船舶海洋与建筑工程

基于模型预测控制的深海钻井立管再入井仿真分析

  • 张晨宇 ,
  • 孟帅
展开
  • 上海交通大学 海洋工程国家重点实验室, 上海 200240
张晨宇(1998-),硕士生,从事海洋立管再入井控制研究.

收稿日期: 2022-06-21

  修回日期: 2022-10-06

  录用日期: 2022-10-18

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-09

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(51879161);国家自然科学基金项目(51509153)

Simulation Study of Reentry Dynamics of a Deep-Water Drilling Riser System Based on Model Predictive Control

  • Chenyu ZHANG ,
  • Shuai MENG
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 2022-06-21

  Revised date: 2022-10-06

  Accepted date: 2022-10-18

  Online published: 2022-12-09

摘要

海洋立管在钻井作业时一旦遇到恶劣天气须将底端总成和防喷器断开,待天气好转需重新连接称为再入井作业.深海区钻井立管发生断开的概率大幅增加,为适应多变的海况需要快速完成再入井过程.提出基于模型预测控制(MPC)再入井控制系统;基于哈密顿原理建立悬挂立管分析模型,设计优化函数及约束项,构建非线性扰动观测器实现洋流力模型误差和洋流速度扰动补偿,与传统比例-积分-微分(PID)控制作业进行仿真比较.MPC系统作用下,母船迅速响应,立管能快速稳定完成再入井作业,较好处理洋流力模型误差,并在洋流速度扰动下具有良好鲁棒性.立管由于长径比大幅增加导致柔性显著增强,在母船及海洋环境力激励下,悬挂立管在快速再入井过程中高阶模态可能被激发.

本文引用格式

张晨宇 , 孟帅 . 基于模型预测控制的深海钻井立管再入井仿真分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023 , 57(11) : 1389 -1399 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.235

Abstract

A marine drilling riser at normal operation condition is required to disconnect the lower marine riser package (LMRP) and blow-out preventer (BOP) in case of severe weather. When the weather gets fine, it must reconnect the LMRP and the BOP. This process is called riser reentry. Marine drilling operations have been driven into extreme deep-waters characterized by severe weather which inevitably leads to a much higher incidence of disconnection. In addition, it requires to accomplish the reentry in a fast way owing to the capricious ocean environment. This study tries to develop a novel reentry control system based on model predictive control (MPC). First, the transverse governing equation of the hanging-off riser system with an end-mass is established based on the modified Hamilton’s principle. The optimization function and constraints in MPC are designed by use of the riser prediction model and the target location. A nonlinear disturbance observer is established for compensation of the model uncertainties and ocean environment disturbances. Finally, simulations are conducted after introducing the dynamic position system (DPS). The riser dynamics employing MPC are compared with that when adopting proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. It has found that the drilling riser system based on MPC has a higher response speed, which can complete the reentry process in a faster and more stable manner. It can handle the hydrodynamic force model uncertainties well and has a good robustness for current velocity disturbances. As the flexibility of the riser system is notably enhanced with the significant increase of aspect ratio, the higher-order mode of the flexible hanging-off riser can be triggered in the fast reentry process subjected to the excitations of the mother vessel and ocean environment.

参考文献

[1] MURAI M, YAMAMOTO M. An experimental analysis of the internal flow effect on marine risers[C]// Proceedings of the Internal Conference on Marine Technology. Dhaka, Bangladesh: MARTEC, 2010: 159-165.
[2] 王宗义, 肖坤, 庞永杰, 等. 船舶动力定位的数学模型和滤波方法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2002, (4): 24-28.
[2] WANG Zongyi, XIAO Kun, PANG Yongjie, et al. Mathematical models and filtering methods for dynamic ship positioning[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2002(4): 24-28.
[3] SUZUKI H, YOSHIDA K, SHIDA S, et al. Active control of riser deformation and vessel motion for automatic entry/reentry system[C]// Proceedings of 4th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Osaka, Japan: ISOPE, 1994: 216-223.
[4] SUZUKI H, TAO Q, WATANABE K. Learning tracking controllers under unknown disturbances for the installation of rigid and flexible structures[J]. Journal of Marine Science & Technology, 1999, 4(4): 187-199.
[5] TAKAYUKI I, KAZUHISA O, KAJIWARA H, et al. On vibration control of flexible pipe in ocean drilling system[C]// Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. San Francisco, USA: ISOPE, 2006: 26-30.
[6] KOTERAYAMA W, NAKAMURA M, KAJIWARA H, et al. Development of a training simulator for dynamic reentry operations of a riser pipe hanged off[C]// Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Vancouver, Canada: ISOPE, 2008: 67-70.
[7] KOTERAYAMA W, KARJIWARA H, NAKAMURA M, et al. Model experiments of reentry control based on riser pipe dynamics[C]// The Eighth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium. Bangkok, Thailand: ISOPE, 2008: 8-12.
[8] KARJIWARA H, NORIDOMI K. Reentry control system design for a riser pipe experimental model under steady current[C]2009 ICCAS-SICE. Fukuoka, Japan: IEEE, 2009: 3896-3901.
[9] HU Y L, YAO B H, ZHENG Z, et al. Research on marine riser in different installations stages of subsea production tree[C]// Shanghai, China. China: IEEE, 2016: 920-922.
[10] WANG S W, XU X S, YAO B H, et al. A finite difference approximation for dynamic calculation of vertical free hanging slender riser in re-entry application[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2012, 26(4): 637-652.
[11] 王盛炜, 徐雪松, 姚宝恒, 等. 针对立管重入井过程中等路径段加速度的改进型蚁群优化算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2013, 47(10): 1585-1590.
[11] WANG Shengwei, XU Xuesong, YAO Baoheng, et al. Improved ant colony optimization for accelerations of equal-length paths of riser re-entry[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013, 47(10): 1585-1590.
[12] WANG S W, XU X S, LU X. Movement optimization of freely-hanging deepwater risers in reentry[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 116: 32-41.
[13] TRIANTAFYLLOU M S. Cable mechanics for moored floating systems[C]// Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Behavior of Offshore Structures. Massachusetts, USA: Pergamon, 1994: 57-79.
[14] CHATJIGEORGIOU I K. A finite differences formulation for the linear and nonlinear dynamics of 2D catenary risers[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35(7): 616-636.
[15] HU Y L, CAO J J, YAO B H, et al. Dynamic behaviors of a marine riser with variable length during the installation of a subsea production tree[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2017, 23(3): 1-11.
[16] 胡永利. 深海钻井立管重入井作业运动特性及其优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2018.
[16] HU Yongli, Study of properties and optimization of deep-sea drilling riser in reentry[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018.
[17] HU Y L, YAO B H, LIAN L. Analysis of drilling riser in re-entry operation under complex currents[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2019, 23(12): 1528-1540.
[18] YAMAMOTO M, MOROOKA C K, UENO S. Dynamic behavior of a semi-submersible platform coupled with drilling riser during re-entry operation in ultra-deep water[C]// Proceedings of the ASME 2007 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego, California, USA: ASME, 2007: 239-248.
[19] YAMAMOTO M. An automatic approaching control for the petroleum well re-entry operation in ultra-deep water[C]// Proceedings of the 8th IFAC International Conference on Maneuvering and Control of Marine Craft. Guarujá, Brazil: IFAC, 2009: 388-393,
[20] YAMAMOTO M, MOROOKA C K. Feedback control system for blow-out preventer positioning[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 82: 362-369.
[21] 毛良杰, 付燈煌, 曾松. 正常连接与悬挂撤离工况下深水钻井隔水管动力特性与安全分析[J]. 船舶力学, 2022, 26(2): 250-263.
[21] MAO Liangjie, FU Denghuang, ZENG Song. Dynamic characteristics and safety analysis of deep water drilling riser under normal connected condition and hang-off evacuation condition[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2022, 26(2): 250-263.
[22] FOSSEN T I. Guidance and control of ocean vehicles[M]. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
[23] S?RENSEN A J, SAGATUN S I, FOSSEN T I. Design of a dynamic positioning system using model-based control[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 1996, 4(3): 359-368.
文章导航

/