Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information

doi:10.1007/s12204-015-1641-8

上海交通大学学报（英文版） ›› 2015, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 380-384.doi: 10.1007/s12204-015-1641-8

• • 上一篇

Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information

ZHAO Chun-yu1* (赵春宇), LIU Jing-jiang1 (刘景江), MA Lun2 (马伦), ZHANG Wei-jun3 (张伟君)

(1. Baicheng Ordnance Test Center of China, Baicheng 137001, Jilin, China; 2. Academy of Equipment, Beijing 101416, China; 3. Divisions 73, Unit 66362, Beijing 101200, China)

发布日期:2015-06-11
通讯作者: ZHAO Chun-yu (赵春宇) E-mail:malun018@163.com

Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information

ZHAO Chun-yu1* (赵春宇), LIU Jing-jiang1 (刘景江), MA Lun2 (马伦), ZHANG Wei-jun3 (张伟君)

(1. Baicheng Ordnance Test Center of China, Baicheng 137001, Jilin, China; 2. Academy of Equipment, Beijing 101416, China; 3. Divisions 73, Unit 66362, Beijing 101200, China)

Published:2015-06-11
Contact: ZHAO Chun-yu (赵春宇) E-mail:malun018@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： As a prerequisite for effective prognostics, the goodness of the features affects the complexity of the prognostic methods. Comparing to features quality evaluation in diagnostics, features evaluation for prognostics is a new problem. Normally, the monotonic tendency of feature series can be used as the visual representation of equipment damage cumulation so that forecasting its future health states is easy to implement. Through introducing the concept of ranking mutual information in ordinal case, a monotonicity evaluation method of monitoring feature series is proposed. Finally, this method is verified by the simulating feature series and the results verify its effectivity. For the specific application in industry, the evaluation results can be used as the standard for selecting prognostic feature.

关键词: monotonicity evaluation, monitoring feature, ranking mutual information, prognostics

Abstract: As a prerequisite for effective prognostics, the goodness of the features affects the complexity of the prognostic methods. Comparing to features quality evaluation in diagnostics, features evaluation for prognostics is a new problem. Normally, the monotonic tendency of feature series can be used as the visual representation of equipment damage cumulation so that forecasting its future health states is easy to implement. Through introducing the concept of ranking mutual information in ordinal case, a monotonicity evaluation method of monitoring feature series is proposed. Finally, this method is verified by the simulating feature series and the results verify its effectivity. For the specific application in industry, the evaluation results can be used as the standard for selecting prognostic feature.

Key words: monotonicity evaluation, monitoring feature, ranking mutual information, prognostics

中图分类号:

TP 206

ZHAO Chun-yu1* (赵春宇), LIU Jing-jiang1 (刘景江), MA Lun2 (马伦), ZHANG Wei-jun3 (张伟君). Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information[J]. 上海交通大学学报（英文版）, 2015, 20(3): 380-384.

ZHAO Chun-yu1* (赵春宇), LIU Jing-jiang1 (刘景江), MA Lun2 (马伦), ZHANG Wei-jun3 (张伟君). Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2015, 20(3): 380-384.

参考文献 8

[1]	Mahamad A K, Saon S, Hiyama T. Predicting remaining useful life of rotating machinery based artificial neural network [J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2010, 60(4): 1078-1087.
[2]	Heng A, Zhang S, Tan A C C, et al. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2009, 23(3): 724-739.
[3]	Tran V T, Yang B S. An intelligent condition-based maintenance platform for rotating machinery [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 2977-2988.
[4]	Camci F, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. Feature evaluation for effective bearing prognostics [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2013, 29(4):477-486.
[5]	Medjaher K, Camci F, Zerhouni N. Feature extraction and evaluation for health assessment and failure prognostics [C]// Proceedings of First European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.Dresden, Germany: Anibal Bregon, 2012: 111-116.
[6]	Peng H, Long F, Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information: Criteria of max-dependency,max-relevance, and min-redundancy [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2005, 27(8): 1226-1238.
[7]	Hu Q H, Guo M Z, Yu D R, et al. Information entropy for ordinal classification [J]. Science China: Information Sciences, 2010, 53(6): 1188-1200.
[8]	Zhao X M, Zuo M J, Patel T. EMD, ranking mutual information and PCA based condition monitoring[C]// Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Montreal,Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, 2010: 1-6.

Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information

Monotonicity Evaluation Method of Monitoring Feature Series Based on Ranking Mutual Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 8

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价