基于渐消记忆递推最小二乘法的电动汽车电池荷电状态在线估计

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.172

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 1340-1346.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.172

• • 上一篇

基于渐消记忆递推最小二乘法的电动汽车电池荷电状态在线估计

陈玉珊¹, 秦琳琳¹(), 吴刚¹, 毛俊鑫²

^1.中国科学技术大学　信息科学技术学院，合肥　230026
^2.天津恒天新能源汽车研究院有限公司　汽车电子与电源系统研究所，天津　300451

收稿日期:2019-09-29 出版日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-12-31
通讯作者: 秦琳琳 E-mail:qll@ustc.edu.cn
作者简介:陈玉珊(1995-)，女，福建省厦门市人，硕士生，从事电池参数估计研究．

Online State of Charge Estimation for Battery in Electric Vehicles Based on Forgetting Factor Recursive Least Squares

CHEN Yushan¹, QIN Linlin¹(), WU Gang¹, MAO Junxin²

^1.School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
^2.Automotive Electronics and Power System Research Institute, Tianjin Hengtian New Energy Automobile Research Institute Co. , Ltd. , Tianjin 300451, China

Received:2019-09-29 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-12-31
Contact: QIN Linlin E-mail:qll@ustc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

电动汽车中，先进的电池管理系统可以为电池的安全高效使用提供保障．荷电状态(SOC)无法直接测量得到，电池管理系统的主要任务是准确、可靠地估计电池的SOC.为了估计电池的SOC，选择一阶电阻电容(RC)等效电路模型描述电池的外特性，模型参数中包含开路电压(OCV)，通过渐消记忆递推最小二乘法(FFRLS)辨识模型参数，再用SOC-OCV模型实时计算．使用马里兰大学高级生命周期工程研究中心(CALCE)电池组提出的镍钴锰酸锂(LNMC)/石墨电池在动态应力测试(DST)和北京动态应力测试(BJDST)工况下的数据检验算法，结果表明，SOC估计误差在DST工况下不超过 3.419 0%，在BJDST工况下不超过 4.233 5%，实现了SOC的在线估计．

关键词: 递推最小二乘法, 荷电状态, 在线估计, 电动汽车

Abstract:

An advanced battery management system ensures the safe and efficient use of batteries in electric vehicles. As the state of charge (SOC) cannot be measured directly, it is important for the battery management system to accurately and reliably estimate the SOC of batteries. In order to estimate SOC, a first-order resistor-capacitance (RC) equivalent circuit model is used to describe the external characteristic of batteries. The model parameters are identified by forgetting factor recursive least-squares (FFRLS). Open circuit voltage (OCV) is one of the model parameters, and then SOC can be estimated by the SOC-OCV model. The CALCE battery research group in the University of Maryland has proposed some data, which include the data of LNMC/graphite battery working under dynamic stress test (DST) and Beijing dynamic stress test (BJDST) conditions. These data are used to verify the proposed algorithm. The results show that the estimation error does not exceed 3.419 0% in DST and 4.233 5% in BJDST, which indicates that the proposed method can realize online SOC estimation.

Key words: recursive least squares, state of charge (SOC), online estimation, electric vehicle

中图分类号:

N945.12

陈玉珊, 秦琳琳, 吴刚, 毛俊鑫. 基于渐消记忆递推最小二乘法的电动汽车电池荷电状态在线估计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1340-1346.

CHEN Yushan, QIN Linlin, WU Gang, MAO Junxin. Online State of Charge Estimation for Battery in Electric Vehicles Based on Forgetting Factor Recursive Least Squares[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020, 54(12): 1340-1346.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

参考文献 16

[1]	XING Y J, HE W, PECHT M, et al. State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using the open-circuit voltage at various ambient temperatures[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 106-115.
[2]	LAI X, ZHENG Y J, SUN T. A comparative study of different equivalent circuit models for estimating state-of-charge of lithium-ion batteries[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 259: 566-577.
[3]	TANIM T R, RAHN C D, WANG C Y. State of charge estimation of a lithium ion cell based on a temperature dependent and electrolyte enhanced single particle model[J]. Energy, 2015, 80: 731-739.
[4]	LU L G, HAN X B, LI J Q, et al. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 226: 272-288.
[5]	XIONG R, SUN F C, GONG X Z, et al. A data-driven based adaptive state of charge estimator of lithium-ion polymer battery used in electric vehicles[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 1421-1433.
[6]	HE W, WILLIARD N, CHEN C, et al. State of charge estimation for Li-ion batteries using neural network modeling and unscented Kalman filter-based error cancellation[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2014, 62: 783-791.
[7]	WANG Y J, ZHANG C B, CHEN Z H. On-line battery state-of-charge estimation based on an integrated estimator[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 2026-2032.
[8]	YANG F F, XING Y J, WANG D, et al. A comparative study of three model-based algorithms for estimating state-of-charge of lithium-ion batteries under a new combined dynamic loading profile[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 164: 387-399.
[9]	DUONG V H, BASTAWROUS H A, LIM K, et al. Online state of charge and model parameters estimation of the LiFePO₄ battery in electric vehicles using multiple adaptive forgetting factors recursive least-squares[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 296: 215-224.
[10]	HE H W, ZHANG X W, XIONG R, et al. Online model-based estimation of state-of-charge and open-circuit voltage of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles[J]. Energy, 2012, 39(1): 310-318.
[11]	ZHANG C, ALLAFI W, DINH Q, et al. Online estimation of battery equivalent circuit model parameters and state of charge using decoupled least squares technique[J]. Energy, 2018, 142: 678-688.
[12]	PALEOLOGU C, BENESTY J, CIOCHINA S. A robust variable forgetting factor recursive least-squares algorithm for system identification[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2008, 15: 597-600.
[13]	冯培悌. 系统辨识[M]. 2版. 杭州：浙江大学出版社，2004.
	FENG Peiti. System identification [M]. 2nd ed. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2004.
[14]	ZHENG F D, XING Y J, JIANG J C, et al. Influence of different open circuit voltage tests on state of charge online estimation for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 513-525.
[15]	DUONG T Q. USABC and PNGV test procedures[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2000, 89(2): 244-248.
[16]	时玮，姜久春，张维戈，等. 纯电动公交车动力电池寿命测试行驶工况的研究[J]. 汽车工程，2013, 35(2): 138-151.
	SHI Wei, JIANG Jiuchun, ZHANG Weige, et al. A study on the driving cycle for the life test of traction battery in electric buses[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 138-151.

基于渐消记忆递推最小二乘法的电动汽车电池荷电状态在线估计

Online State of Charge Estimation for Battery in Electric Vehicles Based on Forgetting Factor Recursive Least Squares

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 16

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李恒杰, 朱江皓, 傅晓飞, 方陈, 梁达明, 周云. 基于集成学习的电动汽车充电站超短期负荷预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(8): 1004-1013.
[2]	李林晏, 韩爽, 乔延辉, 李莉, 刘永前, 阎洁, 刘海东. 面向高比例新能源并网场景的风光-电动车协同调度方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 554-563.
[3]	胡春阳, 吴鑫, 周峰. 基于区块链技术的电动汽车绿证交易研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 64-71.
[4]	侯珏, 姚栋伟, 吴锋, 吕成磊, 王涵, 沈俊昊. 混合励磁电机的电动汽车增程器控制策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 206-212.
[5]	吕祥梅, 刘天琪, 刘绚, 何川, 南璐, 曾红. 考虑高比例新能源消纳的多能源园区日前低碳经济调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(12): 1586-1597.
[6]	刘昊东, 张庆振, 郭云鹤, 茅佳雯. 基于递推最小二乘法的变体飞行器模型参数在线辨识[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(3): 103-110.
[7]	刘雨声，李万勇，张立，施骏业，陈江平. 采用R1234yf制冷剂的汽车超低温强化补气热泵空调性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(10): 1108-1116.
[8]	俞彬彬，王丹东，向伟，余浩弘，陈江平. 跨临界CO2电动汽车空调系统性能分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(7): 866-872.
[9]	李萍，谷波，缪梦华. 废热回收型纯电动汽车热泵系统试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(4): 468-472.
[10]	张建军，刘卫东，李乐，程瑞锋，郑海峰. 未知环境下水下机械手智能抓取的自适应阻抗控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(3): 341-347.
[11]	籍庆辉，朱平，卢家海，刘钊. 基于Kriging近似模型的碳纤维增强复合[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(2): 129-.
[12]	龚小祥, 常思勤, 蒋李晨, 李小攀. 电动汽车新型线控制动单元及其控制系统[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(03): 395-400.
[13]	牛继高a，司璐璐a，周苏a,b，章桐a,b,c. 增程式电动汽车能量控制策略的仿真分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(1): 140-145.
[14]	吴志伟, 张建龙, 吴红杰, 殷承良. 低速电动汽车混合能源存储系统效率分析 [J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(08): 1304-1309.