双桨船螺旋桨空泡脉动压力的试验及数值研究

展开
  • 海军工程大学 舰船与海洋学院, 武汉 430033
徐 野(1991-),男,吉林省长春市人,博士生,主要研究方向为船舶流体动力性能

收稿日期: 2019-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51479207)

Test and Numerical Study of Propeller Cavitation Induced Fluctuating Pressure of Twin-Propeller Ship

Expand
  • College of Naval Architecture and Ocean, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China

Received date: 2019-03-13

  Online published: 2020-08-18

摘要

为研究高速双桨船螺旋桨空泡状态下的脉动压力特性,在深水拖曳水池中开展了螺旋桨敞水试验,在大型循环水槽中使用完整船模开展了螺旋桨船后水动力性能、脉动压力测量和空泡观测试验.试验结果表明,脉动压力的最大幅值随螺旋桨转速的增加而增大,不稳定片空泡会导致脉动压力高阶分量增加;随着空泡的发展,脉动压力幅值最大位置逐渐向船体内侧移动,螺旋桨达到一定转速后,其脉动压力分布基本保持不变.采用剪切应力输运(SST)k-ω模型及流体体积(VOF)方法,建立了螺旋桨脉动压力和空泡的计算流体动力学(CFD)数值计算方法,并通过计算与试验结果的对比发现,该方法的计算结果在无空泡和高转速工况下与试验结果吻合较好.由于不能很好地对不稳定片空泡进行模拟,在其出现时脉动压力计算值偏大.计算值的衰减和试验中两桨的相位差导致靠近船体内侧的监测点脉动压力误差较大.

本文引用格式

徐野, 熊鹰, 黄政 . 双桨船螺旋桨空泡脉动压力的试验及数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020 , 54(8) : 831 -838 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.069

Abstract

To study propeller fluctuating pressure characteristic of highspeed twin-propeller ship in cavitation condition, a propeller open water test is conducted in deep water towing tank, while propeller after hull performance, fluctuating pressure measurement, and cavitation observation tests are conducted in a large circulating water channel with a complete ship model. The test results show that the maximum amplitude of fluctuating pressure increases with propeller speed, and unstable sheet cavitation leads to the increase in higher order components of fluctuating pressure. With the development of cavitation, the location of the maximum amplitude of fluctuating pressure moves to the inside of the model until distribution of fluctuating pressure keeps constant when the propeller reaches a certain speed. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical method to evaluate fluctuating pressure and cavitation of propeller is established using the shear stress transport (SST) k-ω model and the VOF method. The comparison of numerical and test results illustrates that the numerical results of fluctuating pressure have a good agreement with test results in non-cavitation and high rotation speed conditions, but the numerical values calculated are larger due to imprecise simulation of unstable sheet cavitation. There exists a large error in the numerical results of fluctuating pressure on the inside of the model which results from the attenuation of the value calculated and the phase difference of the two propellers in the test.

参考文献

[1] 盛振邦, 刘应中. 船舶原理[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2004.
[1] SHENG Zhenbang, LIU Yingzhong. Ship theory[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2004.
[2] 伍锐, 季盛, 沈浩, 等. 螺旋桨诱导船体表面脉动压力预报的试验研究[J]. 上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, 2011,34(1):15-20.
[2] WU Rui, JI Sheng, SHEN Hao, et al. Experimental study of predicting propeller-induced ship hull fluctuation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute, 2011,34(1):15-20.
[3] RIZZUTO E, TANI G, VIVIANI M. Experimental analysis of the influence of ship wake scaling on marine propeller radiated noise and pressure pulses[C]// 21st International Congress on Sound and Vibration. Beijing: ASC, 2014: 1-8.
[4] 舒敏骅, 沈浩, 尤云祥, 等. 非均匀来流条件下螺旋桨诱导的脉动压力变化特性试验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017,38(6):1287-1293.
[4] SHU Minhua, SHEN Hao, YOU Yunxiang, et al. Experimental study on variation characteristics of pressure fluctuations induced by propeller in non-uniform flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017,38(6):1287-1293.
[5] 马艳, 陆芳, 黄红波, 等. 集装箱船模型螺旋桨空泡与脉动压力比对试验研究[C]// 第二十五届全国水动力学研讨会暨第十二届全国水动力学学术. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2013: 588-594.
[5] MA Yan, LU Fang, HUANG Hongbo, et al. Compare test study on propeller cavitation and fluctuation pressure of container ship model[C]//25th National Hydrodynamic Seminar and 12th National Hydrodynamic Academic Conference. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2013: 588-594.
[6] 张志荣, 朱建良, 赵峰, 等. 减压拖曳水池中螺旋桨空泡诱导的船体脉动压力测量方法研究[J]. 船舶力学, 2001,5(4):1-6.
[6] ZHANG Zhirong, ZHU Jianliang, ZHAO Feng, et al. Study on experimental method of measuring fluctuating pressure on ship hull induced by cavitating propeller in depressurized towing tank[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2001,5(4):1-6.
[7] 叶金铭, 熊鹰, 孙海涛, 等. 空泡螺旋桨诱导的双桨船脉动压力数值预报[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2013,34(5):568-574.
[7] YE Jinming, XIONG Ying, SUN Haitao, et al. Numerical prediction of pressure fluctuations induced by cavitating propeller on twin-screw ship[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2013,34(5):568-574.
[8] GüNG?R E, BEDII OZDEMIR I. Simulation of oblique propeller flow including cavitation and pressure pulses[J]. Underwater Technology, 2016,33(4):203-213.
[9] 刘辉, 冯榆坤, 陈作钢, 等. 船舶艏侧推器脉动压力数值计算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017,51(3):294-299.
[9] LIU Hui, FENG Yukun, CHEN Zuogang, et al. Numerical study of pressure fluctuation for bow thruster[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017,51(3):294-299.
[10] 黄红波, 陆芳, 施小勇, 等. 民船螺旋桨空泡与脉动压力特征关系研究[C]//第二十二届全国水动力学研讨会暨第十届全国水动力学学术会议. 上海: 海洋出版社, 2011: 500-508.
[10] HUANG Hongbo, LU Fang, SHI Xiaoyong, et al. Characteristic study between cavitation pattern and pressure fluctuation for commercial carrier[C]//22nd National Hydrodynamic Seminar and 10th National Hydrodynamic Academic Conference. Shanghai: China Ocean Press, 2011: 500-508.
[11] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994,32(8):1598-1605.
[12] SCHNERR G H, SAUER J. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics[C]// 4th International Conference on Multiphase Flow. New Orleans: ICMF, 2001: 1-8.
文章导航

/