To study the hydrodynamic characteristics of surface piercing propeller under natural ventilation condition, the numerical simulation on the unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow field of the standard model 841B was performed by solving RANS equation and combining it with the VOF method and using sliding mesh technique. The results show that the calculated values of thrust coefficient KT and torque coefficient 10KQ are in good agreement with the experimental data; especially near the design point, the errors of both are within 5%. The air cavity develops downstream in spirals in the wake field; the diameter of the spiral first increases and then decreases; finally, the spiral cavity gradually disappears. The forces/moments acting on the surface piercing propeller under small immersion condition are very large in horizontal and vertical directions. The wake flow field of surface piercing propeller is bounded by the free surface. The velocity in the wake field mutates in the free surface. In front of the disk, surface piercing propeller affects the flow field by suction effect; whereas the slipstream effect dominates the flow field behind the disk.
REN Zhen,WANG Chao,WAN Decheng,YUAN Yuming
. Numerical Analysis of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of
Surface Piercing Propeller Under Naturally Ventilated Condition[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018
, 52(6)
: 636
-642
.
DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.06.002
［1］丁恩宝, 唐登海, 周伟新. 半浸式螺旋桨研究综述［J］. 船舶力学, 2002, 6(2): 75-84.
DING Enbao, TANG Denghai, ZHOU Weixing. Research review on the semi-submerged propellers［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2002, 6(2): 75-84.
［2］MISRA S C, GOKARN R P, SHA O P, et al. Development of a four-bladed surface piercing propeller series［J］. Naval Engineers Journal, 2012, 124: 111-141.
［3］PANARELLO A, SCAMARDELLA A, VIVIANDO M, et al. Model tests and full scale operation with surface piercing propellers ［J］. Journal of Marine Design and Operations, 2003 (B3): 21-31.
［4］FURUYA O. A performance-prediction theory for partially submerged ventilated propellers［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1985, 151: 311-335.
［5］YOUNG Y L, KINNAS S A. Performance prediction of surface piercing propeller［J］. Journal of Ship Research, 2004, 48(4): 288-304.
［6］YOUNG Y L. Numerical modeling of supercavitating and surface piercing propellers［D］. Austin: University of Texas, 2002.
［7］YOUNG Y L, SAVANDER B R. Numerical analysis of large-scale surface piercing propellers［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(13): 1368-1381.
［8］YARI E, GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic analysis of the surface-piercing propeller in unsteady open water condition using boundary element method［J］. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2016, 8(1): 22-37.
［9］GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the surface-piercing propellers for the planing craft［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2009, 8(4): 267-274.
［10］SHADEMANI R, GHASSEMI H. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the surface piercing propeller for the paining craft［C］∥Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Hawaii: ASME, 2009: 1-7.
［11］ALIMIRZAZADEH S, ROSHAN S Z, SEIF M S. Unsteady RANS simulation of a surface piercing propeller in oblique flow ［J］. Applied Ocean Research, 2016, 56: 79-91.
［12］YARI E, GHASSEMI H. Numerical analysis of surface piercing propeller in unsteady condition and cupped effect on ventilation pattern of blade cross section［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2016, 21(3): 1-16.
［13］施宇翔. 半浸式螺旋桨水动力性能的数值模拟研究［D］.杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
SHI Yuxiang. Numerical study of the hydrodynamic performance of surface piercing propeller［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014.
［14］OLOFSSON N. Force and flow characteristics of a partially submerged propeller［D］. Goteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University, 1993.
