基于Uchida-Kraepelin心理测试的酒后驾车交通事故倾向测量

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (03): 413-418.

基于Uchida-Kraepelin心理测试的酒后驾车交通事故倾向测量

钟铭恩1，洪汉池1，吴平东2，方遒1

(1.厦门理工学院福建省客车先进设计与制造重点实验室，厦门 361024； 2.北京理工大学机械与车辆学院，北京 100081)

收稿日期:2015-04-15 出版日期:2016-03-28 发布日期:2016-03-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(61104225),福建省自然科学基金项目(2015J01672)资助

Traffic Accident Tendency Measurement Method for Drunk Driving Based on Uchida Kraepelin Psychological Test

ZHONG Mingen1,HONG Hanchi1,WU Pingdong2，FANG Qiu1

(1. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Bus Advanced Design and Manufacture, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China; 2. School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Received:2015-04-15 Online:2016-03-28 Published:2016-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 摘要：针对利用驾驶员的血液酒精浓度一致标准测定和问责酒后驾车行为的方案在某些场合可能不够严谨的问题，为探索新型测量技术，招募18位驾驶员开展酒后UchidaKraepelin心理测试(UK测试).结果显示，随着驾驶员饮酒量的增加，UK作业曲线从未饮酒时的定型曲线特征逐渐向非定型曲线特征转变，且作业错误率均值递增.定义UK作业偏离度，探明其与交通事故倾向具有一致性，且两者具有正相关性，平均相关系数为0.71.UK作业偏离度能够揭示酒后驾车交通事故倾向，或可作为酒后驾车行为测定和问责的一种新证据参数；基于UK测试分析的酒后驾车交通事故倾向测量是一种可探索方案.

关键词: 酒后驾车, 交通事故倾向, UchidaKraepelin心理测试, 曲线定型, 作业偏离

Abstract: Abstract： In view of the problem that it might not be reasonable enough to evaluate and punish drunk driving according to the blood alcohol concentration of the driver, 18 drivers were recruited to join the Uchida Kraepelin (UK) test in order to discover a novel method. The results showed that work curves of UK changed significantly from shaped style to unshaped style as the drivers drank successively, together with increasing values of average work mistake rates. These helped to define a work deviation value. Experiments proved that there existed monotonic consistency relationships between work deviation values and traffic accident tendencies, together with an average coefficient of 0.71. Thus, UK work deviation value was able to uncover traffic accident tendencies of drunk driving, and probably could be a new evidence for judging and publishing drunk driving. UK test and its results analysis may be a potential method for measuring traffic accident tendencies of drunk driving.

Key words: Key words： drunk driving, traffic accident tendency, Uchida Kraepelin (UK) test, curves in shape, work deviation

中图分类号:

U 491.3

钟铭恩, 洪汉池, 吴平东, 方遒. 基于Uchida-Kraepelin心理测试的酒后驾车交通事故倾向测量[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(03): 413-418.

ZHONG Mingen, HONG Hanchi, WU Pingdong, FANG Qiu. Traffic Accident Tendency Measurement Method for Drunk Driving Based on Uchida Kraepelin Psychological Test[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(03): 413-418.

参考文献

［1］World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety: Supporting a decade of action［M］. Geneva: WHO Press, 2013. ［2］顾雯雯,俞敏,丛黎明. 酒后驾车现状与危害及预防控制研究进展［J］. 中国预防医学杂志, 2010, 11(8):854857. GU Wenwen, YU Min, CHONG Liming. Review of present situation, harm and prevention control about drunk driving［J］. China Preventive Medicine, 2010, 11(8):854857. ［3］袁伟, 李春明, 吴付威, 等. 饮酒对驾驶人判断与反应能力的影响分析［J］. 交通信息与安全, 2013,31(4):6266. YUAN Wei, LI Chunming, WU Fuwei, et al. Effect of alcohol consumption on driver’s judgment and action abilities［J］. Journal of Transportation and Safety, 2013,31(4):6266. ［4］钟铭恩, 吴平东, 彭军强, 等．基于血液酒精浓度和脑电特征的酒后驾车事故倾向对比研究［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2013, 32(3):378383. ZHONG Mingen, WU Pingdong, PENG Junqiang, et al. Comparative study of traffic accident proneness for drunk driving via blood alcohol concentration and EEG［J］. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2013, 32(3):378383. ［5］KOHJI M, ETSUNORI F, SHIGEYUKI K, et al. Noninvasive biological sensor system for detection of drunk driving［J］. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2011, 15(1):1925. ［6］SAKAIRI M, SUZUKI D, NISHIMURA A, et al. Simultaneous detection of breath and alcohol using breathalcohol sensor for prevention of drunk driving［J］. IEICE Electronics Express, 2010, 7(6):467472. ［7］范金锋, 邵晨曦, 王剑, 等. 醉酒者脑电和正常脑电非线性特性的比较评估［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2008, 27(1):1828. FAN Jinfeng, SHAO Chenxi, WANG Jian, et al. A comparative evaluation of nonlinear characteristics of EEG for alcoholic and normal people［J］. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2008, 27(1):1828. ［8］邹阳, 苗夺谦, 王登. 醉酒者和正常人脑电的样本熵研究［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2010, 29(6): 939942. ZOU Yang, MIAO Duoqian, WANG Deng. Research on sample entropy of alcoholic and normal people［J］. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 29(6): 939942. ［9］KOUSARRIZI M R N, GHANBARI A A, GHARAVIRI A, et al. Classification of alcoholics and nonalcoholics via EEG using SVM and neural networks［C］∥Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. Beijing: IEEE Press, 2009: 14. ［10］钟铭恩, 吴平东, 彭军强, 等. 基于脑电特征的酒后驾车事故倾向预估建模［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(2):287292. ZHONG Mingen, WU Pingdong, PENG Junqiang, et al. Building a prediction model for traffic accident proneness caused by drunk driving via numerical characteristics of the drivers’ EEGs［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(2):287292. ［11］YAMAGATA Y, SUGAWARA Y. Sensory evaluation spectrum method as a descriptive sensory analysis［J］. Psychology, 2014, 5(14):15911610. ［12］FUJIMAKI K, TAKEMOTO H, MORINOBU S. Environmental sounds enhance cortical responses related to a serial arithmetic task［J］. Psychology, 2014,5(8):828839. ［13］TAKIZAWA R, NISHIMURA Y, YAMASUE H, et al. Anxiety and performance: The disparate roles of prefrontal subregions under maintained psychological stress［J］. Cerebral Cortex, 2014, 24(7): 18581866. ［14］KURATSUNE D, TAJIMA S, KOIZUMI J, et al. Changes in reaction time, coefficient of variance of reaction time, and autonomic nerve function in the mental fatigue state caused by longterm computerized Kraepelin test workload in healthy volunteers［J］. World Journal of Neuroscience, 2012, 2(2): 113118. ［15］SHIMAZU T. Studies on the work curve for the Uchida Kraepelin Test［J］. Bulletin of Tokai Womens College, 1985, 5:3951.