封闭式膜结构体育馆冬季热环境测试

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.11.006

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2018, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 1452-1458.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.11.006

封闭式膜结构体育馆冬季热环境测试

阴悦a，胡建辉a,b,c，陈务军a，李一坡a

上海交通大学 a. 空间结构研究中心; b. 海洋工程国家重点实验室; c. 高新船舶与深海开发装备协同创新中心，上海 200240

通讯作者: 陈务军，男，教授，博士生导师.E-mail：cwj@sjtu.edu.cn.
作者简介:阴悦（1992-），男，山东省泰安市人，博士生，主要研究方向为膜材料与膜结构设计.E-mail：yinyue_sjtu@sjtu.edu.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51608320，51478264），博士后科学基金（2016M591677）

Indoor Thermal Environment Measurement of Enclosed Gymnasium with Membrane Structure in Winter

YIN Yue,HU Jianhui,CHEN Wujun,LI Yipo

a. Space Structures Research Center； b. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering； c. Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240, China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在自然对流条件下，对封闭式膜结构体育馆的冬季室内热环境进行测试.根据不同的方位和高度共布置6个测点测量空气温度，同时得到了体育馆室内日照辐射强度、风速、黑球温度和相对湿度等热环境参数的变化曲线.分析了体育馆室内温度场的分布规律，采用修正后的预测投票平均值(aPMV)和预测不满意百分率(aPPD)指标对体育馆室内热环境进行评价.测试与分析表明：日照辐射是影响体育馆内部温度变化规律的主要因素.体育馆室内平均气温比外界高约3℃，随着室内高度的降低体育馆内升温时间逐渐延长，空气温度变化幅度呈现出显著的衰减性.测量时段内体育馆室内aPMV指标为 -1.2~-0.5，热环境aPPD指标为15%~40%.在自然通风条件下，膜结构内无保温隔热设计的封闭式体育馆冬季室内热环境不满足舒适性要求.

关键词: 膜结构, 封闭式体育馆, 热环境, 热舒适性评价

Abstract: Indoor temperature measurement of an enclosed gymnasium under membrane structure with natural ventilation was carried out during winter period. Air temperatures were measured from six positions with different heights and directions. Parameters relating to thermal environment were obtained, including indoor irradiation, velocity, globe temperature and relative humidity. This paper aimed to study indoor temperature distribution of the gymnasium and evaluate its thermal comfort by revised PMV-PPD index (aPMV-aPPD index). The results show that indoor irradiance is the main factor which effects the variation of indoor temperature. Mean air temperature inside was 3℃ higher than that outside. Air temperatures near the interior surface of the membrane roof kept higher in vertical direction and both amplitude and phase of the temperature decayed at positions in lower altitude. The aPMV value of the gymnasium inside ranged from -1.2 to -0.5 while aPPD varied from 15% to 40%. Without thermal insulation design in membrane structures, indoor environment in enclosed gymnasium hardly satisfies comfortable requirement under natural ventilation condition.

Key words: thermal environment, thermal comfort evaluation, membrane structure, enclosed gymnasium

中图分类号:

阴悦a，胡建辉a,b,c，陈务军a，李一坡a. 封闭式膜结构体育馆冬季热环境测试[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(11): 1452-1458.

YIN Yue,HU Jianhui,CHEN Wujun,LI Yipo. Indoor Thermal Environment Measurement of Enclosed Gymnasium with Membrane Structure in Winter[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(11): 1452-1458.

参考文献

［1］HU J, CHEN W, CAI Q, et al. Structural behavior of the PV-ETFE cushion roof［J］. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 101: 169-180. ［2］HU J, CHEN W, ZHAO B, et al. Buildings with ETFE foils: A review on material properties, architectural performance and structural behavior［J］. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 131: 411-422. ［3］陈务军.膜结构工程设计［M］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005: 51-55. CHEN Wujun. Membrane structure engineering design［M］. Beijing: Chinese Construction Industry Press, 2005: 51-55. ［4］郭晓娟.膜结构建筑适用性分析［D］.杭州: 浙江大学, 2013. GUO Xiaojuan. Applicability analysis of membrane structure［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013. ［5］ESCOFFIER A, ALBRECHT A, CONSIGNY F. Nice stadium: Design of a flat single layer ETFE roof［J］. International Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2014, 8(3): 61-65. ［6］KUMAR A, SUMAN B M. Experimental evaluation of insulation materials for walls and roofs and their impact on indoor thermal comfort under composite climate［J］. Building and Environment, 2013, 59: 635-643. ［7］AFRIN S, CHILTON J, LAU B, et al. Evaluation and comparison of thermal environment of atria enclosed with ETFE foil cushion envelope［J］. Energy Procedia, 2015, 78: 477-482. ［8］HE J, HOYANO A. Measurement and evaluation of the summer microclimate in the semi-enclosed space under a membrane structure［J］. Building and Environment, 2010, 45(1): 230-242. ［9］陈钢.新形式创造新功能——上海交通大学体育馆建筑设计［J］.城市建筑, 2008(11): 62-64. CHEN Gang. New form creates new function—Design of the gymnasium in Shanghai Jiao Tong University［J］. Urbanism and Architecture, 2008(11): 62-64. ［10］VAN HOOFF T, BLOCKEN B. Full-scale measurements of indoor environmental conditions and natural ventilation in a large semi-enclosed stadium: Possibilities and limitations for CFD validation［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 104/105/106: 330-341. ［11］中国气象局. 风力等级: GB/T 28591—2012 ［S］.北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012: 1-2. China Meteorological Administration. Wind Scale: GB/T 28591—2012 ［S］. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012: 1-2. ［12］HOLMAN J P. Heat transfer, tenth edition［M］. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 2010: 139-145. ［13］FANGER P O, TOFTUM J. Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates［J］. Energy & Buildings, 2002, 34(6): 533-536. ［14］YAO R M, LI B Z, LIU J. A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort—Adaptive Predicted MeanVote (aPMV)［J］. Building & Environment, 2009, 44(10): 2089-2096. ［15］中华人民共和国住房与城乡建设部. 民用建筑室内热湿环境评价标准: GB/T 50785—2012 ［S］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012: 17-21. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Evaluation standard for indoor thermal environment in civil buildings: GB/T 50785—2012 ［S］. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012: 17-21. ［16］International Orgarization for Standardization. ISO 7726-2001. Ergonomics of the thermal environment-Instruments for measuring physical quantities ［S］. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2001: 7-49. ［17］ASHRAE. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010: Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy ［S］. Atlanta: American Society of Heating Ventilating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2011: 4-11.

[1]	王子通，马宁，周岱，孙颖昊. 伞形膜结构风压和风振模拟与分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(11): 1562-1567.
[2]	周岱，钱锟，马骏，韩兆龙，洪荣华，季清. 漏斗形开敞式膜结构的风致振动效应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(06): 862-866.