上海交通大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 454-463.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.036
收稿日期:
2021-01-25
出版日期:
2022-04-28
发布日期:
2022-05-07
通讯作者:
周洁
E-mail:15050@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:
李泽垚(1994-),男,河北省石家庄市人,博士生,从事地铁隧道及联络通道施工等方面的研究工作.
基金资助:
LI Zeyao1, ZHOU Jie1(), TIAN Wanjun2, PEI Wansheng3
Received:
2021-01-25
Online:
2022-04-28
Published:
2022-05-07
Contact:
ZHOU Jie
E-mail:15050@tongji.edu.cn
摘要:
地铁在地铁站附近的加减速运动会对地基土产生一定的影响.土体经过倾斜削样后使用动三轴进行不排水动力测试以研究地铁进出站作用下进出站距离、加速度、动应力幅值及固结围压对饱和软黏土累积塑性变形的影响.结果表明:进出站变频荷载循环作用下软黏土累积塑性应变曲线可大致划分为爆发增长-较快增长-逐渐稳定3个阶段.距地铁站越近、动应力幅值越大、固结围压越小,土体进入逐渐稳定阶段所需的进出站次数越少,土体竖向变形越大,剪切变形越小.进出站加速度值越大,土体竖向变形越小、剪切变形越大.对于实际工程而言,地铁运营初期,进站区间土体的沉降变形、出站区间土体水平位移、较大加速度工况下的水平位移、较小加速度工况下的沉降、高动应力幅值的工况及低固结应力的土体区域是工程地质灾害防治的重点.
中图分类号:
李泽垚, 周洁, 田万君, 裴万胜. 地铁变频荷载循环作用下饱和软黏土累积塑性变形[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 454-463.
LI Zeyao, ZHOU Jie, TIAN Wanjun, PEI Wansheng. Accumulative Plastic Deformation of Saturated Soft Clay Under Variable Frequency Cyclic Loading for Subway[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(4): 454-463.
表2
软黏土累积变形试验方案
试样编号 | 固结围压/kPa | 进出站加速度/(m·s-2) | 列车竖向动应力/kPa | 进出站距离/m | 试验加载动应力/kPa | 削样角度/(°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 125 | -0.50 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.08±15.04 | 2.91 |
A2 | 125 | -0.50 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.08±15.04 | 2.91 |
A3 | 125 | -0.50 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.08±15.04 | 2.91 |
A4 | 125 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A5 | 125 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A6 | 125 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A7 | 125 | -0.60 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.11±15.06 | 3.49 |
A8 | 125 | -0.60 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.11±15.06 | 3.49 |
A9 | 125 | -0.60 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.11±15.06 | 3.49 |
A10 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±10 | +50 | 30.09±10.03 | 3.20 |
A11 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±10 | +150 | 30.09±10.03 | 3.20 |
A12 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±10 | +250 | 30.09±10.03 | 3.20 |
A13 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±20 | +50 | 30.09±20.06 | 3.20 |
A14 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±20 | +150 | 30.09±20.06 | 3.20 |
A15 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±20 | +250 | 30.09±20.06 | 3.20 |
A16 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A17 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A18 | 100 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A19 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A20 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
A21 | 150 | -0.55 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.09±15.05 | 3.20 |
B1 | 125 | +0.85 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.22±15.11 | 4.92 |
B2 | 125 | +0.85 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.22±15.11 | 4.92 |
B3 | 125 | +0.85 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.22±15.11 | 4.92 |
B4 | 125 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B5 | 125 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B6 | 125 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B7 | 125 | +0.95 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.28±15.14 | 5.49 |
B8 | 125 | +0.95 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.28±15.14 | 5.49 |
B9 | 125 | +0.95 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.28±15.14 | 5.49 |
B10 | 125 | +1.00 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.31±15.15 | 5.77 |
B11 | 125 | +1.00 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.31±15.15 | 5.77 |
B12 | 125 | +1.00 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.31±15.15 | 5.77 |
B13 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±10 | +50 | 30.25±10.08 | 5.20 |
B14 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±10 | +150 | 30.25±10.08 | 5.20 |
B15 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±10 | +250 | 30.25±10.08 | 5.20 |
B16 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±20 | +50 | 30.25±20.17 | 5.20 |
B17 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±20 | +150 | 30.25±20.17 | 5.20 |
B18 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±20 | +250 | 30.25±20.17 | 5.20 |
B19 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B20 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B21 | 100 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B22 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +50 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B23 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +150 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
B24 | 150 | +0.90 | 30±15 | +250 | 30.25±15.13 | 5.20 |
表3
数据模型拟合结果
试样编号 | 竖向应变 | 切应变 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | c | 相关系数 | a | b | c | 相关系数 | ||
A2 | 1.729 | 0.462 | 0.441 | 0.996 | 17.739 | 3.252 | 0.491 | 0.990 | |
A4 | 0.964 | 0.424 | 0.432 | 0.996 | 5.979 | 2.628 | 0.432 | 0.996 | |
A5 | 2.026 | 0.467 | 0.452 | 0.990 | 12.566 | 2.897 | 0.452 | 0.996 | |
A6 | 3.497 | 0.492 | 0.502 | 0.997 | 21.688 | 3.053 | 0.502 | 0.992 | |
A8 | 2.606 | 0.478 | 0.491 | 0.997 | 9.848 | 2.631 | 0.441 | 0.988 | |
A11 | 2.659 | 0.488 | 0.434 | 0.994 | 16.489 | 3.025 | 0.434 | 0.996 | |
A14 | 1.551 | 0.436 | 0.472 | 0.992 | 10.024 | 2.754 | 0.496 | 0.989 | |
A17 | 1.922 | 0.451 | 0.452 | 0.994 | 11.922 | 2.799 | 0.452 | 0.990 | |
A20 | 2.543 | 0.482 | 0.484 | 0.997 | 15.775 | 2.987 | 0.484 | 0.992 | |
B2 | 3.403 | 0.487 | 0.476 | 0.988 | 13.688 | 1.960 | 0.476 | 0.996 | |
B4 | 1.307 | 0.434 | 0.400 | 0.995 | 4.970 | 1.651 | 0.400 | 0.988 | |
B5 | 3.943 | 0.489 | 0.492 | 0.989 | 14.988 | 1.858 | 0.492 | 0.987 | |
B6 | 8.131 | 0.502 | 0.551 | 0.987 | 30.898 | 1.908 | 0.550 | 0.987 | |
B8 | 4.182 | 0.491 | 0.500 | 0.993 | 15.067 | 1.768 | 0.500 | 0.990 | |
B11 | 5.312 | 0.493 | 0.520 | 0.990 | 18.194 | 1.689 | 0.520 | 0.990 | |
B14 | 4.079 | 0.499 | 0.464 | 0.990 | 15.506 | 1.897 | 0.464 | 0.994 | |
B17 | 3.327 | 0.468 | 0.520 | 0.993 | 12.647 | 1.780 | 0.520 | 0.989 | |
B20 | 3.515 | 0.481 | 0.510 | 0.996 | 13.362 | 1.828 | 0.510 | 0.990 | |
B23 | 3.764 | 0.496 | 0.461 | 0.987 | 14.307 | 1.886 | 0.461 | 0.989 |
[1] |
MICHALTSOS G T. Dynamic behaviour of a single-span beam subjected to loads moving with variable speeds[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 258(2): 359-372.
doi: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5141 URL |
[2] | 卢正, 姚海林, 吴莎, 等. 黏弹性地基板在矩形变速荷载作用下的振动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(11): 3613-3618. |
LU Zheng, YAO Hailin, WU Sha, et al. Vibration analysis of a plate on viscoelastic foundation under moving rectangular loads with variable speeds[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(11): 3613-3618. | |
[3] | 张楠, 夏禾, 程潜, 等. 制动力作用下车辆-车站结构耦合系统分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(2): 138-143. |
ZHANG Nan, XIA He, CHENG Qian, et al. Analysis method for a vehicle structure coupled system under braking force[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(2): 138-143. | |
[4] | 张谦, 陈文化. 地铁列车进站引起场地柱面纵向振动[J]. 振动工程学报, 2017, 30(3): 442-448. |
ZHANG Qian, CHEN Wenhua. Cylindrical longitudinal vibration while metro train arriving at station[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2017, 30(3): 442-448. | |
[5] |
HE W. Vertical dynamics of a single-span beam subjected to moving mass-suspended payload system with variable speeds[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018, 418: 36-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.12.030 URL |
[6] | 张谦, 陈文化. 地铁列车出、进站加、减速的轴向激励引起出平面振动[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(24): 96-101. |
ZHANG Qian, CHEN Wenhua. Out-of-plane vibration induced by axial excitation while a metro train arriving at or leaving a station[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(24): 96-101. | |
[7] | 陈文化, 张谦. 地铁列车进出站时土层空间振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3656-3661. |
CHEN Wenhua, ZHANG Qian. Space vibration of subsoil during metro train arriving at or leaving station[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3656-3661. | |
[8] | 吴威, 李明广, 史玉金, 等. 上海地层长期变形特性及其对基础设施的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(11): 1429-1436. |
WU Wei, LI Mingguang, SHI Yujin, et al. Long-term deformation characteristics of Shanghai soil layer and its influence on infrastructure[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018, 52(11): 1429-1436. | |
[9] | 曾宇清, 于卫东, 丁勇, 等. 基于加速度响应的轨道监测研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2004, 25(6): 42-47. |
ZENG Yuqing, YU Weidong, DING Yong, et al. Track monitoring based on locomotive acceleration response[J]. China Railway Science, 2004, 25(6): 42-47. | |
[10] | 张曦, 唐益群, 周念清, 等. 地铁振动荷载作用下隧道周围饱和软黏土动力响应研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(2): 85-88. |
ZHANG Xi, TANG Yiqun, ZHOU Nianqing, et al. Dynamic response of saturated soft clay around a subway tunnel under vibration load[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(2): 85-88. | |
[11] | 唐益群, 李金章, 李珺. 冻融饱和粉砂动力性能试验[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(2): 76-83. |
TANG Yiqun, LI Jinzhang, LI Jun. Experimental study on dynamic cumulative axial strain performance of artificial frost-thawed saturated silty sand[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(2): 76-83. | |
[12] | 闫春岭, 唐益群, 刘莎. 地铁荷载下饱和软黏土累积变形特性[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(7): 978-982. |
YAN Chunling, TANG Yiqun, LIU Sha. Accumulative deformation characteristics of saturated soft clay under subway loading in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2011, 39(7): 978-982. | |
[13] | 徐杰. 轨道交通荷载作用下地层系统非线性固有频率及宏微观环境振动响应研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2018. |
XU Jie. Study on the nonlinear natural frequency and macro-micro environmental vibration response of the ground system under the load of rail transit[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2018. |
[1] | 周洁, 任君杰. 沿海组合地层人工冻结过程中的水分迁移及变形特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 675-683. |
[2] | 张润铎, 聂伟荣, 丘伟祥. 双向抗高过载微流体惯性开关[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 826-833. |
[3] | 熊雪娇, 贾志海, 邓勇, 费媛媛. 微结构梯度能表面振动液滴的运动特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 455-461. |
[4] | 刘晓阳, 徐炜莉, 陈基茗, 徐沛然, 周祥祥. 基于被动跟踪环境的自适应修正角度滤波算法[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4(2): 48-. |
[5] | 郭惠勇,黄淇. 基于GARCH效应和改进罚指标的时域非线性损伤识别[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1326-1334. |
[6] | 陈伟业a,邹天下a,唐鼎a,郭飞鹏a,李大永a, b. 铝箔板材成形极限试验及数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2018, 52(9): 1081-1085. |
[7] | 訚耀保,王玉. 3维离心环境下射流管伺服阀的零偏特性 [J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2017, 51(8): 984-991. |
[8] | 孟振, 陈锦剑, 王建华. 基于修正剑桥模型的软黏土中沉桩过程欧拉-拉格朗日耦合模拟分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(03): 263-268. |
[9] | 米百刚,詹浩. 先进飞行器动导数数值模拟新方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2016, 50(04): 619-624. |
[10] | 李磊1,2,张孟喜1,吴惠明2. 地铁列车荷载计算方法对盾构隧道动力响应的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2015, 49(07): 1030-1034. |
[11] | 刘宇,江宏毅,王仕亮,王伊冰,陈燕苹. 基于加速度时域特征的实时人体行为模式识别[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2015, 49(02): 169-172. |
[12] | 黄建,宋爱平,陶建明,尹玮中. 数控运动相邻加工段拐角的平滑转接方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(05): 734-739. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||