孔板后压力恢复长度的影响因数定量关系
收稿日期: 2021-04-25
网络出版日期: 2022-08-26
基金资助
宁夏高等学校科学技术研究项目(NGY2018241)
Quantitative Factors of Recovery Length of Flow Pressure Behind Orifice Plate
Received date: 2021-04-25
Online published: 2022-08-26
孔板消能工具有构造方便、消能效率高以及经济等优点,在我国水电工程及泄流工程中得到广泛应用.在多级孔板设计中,孔板间距与孔板后压力恢复长度有关,而孔板后压力恢复长度的研究却很少.利用数值模拟法对孔板后压力恢复长度的影响因数进行了定量分析.结果表明,孔板后压力恢复长度主要由孔板孔径比、孔板相对厚度以及流经孔板流体的雷诺数等相关参数决定:当雷诺数增大到一个定值时,孔板后压力恢复长度几乎不随雷诺数的变化而变化;当孔板相对厚度和孔板孔径比在一定范围内,孔板相对厚度不变,孔板孔径比减小,孔板后压力恢复长度增大;当孔板孔径比不变时,孔板相对厚度增大,孔板后压力恢复长度减小.通过多元回归分析和曲线拟合得到孔板后压力恢复长度的经验公式,并进行室内试验验证,为多级孔板间距设计提供理论依据.
季鹏翔, 艾万政, 丁天明 . 孔板后压力恢复长度的影响因数定量关系[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022 , 56(8) : 1051 -1056 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.138
The orifice plate has the advantages of convenient construction, high energy dissipation efficiency, and economy, and is widely used in hydropower engineering and discharge engineering. The recovery length of the flow pressure behind the orifice plate is related to the distance arrangement between orifice plates in multi-stage orifice plate design. However, little research has been conducted on the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate. The numerical simulation method is used to quantitatively study the influencing factors of the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate, and the results show that the recovery length of the flow pressure behind the orifice plate is mainly dominated by the aperture ratio of orifice plate, the relative thickness of the orifice plate, and the Reynolds number of fluids flowing through orifice plate. As the Reynolds number increases to a fixed value, the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate does not change. When the relative thickness of the aperture ratio of the orifice plate are within a certain range, the relative thickness of the orifice plate will not change, the aperture ratio of the orifice plate decreases, and the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate increases. As the diameter ratio of orifice plate remains unchanged, the relative thickness of the orifice plate increases, and the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate decreases. The empirical formula for the pressure recovery length behind the orifice plate is obtained by multivariate regression analysis and curve fitting, and the indoor test verification is adopted, which provide theoretical basis for distance arrangement between orifice plates in multi-stage orifice plate design.
[1] | AI W Z, WANG J H. Hydraulic characteristics of orifice plate[J]. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 2019, 48(6): 957-962. |
[2] | 艾万政, 周琦. 孔板后回流区长度数值模拟研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2011, 26(6): 731-735. |
[2] | AI Wanzheng, ZHOU Qi. Study on the length of the recirculation region behind the orifice plate based on numerical simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2011, 26(6): 731-735. |
[3] | AHMED E N, GHANEM A A. A novel comprehensive correlation for discharge coefficient of square-edged concentric orifice plate at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2020, 73: 101751. |
[4] | 夏庆福, 倪汉根. 洞塞消能的数值模拟[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 34(8): 37-42. |
[4] | XIA Qingfu, NI Hangen. Numerical simulation of plug energy dissipater[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(8): 37-42. |
[5] | AI W Z, ZHU P F. Correction and laboratory investigation for energy loss coefficient of square-edged orifice plate[J]. Science Progress, 2021, 104(2): 003685042110185. |
[6] | ALABAS SIBA M A, MAHMOOD W M F W, NUAWI M Z, et al. Numerical investigation of 3-D turbulent flow in orifice plate within a pipe[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015, 761: 27-31. |
[7] | TORKAMANZAD N, HOSSEINZADEH DALIR A, SALMASI F, et al. Hydraulic jump below abrupt asymmetric expanding stilling basin on rough bed[J]. Water, 2019, 11(9): 1756. |
[8] | AI W Z, ZHOU Q. Hydraulic characteristics of multi-stage orifice plate[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2014, 19(3): 361-366. |
[9] | AI W Z, WU J H. Comparison on hydraulic characteristics between orifice plate and plug[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2014, 19(4): 476-480. |
[10] | 董亮. 齿墩间距对二级齿墩消能工消能效果的影响研究[J]. 水利技术监督, 2019, 27(6): 253-256. |
[10] | DONG Liang. Study on the influence of spacing between teeth piers on energy dissipation effect of secondary teeth pier energy dissipator[J]. Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 2019, 27(6): 253-256. |
[11] | AI W Z, DING T M. Sharp-edged orifice plate's wall pressure characteristics[J]. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 2019, 48(6): 952-956. |
[12] | 张晓艳, 杨宇, 姚佳伟, 等. 孔板消能工消能率的二维数值模拟[J]. 山西科技, 2018, 33(1): 116-118. |
[12] | ZHANG Xiaoyan, YANG Yu, YAO Jiawei, et al. 2-D numerical simulation of the energy dissipation ratio of orifice energy dissipator[J]. Shanxi Science and Technology, 2018, 33(1): 116-118. |
[13] | 丁天明, 张敏, 艾万政. 洞塞消能特性数值模拟研究[J]. 浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(1): 48-51. |
[13] | DING Tianming, ZHANG Min, AI Wanzheng. Research on plug hydraulic characteristics[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2016, 35(1): 48-51. |
[14] | BHATE R R, MORE K T, BHAJANTRI M R, et al. Hydraulic model studies for optimising the design of two tier spillway: A case study[J]. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 25(1): 28-37. |
[15] | TUKIMAN M M, GHAZALI M M, SADIKIN A, et al. CFD simulation of flow through an orifice plate[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 243: 012036. |
[16] | 杨杰, 邓德兵, 赵清森, 等. 孔板厚度对核电站给水流量测量精度影响的数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(6): 2328-2333. |
[16] | YANG Jie, DENG Debing, ZHAO Qingsen, et al. Effect of orifice plate thickness on measurement accuracy of feedwater flow rate in nuclear power plants[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(6): 2328-2333. |
[17] | TANG T F, YANG G, ZHANG D J, et al. A hydrodynamic prediction model of throttle orifice plate using space filling and adaptive sampling method[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 62(3): 1563-1578. |
[18] | WU J H, AI W Z, ZHOU Q. Head loss coefficient of orifice plate energy dissipator[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 48(4): 526-530. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |