船舶海洋与建筑工程

聚合物基体类型对海水海砂混凝土环境下GFRP筋层间剪切强度影响

  • 赵烜 ,
  • 赵齐 ,
  • 张大旭 ,
  • 张沛涪
展开
  • 1 上海交通大学 船舶海洋与建筑工程学院, 上海 200240
    2 上海交通大学 海洋工程国家重点实验室, 上海 200240
    3 上海交通大学 上海市公共建筑和基础设施数字化运维重点实验室, 上海 200240
    4 香港理工大学 土木及环境工程学系, 香港 999077
赵 烜(1999—),硕士生,从事复合材料力学与纤维增强聚合物的损伤研究.
张大旭,教授,博士生导师;E-mail:daxu.zhang@sjtu.edu.cn.

收稿日期: 2024-03-22

  修回日期: 2024-05-13

  录用日期: 2024-05-29

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-30

Effects of Polymer Matrices on Interlaminar Shear Strength of GFRP Rebars in Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete Environment

  • ZHAO Xuan ,
  • ZHAO Qi ,
  • ZHANG Daxu ,
  • ZHANG Peifu
Expand
  • 1 School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    3 Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received date: 2024-03-22

  Revised date: 2024-05-13

  Accepted date: 2024-05-29

  Online published: 2026-03-30

摘要

为研究不同基体类型的玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)筋在海水海砂混凝土(SWSSC)环境下的层间剪切强度(ILSS)退化规律与性能劣化机理,对环氧基和乙烯基GFRP筋进行了SWSSC模拟孔溶液环境下加速腐蚀试验,以及层间剪切与扫描电镜(SEM)检测,其中环氧基GFRP筋分别采用甲基六氢化邻苯二甲酸酐(MHHPA)与二氨基二苯甲烷(MDA)两种固化剂固化.结果表明: MHHPA固化环氧基GFRP筋的初始层间剪切强度最高(42.44 MPa),乙烯基GFRP筋次之(37.10 MPa),MDA固化环氧基GFRP筋的初始层间剪切强度最低(27.20 MPa).在55 ℃的孔溶液中浸泡84 d后,MHHPA固化环氧基GFRP筋的层间剪切强度保留率仅为7.43%,MDA固化环氧基GFRP筋的强度保留率为39.51%,而乙烯基GFRP筋的保留率则有71.06%.3种GFRP筋的层间剪切强度均随SWSSC模拟孔溶液温度和浸泡时间的增加呈下降趋势,强度退化的主要原因为纤维-基体的界面脱黏以及基体的水解流失.乙烯基GFRP筋对SWSSC模拟孔溶液的抗腐蚀能力最强,MHHPA固化环氧基GFRP筋的最弱,MDA固化环氧基GFRP筋则介于两者之间.

本文引用格式

赵烜 , 赵齐 , 张大旭 , 张沛涪 . 聚合物基体类型对海水海砂混凝土环境下GFRP筋层间剪切强度影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2026 , 60(3) : 452 -462 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2024.100

Abstract

To investigate the degradation laws and deterioration mechanisms of interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars with different matrices in seawater and sea-sand concrete (SWSSC) environment, an accelerated corrosion test was conducted on epoxy-based and vinyl ester-based GFRP rebar specimens in a simulated SWSSC pore solution, and then the ILSS tests and scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests were conducted. For epoxy-based GFRP rebars, two kinds of curing agents naming MHHPA and MDA were adopted. The results indicate that the uncorroded MHHPA cured epoxy-based GFRP rebars possesse the highest initial ILSS (42.44 MPa), followed by the vinyl ester-based GFRP rebars (37.10 MPa), while the MDA cured epoxy-based GFRP rebars have the lowest initial ILSS (27.20 MPa). After immersion in a 55 ℃ pore solution environment for 84 d, the ILSS retention of MHHPA cured epoxy-based GFRP rebars is 7.43% while the ILSS retention of MDA cured epoxy-based GFRP and vinyl ester-based GFRP rebars are 39.51% and 71.06% respectively. With the increase in temperature and immersion time in the SWSSC simulated pore solution, the ILSS of three kinds of GFRP rebars all show a declining trend. The reasons for the degradation of ILSS are the interfacial debonding between fibers and matrix and the hydrolytic loss of the matrix. Among the tested specimens, the vinyl ester-based GFRP rebars exhibit the strongest resistance to corrosion in the simulated SWSSC pore solution, while the MHHPA cured epoxy-based GFRP rebars show the weakest resistance with the MDA cured epoxy-based GFRP rebars being intermediate.

参考文献

[1] OBANDO M, IQBAL M, ZHANG D X, et al. Axial strength prediction of seawater sea sand concrete-filled circular FRP tubes under alkaline environment based on ensemble learning models[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 195: 111530.
[2] LIU J, AN R, JIANG Z L, et al. Effects of w/b ratio, fly ash, limestone calcined clay, seawater and sea-sand on workability, mechanical properties, drying shrinkage behavior and micro-structural characteristics of concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 321: 126333.
[3] ZHANG P F, IQBAL M, ZHANG D X, et al. Bond strength prediction of FRP bars to seawater sea sand concrete based on ensemble learning models[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 302: 117382.
[4] 冯鹏, 王杰, 张枭, 等. FRP与海砂混凝土组合应用的发展与创新[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2014(12): 13-18.
  FENG Peng, WANG Jie, ZHANG Xiao, et al. Development and innovation on combining FRP and sea sand concrete for structures[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2014(12): 13-18.
[5] GUO F, AL-SAADI S, SINGH RAMAN R K, et al. Durability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) in simulated seawater sea sand concrete (SWSSC) environment[J]. Corrosion Science, 2018, 141: 1-13.
[6] 肖建庄, 张鹏, 张青天, 等. 海水海砂再生混凝土的基本力学性能[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2018, 35(2): 16-22.
  XIAO Jianzhuang, ZHANG Peng, ZHANG Qingtian, et al. Basic mechanical properties of seawater sea-sand recycled concrete[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2018, 35(2): 16-22.
[7] BAZLI M, ZHAO X L, JAFARI A, et al. Mechanical properties of pultruded GFRP profiles under seawater sea sand concrete environment coupled with UV radiation and moisture[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 258: 120369.
[8] WANG D H, GONG Q N, YUAN Q, et al. Review of the properties of fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced seawater-sea sand concrete[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33(10): 04021285.
[9] WU W W, HE X J, YANG W R, et al. Durability and microstructure degradation mechanism of FRP-seawater seasand concrete structures: A review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 391: 131825.
[10] ZHAO Q, ZHANG D X, ZHAO X L, et al. Modelling damage evolution of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy polymer composites in seawater sea sand concrete environment[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2021, 215: 108961.
[11] 王文华, 赵齐, 张大旭, 等. 相对湿度对海水海砂混凝土环境下GFRP筋拉伸性能影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 148-160.
  WANG Wenhua, ZHAO Qi, ZHANG Daxu, et al. Effects of relative humidity on tensile property degradation of GFRP rebars in seawater and sea sand concrete envirnment[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(2): 148-160.
[12] LI Y L, ZHAO X L, SINGH RAMAN R K, et al. Tests on seawater and sea sand concrete-filled CFRP, BFRP and stainless steel tubular stub columns[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 108: 163-184.
[13] 滕锦光. 新材料组合结构[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(12): 1-11.
  TENG Jinguang. New-material hybrid structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(12): 1-11.
[14] WU G, DONG Z Q, WANG X, et al. Prediction of long-term performance and durability of BFRP bars under the combined effect of sustained load and corrosive solutions[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 19(3): 04014058.
[15] 董志强, 吴刚. FRP筋增强混凝土结构耐久性能研究进展[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(10): 1-19.
  DONG Zhiqiang, WU Gang. Research progress on durability of FRP bars reinforced concrete structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(10): 1-19.
[16] AHMED A, GUO S C, ZHANG Z H, et al. A review on durability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars reinforced seawater sea sand concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 256: 119484.
[17] WEN S Y, CAO M L. Review on degradation behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer bars in marine environments[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2023, 58(24): 9861-9893.
[18] WANG Z K, ZHAO X L, XIAN G J, et al. Durability study on interlaminar shear behaviour of basalt-, glass-and carbon-fibre reinforced polymer (B/G/CFRP) bars in seawater sea sand concrete environment[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156: 985-1004.
[19] YI Y, GUO S C, LI S, et al. Effect of alkalinity on the shear performance degradation of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in simulated seawater sea sand concrete environment[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 299: 123957.
[20] BENMOKRANE B, ALI A H, MOHAMED H M, et al. Laboratory assessment and durability performance of vinyl-ester, polyester, and epoxy glass-FRP bars for concrete structures[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 114: 163-174.
[21] SUN Y N, JIN Z Q, ZHANG X Y, et al. Degradation of GFRP bars in alkaline environments: An experimental and molecular dynamics study[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 77: 107449.
[22] ALI A H, MOHAMED H M, BENMOKRANE B, et al. Durability performance and long-term prediction models of sand-coated basalt FRP bars[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 157: 248-258.
[23] 王自柯, 段建新, 赵军, 等. FRP筋在不同腐蚀环境下的层间剪切性能劣化试验[J]. 复合材料学报, 2024, 41(4): 2031-2042.
  WANG Zike, DUAN Jianxin, ZHAO Jun, et al. Experimental study on the degradation of interlaminar shear performance of FRP bars in different corrosive environments[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41(4): 2031-2042.
[24] BARNEYBACK R S, DIAMOND S. Expression and analysis of pore fluids from hardened cement pastes and mortars[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1981, 11(2): 279-285.
[25] 赵齐, 张大旭, 赵晓林, 等. 环氧基GFRP筋在海水海砂混凝土孔溶液环境下的损伤演化试验与模型研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(9): 25-41.
  ZHAO Qi, ZHANG Daxu, ZHAO Xiaolin, et al. Experimental and modelling studies on damage evolution of epoxy-based GFRP bars in pore solution environment of seawater sea-sand concrete[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(9): 25-41.
[26] SHI C, STEGEMANN J A, CALDWELL R J. Effect of supplementary cementing materials on the specific conductivity of pore solution and its implications on the rapid chloride permeability test (AASHTO T277 and ASTM C1202) results[J]. Aci Materials Journal, 1998, 95(4): 389-394.
[27] CHEN Y, DAVALOS J F, RAY I. Durability prediction for GFRP reinforcing bars using short-term data of accelerated aging tests[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2006, 10(4): 279-286.
[28] ASTM. Standard test method for apparent horizontal shear strength of pultruded reinforced plastic rods by the short-beam method:ASTM D4475-21[S]. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: American Society of Testing Materials, 2021.
[29] ZHAO Q, ZHAO X L, ZHANG D X, et al. Degradation of GFRP bars with epoxy and vinyl ester matrices in a marine concrete environment: An experimental study and theoretical modeling[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2024, 28(2): 04024004.
文章导航

/