上海交通大学学报

上海交通大学学报 >

2018 , Vol. 52 >Issue 2: 242 - 246

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.02.018

学报（中文）

网络团购行为的影响因素分析

展开
  • 1. 上海交通大学 马克思主义学院, 上海 200240； 2. 上海交通大学 安泰经济与管理学院， 上海 200030； 3. 中国人民大学 经济学院，北京 100872

网络出版日期: 2018-03-01

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（71572110）

收起

Analysis About the Influence Factors of the Network Group Buying Behavior

Expand
  • 1. School of Marxism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; 3. School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Online published: 2018-03-01

Fold

摘要

基于信息分享对消费者活动的影响，研究消费者形成团购的各项行为如何变化、由谁主导，是团购行为研究过程中的难点.在网络购买系统中，时间或货物资源是有限的，购买和销售博弈双方的利益随着谈判时间的增加而出现边际效应，当网络中有新的消费者加入的时候，其他消费者将缩短谈判时间；没有团购经验的消费者将缩短谈判时间，快速加入团购活动.

关键词： 购买联盟; 信息分享; 消费者剩余

本文引用格式

全林1，顾锋2，李卿3 . 网络团购行为的影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018 , 52(2) : 242 -246 . DOI: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.02.018

Abstract

Based on information sharing influence on consumer activities, the paper studies how consumers group buying behavior changes and who dominated, which are difficult points in the process of group behavior research. In the online purchasing system, time and resource are limited, and both sides in business have marginal effect with the increase of negotiation time. When new consumers join in the network, other consumers will shorten the negotiation time. Meanwhile, new consumers without group purchase experience will shorten the negotiation time, and quickly join in the group activities.

Key words： buying alliance; information sharing; consumer surplus

参考文献

［1］CHENG H H, HUANG S W. Exploring antecedents and consequence of online group-buying intention: An extended perspective on theory of planned behavior［J］. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33(1): 185-198. ［2］HSU M H, CHANG C M, CHU K K, et al. Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS success model and trust［J］. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 36: 234-245. ［3］CHENG H H, HUANG S W. Exploring antecedents and consequence of online group-buying intention: An extended perspective on theory of planned behavior［J］. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33 (1): 185-198. ［4］ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG Z L, WANG F, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of online group buying in the restaurant industry［J］. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013, 35: 237-245. ［5］GRANDHI S, CHUGH R, WIBOWO S. Factors influencing customers’ intention to purchase deals from Australian group buying sites［C］∥Proceedings of the 24th International Business Information Management Association Conference. KS Soliman: International Business Information Management Association Cofe-rence, 2014: 1853-1856. ［6］CHEN N, RAU P L P. Effects of trust on group buying websites in China［J］. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, 30(8): 615-626. ［7］GAFNI R, GERI N, AZIZ Y. Daily deal website: Mostly but not all about location［J］. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2014, 54 (4): 80-87. ［8］TRAN T, DESIRAJU R. Group-buying and channel coordination under asymmetric information［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 256(1): 68-75. ［9］ZHOU Y, XIE J X. Potentially self-defeating: Group buying in a two-tier supply chain［J］. Omega, 2014, 49: 42-52. ［10］ZHANG G Q, SHANG J, YILDIRIM P. Optimal pricing for group buying with network effects［J］. Omega, 2016, 63: 69-82.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉