution of high-functional steel products during the life cycle to environmental improvement is explained. Two case studies of Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel for short) are given to show that LCA is a scientific and systematic method for eco-materials evaluation or eco-design: 1)in a power transformer, using silicon steel B30P110 to replace B30G130 can reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the region of 15.1% over the life cycle of the power transformer; 2)tinplate steel of Baosteel for two-piece steel cans experienced six times thickness reduction from 0.280 to 0.225mm, which results in 14.5% emission reduction over the life cycle of two-piece steel cans. It is a systematic and scientific method for evaluating on products environmental performance from life cycle perspective.

Cite this article

WANG Wei-han1 (王伟晗), LIU Tao2 (刘涛), LIU Ying-hao2 (刘颖昊), GUO Shui-hua2 (郭水华) . Evaluation on Contribution of Steel Products to Environmental Improvement from Life Cycle Assessment Perspectives[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2012 , 17(3) : 370 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-012-1289-6

References

[1] ISO14040. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework [S]. 2006.
[2] ISO14044. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines [S]. 2006.
[3] World Steel Association. Life cycle assessment methodology report [R]. Brussels: World Steel Association,2011.
[4] Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, et al. Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory.
Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plant [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2000, 8(2): 95-108.
[5] Liu Ying-hao, Huang Zhi-jia, Sha Gao-yuan, et al. Study on life cycle inventory of electro-galvanized steel
sheet [J]. China Metallurgy, 2007, 17(2): 21-22, 37 (in Chinese).
[6] Weidema B P, Wesn?s M S. Data quality management for life cycle inventories—An example of using
data quality indicators [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1996, 3(3-4): 167-174.
[7] Liu Tao, Huang Zhi-jia. Selection for key data in uncertainty analysis of life cycle inventory [J]. Journal of
Anhui University of Technology, 2006, 23(1): 91-95 (in Chinese).
[8] Li Bao-guo. Approach to oriented silicon steel. I. Strategic material of national power industry [N].Baosteel Daily, 2009-1-9 (in Chinese).
Options
Outlines

/