制导、导航与控制

基于累积前景理论和三支决策的无人机态势评估

展开
  • a.南京航空航天大学 航天学院,南京 210016
    b.南京航空航天大学 计算机科学与技术学院/人工智能学院/软件学院,南京 210016
    c.南京航空航天大学 高安全系统的软件开发与验证技术工信部重点实验室,南京 210016
李伟湋(1981-),女,湖北省宜昌市人,副研究员,从事机器学习、软件智能化等方向研究;E-mail:liweiwei@nuaa.edu.cn.

收稿日期: 2021-10-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(61906090)

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Situation Assessment Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory and Three-Way Decision

Expand
  • a. College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    b. College of Computer Science and Technology/College of Artificial Intelligence/College of Software, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    c. Key Laboratory for Safety-Critical Software Development and Verification of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2021-10-08

  Online published: 2022-06-21

摘要

现有的无人机态势评估方法没有考虑复杂外界环境对决策者的影响,并且通常只能得到评估的排序结果,决策者需要在短时间内进行决策,常出现误判或错失打击窗口期.针对该问题,提出一种基于累积前景理论的三支决策模型.首先,通过直觉模糊接近于理想值的排序方法求取目标的条件概率, 得到态势评估结果;之后基于累积前景理论对无人机获取的直觉模糊态势信息进行计算,得到每个目标执行不同动作时对应的累积前景价值;最后,基于累积前景价值最大化的原则,推导出新的三支决策规则,对态势评估结果进行三支划分.实验分析表明:该方法不仅得到了目标威胁排序,而且对目标威胁等级进行客观分类;同时在评估过程中考虑决策者的心理,得到符合决策者特质的目标威胁评估结果,为复杂多变的空战提供一种合理的决策支持.

本文引用格式

李伟湋, 高培雪, 陈进, 路玉卿 . 基于累积前景理论和三支决策的无人机态势评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022 , 56(11) : 1479 -1490 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.400

Abstract

General uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) situation assessment methods do not consider the influence of complex external environment on the decision-maker, and usually only get the ranking results of the evaluation. Since the decision-maker needs to make decisions in a short period of time, misjudgments or missing strike windows often occur. To address this problem, a three-way decision model based on the cumulative prospect theory is proposed. First, the method the utilizes intuitionistic fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution to estimate the conditional probability of each target and obtains the situation assessment result. Next, the method calculates the intuitionistic fuzzy situation information obtained by the UAV based on the cumulative prospect theory, and obtains the corresponding cumulative prospect value when each target performs different actions. Finally, based on the principle of maximizing the cumulative prospect value, a new three-way decision rule is derived to divide the situational assessment results into three regions. The experimental analysis shows that the method not only obtains the target threat ranking, but also classifies the target threat level objectively. At the same time, it considers the psychology of the decision-maker in the assessment process, and obtains the target threat assessment results that meet the traits of the decision-maker, providing a reasonable decision support for the complex and changing air combat.

参考文献

[1] 袁覃恩, 慕晓冬, 易昭湘, 等. 基于局部动态贝叶斯网络的无人机态势评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(4): 57-61.
[1] YUAN Tianen, MU Xiaodong, YI Zhaoxiang, et al. Real-time evaluation of UAV situation based on local dynamic Bayesian network[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2018, 43(4): 57-61.
[2] SHI G Q, PU J W, ZHANG L, et al. Situation assessment based on multi-entity Bayesian network[C]∥2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control & Automation. Singapore: IEEE, 2020: 702-707.
[3] 高阳阳, 余敏建, 王子博琳. 基于云模型和改进熵权的空战多目标威胁等级评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(9): 35-39.
[3] GAO Yangyang, YU Minjian, WANG Zibolin. Target threat assessment technology for UAV air combat based on cloud model and improved entropy weight[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2018, 43(9): 35-39.
[4] 奚之飞, 徐安, 寇英信, 等. 基于PCA-MPSO-ELM的空战目标威胁评估[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 216-231.
[4] XI Zhifei, XU An, KOU Yingxin, et al. Target threat assessment in air combat based on PCA-MPSO-ELM algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 216-231.
[5] GAO Y, LI D. Unmanned aerial vehicle swarm distributed cooperation method based on situation awareness consensus and its information processing mechanism[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 188: 105034.
[6] 韩博文, 姚佩阳, 钟赟, 等. 基于QABC-IFMADM算法的有人/无人机编队作战威胁评估[J]. 电子学报, 2018, 46(7): 1584-1592.
[6] HAN B, YAO P, ZHONG Y, et al. Threat assessment of manned/unmanned aerial vehicle formation based on QABC-IFMADM algorithm[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2018, 46(7): 1584.
[7] ZHANG K, KONG W R, LIU P P, et al. Assessment and sequencing of air target threat based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and dynamic VIKOR[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(2): 305-310.
[8] GAO Y, LI D, ZHONG H. A novel target threat assessment method based on three-way decisions under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making environment[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 87: 103276.
[9] 赵晓冬, 王飞, 张妮. 一种基于前景理论的毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊不确定语言 ELECTRE 多属性决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2245-2251.
[9] ZHAO Xiaodong, WANG Fei, ZHANG Ni. Method for multi-attribute decision-making with Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic ELECTRE based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2245-2251.
[10] 奚之飞, 徐安, 寇英信, 等. 基于前景理论的空战目标威胁评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(6): 1236-1248.
[10] XI Zhifei, XU An, KOU Yingxin, et al. Air combat target threat assessment based on prospect theory[J]. Acta Armamentraii, 2020, 41(6): 1236-1248.
[11] 胡涛, 王栋, 黄震宇, 等. 基于前景理论和 VIKOR 法的空战威胁评估[J]. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 21(5): 62-68.
[11] HU Tao, WANG Dong, HUANG Zhenyu, et al. Air combat threat assessment based on prospect theory and VIKOR method[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 21(5): 62-68.
[12] YAO Y Y. The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models[J]. Information Sciences, 2011, 181(6): 1080-1096.
[13] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
[14] 马健, 孙秀霞. 基于效用曲线改进的前景理论价值函数[J]. 信息与控制, 2011, 40(4): 501-506.
[14] MA Jian, SUN Xiuxia. Modified value function in prospect theory based on utility curve[J]. Information and Control, 2011, 40(4): 501-506.
[15] GUO Z, CHEN W, ZHANG J, et al. Hazard assessment of potentially dangerous bodies within a cliff based on the Fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of the Mogao Grottoes, China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2017, 76(3): 1009-1020.
[16] WANG Y, LIU S Y, NIU W, et al. Threat assessment method based on intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measurement reasoning with orientation[J]. China Communications, 2014, 11(6): 119-128.
[17] XU H, ZHOU J, XU W. A decision-making rule for modeling travelers’ route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(2): 218-228.
文章导航

/