学报(中文)

国际海事组织参数横摇Level 2衡准运动预报方法选型

展开
  • 中国船级社 上海规范研究所,上海 200135

网络出版日期: 2018-03-28

基金资助

工业和信息化部专项科研项目([2016]26)

Model Selection Study on Motion Prediction Methods of IMO’s Parametric Rolling Level 2 Criteria

Expand
  • Shanghai Rules & Research Institute, China Classification Society, Shanghai 200135, China

Online published: 2018-03-28

摘要

针对参数横摇Level 2衡准运动预报方法的选型研究,对于制定合理的动稳性衡准、提高船舶的安全水平具有重要意义.基于模型试验数据验证并对比了3种备选的非线性力学方法的预报精度,包括时域方法和平均方法,并分析了引起差异的原因.在此基础上,通过对比大量实船以及事故船的敏感性水平预报结果,为Level 2衡准预报方法的选型提出了若干建议.该研究首次针对参数横摇Level 2衡准运动预报方法开展了精度验证和对比分析,并提出了时域方法参数设置建议,有助于第2代完整稳性衡准的制定.

本文引用格式

周耀华,张高峰 . 国际海事组织参数横摇Level 2衡准运动预报方法选型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018 , 52(3) : 283 -290 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.03.005

Abstract

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) lunched a new round of model selection for motion prediction method of the Level 2 parametric rolling (PR) criteria in 2016. The model selection study on prediction method is very important for developing reasonable dynamic stability criteria and increasing the safety level of ship. According to test data, three alternative nonlinear dynamics methods are verified, validated and compared, including time-domain method and averaging method, and the reasons for difference of prediction precision have been analyzed. On this basis, vulnerability levels for large scale sample calculations and accident ship have been obtained and compared, and several suggestions about model selection for motion prediction method of the Level 2 PR criteria have also been given. The accuracy validation and comparison study are executed firstly for the motion prediction methods of Level 2 criteria of PR in this study, and parameters setting of time-domain method are also provided. This is helpful to the development of second generation stability criteria.

参考文献

[1]China. Comments on Level 2 criteria of parametric rolling (SDC 2/5/1)[C]∥Ship Design and Construction 2nd Session. London: International Maritime Organization, 2014: 1-4. [2]Japan. Information collected by the correspondence group on intact stability regarding the second generation intact stability criteria development (INF8)[C]∥Ship Design and Construction (SDC) 1st Session. London: International Maritime Organization, 2014: 1-130. [3]周耀华, 张高峰, 马宁. 基于IMO 二代稳性衡准的实船参数横摇敏感性及衡准完善[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(3): 425-436. ZHOU Yaohua, ZHANG Gaofeng, MA Ning. Vulnerability check and further development of parametric roll criteria of 2nd generation intact stabi-lity code of IMO based on full scale ship data[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(3): 425-436. [4]马坤, 王婷, 徐光龙. 船舶参数横摇薄弱性衡准样船计算分析[J]. 中国造船, 2015, 56(增刊1): 15-21. MA Kun, WANG Ting, XU Guanglong. Calculation and analysis of vulnerability criteria in parametric rolling for sample ships[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2015, 56 (Sup 1): 15-21. [5]IMO. Finalization of second generation intact stability criteria—Report of the working group (Part 1) (WP.5/Annex 4)[C]∥Ship Design and Construction (SDC) 3rd Session. London: International Maritime Organization, 2016: 1-34. [6]FRANCESCUTTO A. An experimental investigation of parametric rolling in head waves[J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2011, 123(2): 65-69. [7]LU J, UMEDA J, MA K. Predicting parametric rolling in irregular head seas with added resistance taken into account[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2011, 16(4): 462-471. [8]ZHOU Y H, MA N, LU J, et al. A study on hybrid prediction method for ship parametric rolling[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(4): 617-628.
Options
文章导航

/