上海地区多含水层系统深部承压层降水诱发地层响应规律
收稿日期: 2021-09-28
修回日期: 2021-12-01
录用日期: 2021-12-08
网络出版日期: 2022-11-24
基金资助
国家自然科学基金面上项目(41977216);上海市青年科技启明星计划(19QB1401800)
Strata Responses Due to Pumping from Deep Confined Aquifers of Multi-Aquifer-Aquitard System in Shanghai
Received date: 2021-09-28
Revised date: 2021-12-01
Accepted date: 2021-12-08
Online published: 2022-11-24
软土地区多含水层系统承压层抽水存在越流现象,地下水渗流和区域地层变形响应规律复杂.基于某超深地下工程承压水抽水试验,采用数值方法研究软土地区多含水层系统第二、第三承压层降水的地质环境响应.建立了三维有限差分模型,考虑流固耦合效应和土体小应变刚度特性,模拟了不同埋深承压含水层抽水试验,对比分析各承压层抽水引起的承压水头降深和深层土体变形时空分布特性.结果表明,第二承压层水位降深较小,但引起的地表沉降更大;第二和第三承压层抽水引起降水层的压缩变形分别占地表沉降的56.18%和77.69%.主要原因为浅部土层压缩性高,相同降深条件下引起的土层竖向压缩量更大;且第二承压层与上部弱透水层的水力联系较强,越流作用明显,导致抽水引起的地下水水位降深在深度方向的影响范围更大.研究成果对后续超深基坑降水施工及环境变形控制具有重要的参考价值.
彭晨鑫, 李明广, 甄亮, 李耀良, 张哲彬 . 上海地区多含水层系统深部承压层降水诱发地层响应规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023 , 57(2) : 138 -147 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.386
When pumping in confined aquifers, vertical leakage could be found in the multi-aquifer system in soft deposits, and the responses of groundwater flow and strata deformation are complicated. Based on pumping tests in an ultra-deep underground project, this study performs a 3D finite-difference modeling to investigate the responses of groundwater and strata to pumping in the second and third confined aquifers. It considers the hydro-mechanical coupled and small strain stiffness characteristics of soils in the analysis, and discusses and compares the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of drawdown and deformation induced by pumping in different confined aquifers. The results indicate that the ground settlement induced by pumping in the second confined aquifer is greater though the groundwater drawdown is smaller, and the compression of dewatering aquifers caused by dewatering in the second and third aquifers accounts for 56.18% and 77.69% of the settlement, respectively. It could be attributed to the connectivity between the second confined aquifer and its overlying aquitards, which results in a greater influential depth. In addition, the compressibility of shallow strata is significantly greater than that of deep strata. The study is significant for the dewatering construction and environmental deformation control of ultra-deep excavations.
[1] | 史玉金, 严学新, 陈大平. 上海海陆一体工程地质结构构建及地质条件评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 44(2): 96-101. |
[1] | SHI Yujin, YAN Xuexin, CHEN Daping. Engineering geological structure establishment and conditions assessment integrating land and sea in Shanghai coastal area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(2): 96-101. |
[2] | 郑启宇, 夏小和, 李明广, 等. 深基坑降承压水对墙体变形和地表沉降的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(10): 1094-1100. |
[2] | ZHENG Qiyu, XIA Xiaohe, LI Mingguang, et al. Influence of dewatering in confined aquifers on wall deformation and ground settlements in deep excavation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020, 54(10): 1094-1100. |
[3] | 仵彦卿, 张建山, 李哲. 基坑抽水引起周围地面沉降机理及防治措施[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(10): 61-65. |
[3] | WU Yanqing, ZHANG Jianshan, LI Zhe. Mechanism analysis of land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal and control measures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(10): 61-65. |
[4] | ZENG C F, WANG S, XUE X L, et al. Evolution of deep ground settlement subject to groundwater drawdown during dewatering in a multi-layered aquifer-aquitard system: Insights from numerical modelling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603: 127078. |
[5] | ZENG C F, ZHENG G, XUE X L. Responses of deep soil layers to combined recharge in a leaky aquifer[J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 260: 105263. |
[6] | WU Y X, ZHENG Q, ZHOU A N, et al. Numerical evaluation of the ground response induced by dewatering in a multi-aquifer system[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(5): 101209. |
[7] | WANG D F, LI M G, CHEN J J, et al. Numerical study on groundwater drawdown and deformation responses of multi-layer strata to pumping in a confined aquifer[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2019, 24(3): 287-293. |
[8] | ZENG C F, SONG W W, XUE X L, et al. Construction dewatering in a metro station incorporating buttress retaining wall to limit ground settlement: Insights from experimental modelling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 116: 104124. |
[9] | CHAI J C, SHEN S L, ZHU H H, et al. Land subsidence due to groundwater drawdown in Shanghai[J]. Géotechnique, 2004, 54(2): 143-147. |
[10] | LI M G, CHEN J J, XIA X H, et al. Statistical and hydro-mechanical coupling analyses on groundwater drawdown and soil deformation caused by dewatering in a multi-aquifer-aquitard system[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 589: 125365. |
[11] | LI M G, CHEN J J, XU Y S, et al. Effects of groundwater exploitation and recharge on land subsidence and infrastructure settlement patterns in Shanghai[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 282: 105995. |
[12] | WU Y X, SHEN S L, WU H N, et al. Environmental protection using dewatering technology in a deep confined aquifer beneath a shallow aquifer[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 196: 59-70. |
[13] | ZHANG Y Q, LI M G, WANG J H, et al. Field tests of pumping-recharge technology for deep confined aquifers and its application to a deep excavation[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 228: 249-259. |
[14] | ZHANG Y Q, WANG J H, CHEN J J, et al. Numerical study on the responses of groundwater and strata to pumping and recharge in a deep confined aquifer[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 548: 342-352. |
[15] | 王卫东, 王浩然, 徐中华. 上海地区基坑开挖数值分析中土体HS-Small模型参数的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(6): 1766-1774. |
[15] | WANG Weidong, WANG Haoran, XU Zhonghua. Study of parameters of HS-Small model used in numerical analysis of excavations in Shanghai area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(6): 1766-1774. |
[16] | 王建秀, 吴林高, 朱雁飞, 等. 地铁车站深基坑降水诱发沉降机制及计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(5): 1010-1019. |
[16] | WANG Jianxiu, WU Lingao, ZHU Yanfei, et al. Mechanism of dewatering-induced ground subsidence in deep subway station pit and calculation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(5): 1010-1019. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |