QP980钢拉伸过程的晶体塑性模拟

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.391

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 1476-1482.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.391

所属专题：《上海交通大学学报》2021年“金属学与金属工艺”专题；《上海交通大学学报》2021年12期专题汇总专辑

QP980钢拉伸过程的晶体塑性模拟

杨浩, 汪华苗, 李大永()

上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2021-11-28 发布日期:2021-12-03
通讯作者: 李大永 E-mail:dyli@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:杨浩(1992-),男,安徽省合肥市人,博士生,从事晶体塑性与马氏体相变研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U1860110);国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB2010300)

Crystal Plasticity Modeling of Tension Process of QP980 Steel

YANG Hao, WANG Huamiao, LI Dayong()

School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2020-11-20 Online:2021-11-28 Published:2021-12-03
Contact: LI Dayong E-mail:dyli@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

淬火配分QP980钢变形过程中存在马氏体相变,对材料的力学性能产生明显影响.通过电子背散射衍射方法表征了QP980钢变形前后的微观组织,基于马氏体相变晶体学唯象理论建立了考虑相变的弹-黏塑性自洽多晶体塑性模型,模拟了QP980钢在单向拉伸过程中的宏观流动应力和织构演化.材料初始包含铁素体(F)、马氏体和残余奥氏体(RA),各相均为轧制织构,变形后残余奥氏体含量明显减少,残余奥氏体的<111>丝织构、铁素体和马氏体的<110>丝织构在拉伸方向有明显增强.相变提高了材料的强度和加工硬化率,但对各相的织构演化影响很小.根据计算变形过程中应变和应力的分配情况,铁素体和回火马氏体对变形起主要作用,变形过程中新生马氏体的应力最大,成为断裂的潜在萌生点.

关键词: 淬火配分钢, 晶体塑性, 马氏体相变, 弹-黏塑性自洽

Abstract:

The mechanical behavior of the quenching and partitioning 980 (QP980) steel is affected by martensitic transformation during deformation. The microstructure of QP980 steel before and after deformation is characterized by using the electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) method. An elastic visco-plastic self-consistent (EVPSC) polycrystalline model considering phase transformation is established based on the phenomenological theory of martensite crystallography (PTMC). The macroscopic flow stress as well as texture evolution of QP980 steel during uniaxial tension process is reproduced by the model. The material consists of ferrite (F), martensite, and retained austenite (RA) with rolling texture in the initial state. After deformation, the content of RA decreases and the <111> fiber of the RA, the <110> fiber of the ferrite and martensite along the tensile direction are enhanced. Phase transformation enhances the strength and work hardening rate but has little effect on the texture evolution. According to the distribution of stress and strain during the calculation of deformation, ferrite and tempered martensite (TM) contribute most to the deformation, and the new martensite (NM) is the most probable nucleation sites of fracture due to its highest average stress.

Key words: quenching and partitioning (QP) steel, crystal plasticity, martensitic transformation, elastic visco-plastic self-consistent (EVPSC)

中图分类号:

杨浩, 汪华苗, 李大永. QP980钢拉伸过程的晶体塑性模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(11): 1476-1482.

YANG Hao, WANG Huamiao, LI Dayong. Crystal Plasticity Modeling of Tension Process of QP980 Steel[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(11): 1476-1482.

图/表 6

图1

表1

各相硬化参数和残余奥氏体相变参数

相	滑移系	$τ α 0$ /MPa	$τ α 1$ /MPa	$θ α 0$ /MPa	$θ α 1$ /MPa	β₁	β₂	β₃
奥氏体	{111}<110>	240	1	800	20	6.26	0.57	2
铁素体	{110}<111>+{112}<111>	190	150	1200	150
回火马氏体	{110}<111>+{112}<111>	390	50	600	50
新生马氏体	{110}<111>+{112}<111>	450	40	2500	2200

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 24

[1]	MATLOCK D K, SPEER J G. Third generation of AHSS: Microstructure design concepts, microstructure and texture in steels[M]. London: Springer, 2009.
[2]	WANG L, SPEER J G. Quenching and partitioning steel heat treatment[J]. Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, 2013, 2(4):268-281. doi: 10.1007/s13632-013-0082-8 URL
[3]	INAM A, IMTIAZ Y, HAFEEZ M A, et al. Effect of tempering time on microstructure, mechanical, and electrochemical properties of quenched-partitioned-tempered advanced high strength steel (AHSS)[J]. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6(12):126509. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab52b7 URL
[4]	LI Z, KIRAN R, HU J, et al. Analysis and design of a three-phase TRIP steel microstructure for enhanced fracture resistance[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2020, 221(1):53-85. doi: 10.1007/s10704-019-00405-6 URL
[5]	CHENG G, CHOI K S, HU X, et al. Determining individual phase properties in a multi-phase Q&P steel using multi-scale indentation tests[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 652:384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.072 URL
[6]	SRIVASTAVA A, GHASSEMI-ARMAKI H, SUNG H, et al. Micromechanics of plastic deformation and phase transformation in a three-phase TRIP-assisted advanced high strength steel: Experiments and modeling[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Phy-sics of Solids, 2015, 78:46-69.
[7]	HU X H, CHOI K S, SUN X, et al. Determining individual phase flow properties in a quench and partitioning steel with in situ high-energy X-ray diffraction and multiphase elasto-plastic self-consistent method[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2016, 47(12):5733-5749. doi: 10.1007/s11661-016-3373-2 URL
[8]	YANG H, WANG H M, YANG Z L, et al. In situ neutron diffraction and crystal plasticity analysis on Q&P1180 steel during plastic deformation[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021, 802:140425. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140425 URL
[9]	ZOU D Q, LI S H, HE J. Temperature and strain rate dependent deformation induced martensitic transformation and flow behavior of quenching and partitioning steels[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017, 680:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.083 URL
[10]	ZOU D, LI S, HE J, et al. The deformation induced martensitic transformation and mechanical behavior of quenching and partitioning steels under complex loading process[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2018, 715:243-256. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.011 URL
[11]	HE J, HAN G F, LI S H, et al. To correlate the phase transformation and mechanical behavior of QP steel sheets[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 152:198-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.003 URL
[12]	HU X H, SUN X, HECTOR L G, et al. Individual phase constitutive properties of a TRIP-assisted QP980 steel from a combined synchrotron X-ray diffraction and crystal plasticity approach[J]. Acta Materialia, 2017, 132:230-244. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.028 URL
[13]	MOHAMMED B, PARK T, POURBOGHRAT F, et al. Multiscale crystal plasticity modeling of multiphase advanced high strength steel[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 151:57-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.007 URL
[14]	LEBENSOHN R A, TOMÉ C N. A self-consistent anisotropic approach for the simulation of plastic deformation and texture development of polycrystals: Application to zirconium alloys[J]. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 1993, 41(9):2611-2624. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K URL
[15]	WANG H, WU P D, TOMÉ C N, et al. A finite strain elastic-viscoplastic self-consistent model for polycrystalline materials[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2010, 58(4):594-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.01.004 URL
[16]	TOME C, CANOVA G R, KOCKS U F, et al. The relation between macroscopic and microscopic strain hardening in F.C.C. polycrystals[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1984, 32(10):1637-1653. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90222-0 URL
[17]	WECHSLER M S, LIEBERMAN D S, READ T A. On the theory of the formation of martensite[J]. Trans AIME, 1953, 197:1503-1515.
[18]	BOWLES J S, MACKENZIE J K. The crystallography of martensite transformations I[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1954, 2(1):129-137. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(54)90102-9 URL
[19]	MACKENZIE J K, BOWLES J S. The crystallography of martensite transformations II[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1954, 2(1):138-147. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(54)90103-0 URL
[20]	WAYMAN C. Introduction to the crystallography of martensitic transformations[M]. London: Macmillan, 1964.
[21]	WANG H, JEONG Y, CLAUSEN B, et al. Effect of martensitic phase transformation on the behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel under tension[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 649:174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.108 URL
[22]	BHADESHIA H. Geometry of crystals[M]. London: University of Cambridge, 2001.
[23]	OLSON G B, COHEN M. Kinetics of strain-induced martensitic nucleation[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1975, 6(4):791-795. doi: 10.1007/BF02672301 URL
[24]	WOO W, EM V T, KIM E Y, et al. Stress-strain relationship between ferrite and martensite in a dual-phase steel studied by in situ neutron diffraction and crystal plasticity theories[J]. Acta Materialia, 2012, 60(20):6972-6981. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.054 URL

QP980钢拉伸过程的晶体塑性模拟

Crystal Plasticity Modeling of Tension Process of QP980 Steel

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 24

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖飞，金学军. 如何实现固态材料变形制冷?[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(Sup.1): 95-96.
[2]	邵吉吉1，张旭1,2,3，苗同臣1，尚福林3. 晶体塑性模型在微压缩实验误差分析中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(7): 860-866.
[3]	金明江，顾一嘉，金学军. Au-Cu-Al合金相变的内耗[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2010, 44(05): 609-0612.
[4]	周正存，杨洪，严勇健. Ni-Al系合金中的逆马氏体相变[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2010, 44(05): 628-0630.
[5]	韩利战，顾剑锋，潘健生. X12CrMoWVNbN10-1-1铁素体耐热钢中的马氏体相变过程[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2010, 44(01): 11-0015.